Quality (30% of the total score) It was strange to be checking an Enermax power supply which was not actually made by Enermax but fortunately (for both the company and the users) their OEM did not let them down. Even though we have seen better, the...
I have always been fond of Enermax power supplies. I think it's because the Enermax Galaxy 1000w was the first high end power supply that I owned. I was very impressed with that first power supply and Enermax made a very good first impression on...
While not being able to provide as impressive figures as EMG700AWT in our tests, ENM750AWT proved to be worth every penny. It is about 70€ cheaper than the higher efficiency model (EMG-series) and still provides us very similar performance in our...
The Enermax NAXN 82+ 750 W is a very nice mainstream power supply that will meet the needs of the average user. Efficiency was high, ranging from 83.8% to 86.4% when pulled between 20% and 80% of the labeled wattage (i.e. between 150 W and 600 W),...
The Enermax NAXN 750W is the second value unit we have seen from Enermax in the ~700-750W range recently. Overall, there is no substantial difference in the cumulative performance of the two units even though each unit has specific strong and weak...
Enermax has done a fine job with the NAXN 82+ 750W and offers consumers a very complete package not only for today but far into the future. The NANX 82+ 750W is DXXI ready for upcoming models which may require two 8-Pin PCI-E connectors per card. For...
Enermax ha demostrado una vez más la calidad que tiene en este terreno, las fuentes de alimentación. La serie NAXN 82+ es sin duda una gran opción para equipos de gama media-alta con una o dos gráficas ya que dispone de...
La Enermax NANX de 750 W cumple con lo prometido, y nos garantiza un funcionamiento continuado, estable y eficiente. Coincidiendo en gran medida con los resultados de nuestro análisis, el oficial de parte de 80 PLUS nos deja una fuente con una...
A Enermax NAXN 82+ 750 W é uma excelente fonte de alimentação que suprirá as necessidades do usuário médio. A eficiência foi alta, variando entre 83,8% e 86,4% quando extraímos entre 20% e 80% da potência...
Pros:
Cons: