Welcome to the TechSpot OpenBoards. Please read the FAQ if you have any questions. Login to participate.

Go Back   TechSpot OpenBoards > Hardware & Tweaking > Overclocking, Cooling and Modding

2046??? not 2048?

Reply
Bookmark / Share this page
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 03-25-2007
Sjbrand99's Avatar
Banned
 
Location: Scotland
Member since: Apr 2006, 267 posts
2046??? not 2048?

How come with my new factory PC, it displays that I have 2046mg RAM instead of 2048?
It is my second computer, not my sig comp, however it should have 2048 (2 sricks of 1gb)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-25-2007
MetalX's Avatar
TechSpot Maniac
 
Location: Hamilton, ON, CAN
Member since: Dec 2005, 1,625 posts
System specs
Something might be using 2MB for itself. I'd say integrated graphics, but A) a PC with 2GB of RAM is unlikely to have integrated, and B) Integrated takes 32-128MB.
Reply With Quote
You can remove this banner by registering, join the TS Community for free.
  #3  
Old 03-25-2007
Rayss523's Avatar
TechSpot Member
 
Member since: Aug 2006, 102 posts
You have a bad sector and the PC is not using that section of your memory, therefore preventing BSOD overdosing from memory ram failure of the 3rd degree samuri warrior ninja zero one zero fight.

I dont know but hopefully you found that last bit somewhat humorous.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-25-2007
F1N3ST's Avatar
TechSpot Addict
 
Location: USA - Michigan - Trenton
Member since: Jul 2006, 1,082 posts
Dear god 2MB of memory is missing, i have 2046 also but w/e. It is fine.

I bought a 320gb HD, andit comes with 298GB formatted, kinda pisses me off thats like a 300GB drive not 320.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-25-2007
TechSpot Member
 
Member since: Jan 2007, 188 posts
yea 2mb will not have any noticable effect on performance.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-26-2007
Banned
 
Member since: Aug 2004, 25,948 posts
Windows isn`t always very accurate when it comes to reporting ram sizes etc.

What does the free Everest programme say?

Regards Howard
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-26-2007
Sjbrand99's Avatar
Banned
 
Location: Scotland
Member since: Apr 2006, 267 posts
Good idea. Ill get back at you with that Howard.

Oh, and to HPCE_Larry and F1N3ST. It is not the amount of RAM missing, as 2mb is trivial, it is the point that this could indicate corrupt RAM or a system error! Common sense kills...
Reply With Quote
You can remove this banner by registering, join the TS Community for free.
  #8  
Old 03-26-2007
SNGX1275's Avatar
TS Special Forces
 
Location: Rolla, Missouri, USA
Member since: Feb 2002, 8,246 posts
System specs
It is fine. I never paid much attention in XP, but now that I have Vista installed in my main machine it reports 2046 as well. and I know my RAM is good. I'm not worried about it.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-26-2007
Sjbrand99's Avatar
Banned
 
Location: Scotland
Member since: Apr 2006, 267 posts
Yer I'm on vista too. Good s**t.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-26-2007
Mictlantecuhtli's Avatar
TS Special Forces
 
Location: Finland
Member since: Feb 2002, 4,751 posts
System specs
I think the two megabytes are reserved for ACPI tables.

Some mainboards and operating systems may handle ACPI differently, so not every PC configuration has 2 MB "missing".
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-26-2007
MetalX's Avatar
TechSpot Maniac
 
Location: Hamilton, ON, CAN
Member since: Dec 2005, 1,625 posts
System specs
No matter what it is, 2MB doesn't make the slightest difference... after all you still have 2046MB left!
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:10 AM.