also @ TechSpot: Desktop Core i3 Ivy Bridge CPUs leaked ahead of launch
Welcome to the TechSpot OpenBoards. Please read the FAQ if you have any questions. Sign up or Login to participate.

Go Back   TechSpot OpenBoards > TechSpot Editorial and Site Feedback > Articles and Reviews Comments

Collaborate in the cloud with Office, Exchange, SharePoint, and Lync

Mainstream Quad-Core CPU Performance Comparison

Reply
Page 1 of 3 1 23
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 09-11-2009
Julio's Avatar
TechSpot Executive Editor
 
Location: Ecuador
Member since: Feb 2002, 5,355 posts
System specs
Mainstream Quad-Core CPU Performance Comparison

With more powerful quad-core processors becoming mainstream, and with so many options currently available, we wanted to know which CPU provides users with the most value at under $300. That said, we won't just be evaluating the value of the individual processors, but also their accompanying platforms.

Read the full review at:
http://www.techspot.com/review/195-m...u-performance/

Please leave your feedback here.
  #2  
Old 09-11-2009
LinkedKube's Avatar
TechSpot Project Baby
 
Location: Detroit
Member since: Mar 2007, 3,943 posts
System specs
Love this review. The truth is...everyone wants a quad core pc. Dont lie, yeah I'm looking at you too. Well maybe not everyone, but for those of us that build are more often than ever(pre 2007 when "dual core" was dominant) wanting more out of our computers. To make a review with a specific price point is/was a great idea for people jumping into the multi core pc market. So again, great read and review.
  #3  
Old 09-11-2009
red1776's Avatar
Omnipotent Ruler of the Universe
 
Location: Minneapolis MN
Member since: Sep 2008, 5,668 posts
System specs
Quote:
Love this review. The truth is...everyone wants a quad core pc
. Dont lie, yeah I'm looking at you too.
Geezus your mean!

anyway great review. the quad core market just more exciting and it seems that quad computing is on the verge of actually arriving. im accumulating parts for an i7 build, and setting aside $$ to snap up four of the DX11 cards this fall......oh yes, and waiting for some benchmarks....(ahem)^
  #4  
Old 09-11-2009
LinkedKube's Avatar
TechSpot Project Baby
 
Location: Detroit
Member since: Mar 2007, 3,943 posts
System specs
Yea yeah Red I know. I'm on a netbook as we speak, working on reassembling my desktop with vertex ssd's a new case and flashy lights.
  #5  
Old 09-11-2009
TechSpot Booster
 
Member since: May 2007, 552 posts
Best bang for the buck (IMO)

Intel Core I7 CPU's

This one is $299 Intel Core i7 860 Lynnfield 2.8GHz

This one is $279 Intel Core i7 920 Nehalem 2.66GHz

These prices will fall. There are many good deals popping up lately on these CPU's
  #6  
Old 09-11-2009
TechSpot Booster
 
Member since: May 2007, 552 posts
Next step down would be the Core 2 Quad series

http://www.compusa.com/applications/...asp?CatId=2758
  #7  
Old 09-11-2009
red1776's Avatar
Omnipotent Ruler of the Universe
 
Location: Minneapolis MN
Member since: Sep 2008, 5,668 posts
System specs
Quote:
Originally Posted by supersmashbrada View Post
Yea yeah Red I know. I'm on a netbook as we speak, working on reassembling my desktop with vertex ssd's a new case and flashy lights.
LOL , just givin ya the needle

I thought you hated flashy lights!

glad you brought that up, are those the best?, and what case did you decide on?
  #8  
Old 09-11-2009
Steve's Avatar
TechSpot Elite
 
Location: Australia, Melbourne
Member since: Sep 2006, 632 posts
@gguerra
We were well aware of those prices when writing the article. While you are certainly entitled to your opinion I think there is little denying that the Core i5 750 is by far the best value quad-core processor right now. In fact I will be proving this very soon in an upcoming clock to clock performance article.

On another note thanks for all the great feedback guys.
  #9  
Old 09-11-2009
TechSpot Booster
 
Member since: May 2007, 552 posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by [-Steve-] View Post
We were well aware of those prices when writing the article.
Sorry, I was not aware of the article. I was only responding to Julio's question (thread). I was also not aware of the Core i5. I will read more about it.
  #10  
Old 09-11-2009
Steve's Avatar
TechSpot Elite
 
Location: Australia, Melbourne
Member since: Sep 2006, 632 posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by gguerra View Post
Sorry, I was not aware of the article. I was only responding to Julio's question (thread). I was also not aware of the Core i5. I will read more about it.
Ahh no problem I thought you just read the article, enjoy
  #11  
Old 09-11-2009
Ritwik7's Avatar
TechSpot Evangelist
 
Location: Calcutta, India
Member since: Jan 2007, 2,195 posts
System specs
Brilliant review. Hope the i5 releases in India soon. Will definitely make it my first preference when building my friend's rig later this month.

Last edited by Ritwik7; 09-11-2009 at 04:14 PM..
  #12  
Old 09-11-2009
LNCPapa's Avatar
TechSpot Special Forces
 
Location: Duke University, North Carolina, USA
Member since: Feb 2002, 3,232 posts
System specs
If you have a MicroCenter near you then here's a deal you should pay attention to - they never adjusted their prices when they started going back up:
http://www.microcenter.com/single_pr...uct_id=0302727
  #13  
Old 09-11-2009
Guest
 
That's where I got it for my son's computer. I expected the new line-up to come out and screw me royally price-wise but wanted to build a computer in time for my son's birthday. I'm, personally, now looking at the i5 for my main machine.
  #14  
Old 09-11-2009
TechSpot Member
 
Member since: Jan 2007, 138 posts
the best bang for the buck right now is still the Q6600. overclockable up to 4ghz with a mere $180 price tag, not to mention what really makes it the bang is the low price of DDR2 (you can easily get total of 8gigs of them for dirt cheap), and a decently priced P45 mobo.
  #15  
Old 09-11-2009
TechSpot Booster
 
Member since: May 2007, 552 posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by howzz1854 View Post
the best bang for the buck right now is still the Q6600. overclockable up to 4ghz with a mere $180 price tag, not to mention what really makes it the bang is the low price of DDR2 (you can easily get total of 8gigs of them for dirt cheap), and a decently priced P45 mobo.
Don't mean to hijack the thread. I OC'd my Q6600 to a modest 3.0Ghz with a cheap cooler (slightly better than stock). I only increased FSB to 333 and didnt mess with any other settings. Running on a Asus P5K-VM Mobo with integrated graphics. What other settings would I change to go higher speed? Isn't 4Ghz kind of stretching it? What type of cooling would you use to OC it to 4Ghz.
  #16  
Old 09-11-2009
TechSpot Member
 
Member since: Jan 2007, 138 posts
it all depends on the temperature of your overclock and the quality of your mobo. when the above two are satisfied, all that limits your speed is the quality of the cpu silicon and the amount of patience you have. from the looks of your specs, you're limited by both of these factors. you need at least a Xigmatek S1283 heatsink or equivalent, and a quality mobo like an Asus P5Q Deluxe or Gigabyte P45 UD3P. these are just the two major factors (aside from speed of your ram, and quality of your power supply).
4Ghz is a bit of a strech for most general public, but not for a water cooled setup. I've got two Q6600 at home one does 3.5ghz while the other at 4Ghz. the one @ 4Ghz requires water and voltage of 1.5v to the core. but with decent air cooler, it does 3.5~3.6ghz easy.
most of the Q6600 G0 stepping are well capable of 3.4ghz and above, so it's really a good deal consider how cheap DDR2 and P45 mobo is.
  #17  
Old 09-11-2009
Technochicken's Avatar
TechSpot Paladin
 
Location: Atlanta
Member since: Jun 2008, 852 posts
System specs
One benchmark I would like to see with these processors is a video encoding or DVD ripping test, using a software like Handbrake. I'm interested in seeing if hyperthreading would have any significant benefits there, as those processes are highly thread-able.
  #18  
Old 09-11-2009
TechSpot Enthusiast
 
Member since: Jun 2006, 160 posts
I'd like to see how the much more expensive 9xx Intel series CPUs faired, just for comparison sake.
I'm still satisfied with my E8400 dual core rig, waiting as long as possible before upgrading, atm.
I was on newegg and several users said these aren't a big upgrade from good dual cores, and QX6600's.
If upgrading from lower, definitely go for it, however! 8)
Regular hard drives are still holding Windows back, no surprise really, damn resource piggy.
  #19  
Old 09-11-2009
Guest
 
Sir very nice review I totally agree with it except the pricing Point of view. You yourself have posted the link of AM3 motherboard , please look once I saw a $77 AM3 based Mb then why you have only included $180 while you have given a price range in i5 segment .?

Please edit it as it creates FUD. a 400$ system for Phenom II with top of the line CPU makes more sense http://techspot.pricegrabber.com/search_attrib.php?form_keyword=AM3&topcat_id=&Search=Go&page_id=40&st=filte r-query

Edit : Just a $60 Am2+ Mb in which Am3 based processor will work http://techspot.pricegrabber.com/search_getprod.php/masterid=728644330/search=AM3/st=product/sv=title

There is plethora of options there why you only included $180 Mb ?

Regards
  #20  
Old 09-11-2009
Steve's Avatar
TechSpot Elite
 
Location: Australia, Melbourne
Member since: Sep 2006, 632 posts
Before I begin let me just say that we are going to add Core 2 Quad Q6600 results in the next 12 hours or so ;)
At howzz1854, how can the Q6600 be the best bang for your buck at $180 US right now? You can’t but it as far as I am aware and have not been able to for quite some time. In any case the Q6600 is orders slower than the Core i5 750 and at $20 US less you would have to be crazy to go for the Q6600 instead and DDR2 memory is going to save you just as little as will a good quality P45 motherboard.
At gguerra, we were able to overclock the Core i5 750 to over 4.0GHz on the ASUS P55 motherboard by doing nothing more than increasing the base clock, no other settings were messed with. You can probably reach 3.4 – 3.6GHz with a little fine tuning.
Reply
Page 1 of 3 1 23

Similar Topics
Topic Replies Forum
Upgrading from Core 2 Duo to Quad Core won't Post 10 Processors and Motherboards
Intel Quad core/Quad core extreme difference? (Q6600/QX6700) 5 Processors and Motherboards
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6700 review: Quad Core is here! 7 Articles and Reviews Comments
S-ATA/RAID chipset performance comparison 0 General Discussion
Quad Core Quad Core Processor to bring Tera Ops? 2 General Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:06 PM.