AMD launches two new Bulldozer chips, FX-6100 & FX-8120 get price cuts

By Leeky
Feb 28, 2012
Post New Reply
  1. AMD has added two new FX-series processors to their range of Bulldozer CPUs using the AM3+ socket. At the same time, the company announced it plans to reduce the retail…

    Read the whole story
  2. amstech

    amstech TechSpot Enthusiast Posts: 1,295   +439

    AMD doesn't need to snip the prices on Bulldozer, they need to SLASH them.
    I've talked with a couple of our vendors and those chips are clogging up the shelves.
    Only fanboys have been buying these and thier numbers are dwindling .

    Thanks god AMD's Radeons are doing well.
  3. As long as I know amd has good price performace ratio in the mid range, another story if you have the money and want to buy a intel solution for a gamming or video editing pc. Otherwise I don't know why would someone be unhappy with amd performance at their price point.
  4. princeton

    princeton TS Addict Posts: 1,677

    You're mistaken. AMD has no price point above $100 where using them in a system is a better choice, and below $100 it's hard to say who is better, but there is no real price point where it's a good idea to go AMD.
  5. In newegg the core i3 and a phenom II X4 960t are at $124, right now they have the same performance, the 960T can be overlcocked, it is a true quad core and the core i3 don't. Also, as a plus, I have that cpu unlocket to X6. That is to put an example. Their apus has something like 50% more graphic performance than intel.

    What I agree is than if amd doesn't come with something good they are dead in the future in the performance market. (sorry for the bad english)
  6. excrement !

    i'd eat bricks before i buy intel so whooopeee.
  7. Umm, Bulldozer is selling very well, in fact it's selling better than Phenom II what that was released.

    I think Bulldozer is pretty good, actually. It's just not a conventional multi-core implementation, which was a big gamble on AMD's part (one which may not pan out) -- but if the software begins to make use of it, which I think it will, we'll see some interesting stuff.

    I don't think AMD is really gunning for the top performance crown anymore, and frankly, I think it's ridiculous for people to expect them to try. Intel pulls down billions of dollars more than they do -- they just don't have the resources to compete with that. They need to focus, like they did with the Athlon 64, on what Intel is f**king up -- which is to say, graphics.

Similar Topics

Create an account or login to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
TechSpot Members
Login or sign up for free,
it takes about 30 seconds.
You may also...

Get complete access to the TechSpot community. Join thousands of technology enthusiasts that contribute and share knowledge in our forum. Get a private inbox, upload your own photo gallery and more.