Potato Judge
Posts: 161 +73
You guys are still doing 2700 & 2600 review/testing right? I'm eyeing the non x models for my new build.
" Still, it's well worth noting that the 2700X just managed to edge out the 7820X and that's a big deal."
Not really. Gamers are more likely to buy dual channel Intel chips for gaming, not quad channel HEDT chips. Price matters. And the different markets they are designed for matters. Ryzen could be sold as a work and play chip, but a 7820X is primarily for productivity. You could buy a 16T Ryzen chip because of its low price alone and go home and could get the same performance you desire for less. You don't buy a 7820X for those same reasons. You just don't. Common sense says so.
7820X was out before Ryzen and didn't have its memory compatibility problems. A lot of people are willing to pay extra for stability. Again, common sense.
I do not disagree with you; however, AMD, as I see it, did just enough of a job with gaming performance to keep their gaming customers satisfied. Benchmarks indicate that their lead over Intel in MT apps is significant, and this is where they need to be for the enterprise market.I don't agree with half of what you say amd taking their zen architecture for gaming/streaming and work related was a smart move.
I don't see alot people on the internet crying/complaining about pc gaming sucking on the ryzen platform. =/
Now for emulation such as dolphin, citra, a little bit of PCSX2, that I can understand because the ipc rate still sucks.
This is the main reason I steered into the kabylake platform and I am glad I did, but all in all amd has done some really good things lately.
"Overclocked, we see good gains from the second-gen Ryzen parts but again I'll have to revisit these tests once I've had time to overclock the Skylake-X CPUs."
Some of this was already done with your 8 core Royal Rumble. The gaming results can't be compared as you have used new games of course.
New drivers can change things, but I included the 1700 ad 1800x results @ 4ghz to show little actually has.
CINEBENCH MT:
Before: 1700@4ghz = 1765 / 7820@4ghz = 1733 / 7820@4.5 = 1935
Now : 1800x@4ghz = 1755 / 2700x stock = 1771 / 2700x@4.2 = 1879
7 ZIP Compress (x1000):
Before: 1700@4ghz = 37.6 / 7820@4ghz = 47.4 / 7820@4.5 = 52.5
Now : 1800x@4ghz = 39.8 / 2700x stock = 40.5 / 2700x@4.2 = 41.0
7 ZIP Decompress (x1000):
Before: 1700@4ghz = 53.3 / 7820@4ghz = 48.6 / 7820@4.5 = 53.5
Now : 1800x@4ghz = 53.6 / 2700x stock = 52.4 / 2700x@4.2 = 56.1
Blender (lower = better):
Before: 1700@4ghz = 22.8 / 7820@4ghz = 20.7 / 7820@4.5 = 18.5
Now : 1800x@4ghz = 22.5 / 2700x stock = 23.2 / 2700x@4.2 = 21.6
Corona (lower = better):
Before: 1700@4ghz = 123 / 7820@4ghz = 117 / 7820@4.5 = 106
Now : 1800x@4ghz = 122 / 2700x stock = 120 / 2700x@4.2 = 108
Maybe I'm the only one who busts out laughing about this fascination with games , you're an adult for Christ sake , get a life !!!!!!!!
I played games at one time but I grew up after reaching ten years old.
It wasn't that long ago AMD didn't have anything to offer faster than an i5. You should be happy that is no longer the case.
I agree there, just underwhelming compared to current Ryzen offering. Seems like a waste of time for them, why bother?