Apple pays $25 million DOJ settlement for prioritizing the hiring of immigrant workers

midian182

Posts: 9,745   +121
Staff member
A hot potato: Apple has agreed to pay $25 million to settle claims made by the US Department of Justice that said the Cupertino giant illegally favored hiring immigrant workers over US citizens and green card holders for certain jobs.

The issue relates to the permanent labor certification, or PERM program, which requires companies to prioritize and hire permanent US residents. Organizations must prove that there aren't enough US workers available and be certified by the Department of Labor and US Citizenship and Immigration Services if they want to prioritize hiring immigrants.

The DOJ said in a statement (via Reuters) that Apple did not advertise job openings that were eligible for PERM on its website, which it usually does for other positions. Moreover, the company required all applicants to mail paper applications even though it normally allows electronic submissions.

Apple Park

"These less effective recruitment procedures nearly always resulted in few or no applications to PERM positions from applicants whose permission to work does not expire," the department said.

Exactly which positions were affected by Apple's recruitment procedures or how Apple may have benefitted from them were not disclosed by the DOJ. It's noted that using foreign workers can often be cheaper than hiring those in the US, and immigrants who rely on employers for green card sponsorship are usually less likely to leave for a different job.

Apple admitted to "unintentionally" failing to follow the DOJ standard. "We have implemented a robust remediation plan to comply with the requirements of various government agencies as we continue to hire American workers and grow in the US," the company said.

In addition to handing over the $25 million, Apple has agreed to follow the rules when it comes to recruiting for PERM jobs. It will also be required to conduct more expansive recruitment and train its workers on anti-discrimination laws.

Apple prides itself on being an organization that values workforce diversity. It has released an Inclusion & Diversity report every year since 2014, the most recent of which showed its US Underrepresented Community Representation has reached 50%. The company also clamps down hard on anything it deems inappropriate. Just ask Tony Blevins, the former vice president of procurement for Apple who left the firm last year after making a comment about "big-breasted women" in a TikTok video.

Permalink to story.

 
I don't understand this whole prioritization thing when it comes to hiring.

It always seems to be based on the wrong criteria : gender because there aren't enough women in the company, immigrants because there aren't enough in the company, blacks /whites /whatever because there aren't enough in the company....?

Maybe they should hire based on one's actual capabilities? Maybe they should hire the right person for the right job looking at experience, studies and details that actually help that person be successful doing the job, regardless of whether they're an immigrant or not, as long as their status is legal within the country and they have the right to work there ?

Maybe they should stop being sexist and racist by using the criteria they're currently using?
 
I don't understand this whole prioritization thing when it comes to hiring.

It always seems to be based on the wrong criteria : gender because there aren't enough women in the company, immigrants because there aren't enough in the company, blacks /whites /whatever because there aren't enough in the company....?

Maybe they should hire based on one's actual capabilities? Maybe they should hire the right person for the right job looking at experience, studies and details that actually help that person be successful doing the job, regardless of whether they're an immigrant or not, as long as their status is legal within the country and they have the right to work there ?

Maybe they should stop being sexist and racist by using the criteria they're currently using?

The only criteria they care about is "Asians will work for less".
 
As 3ogdy said, hiring based on ethnicity or gender is inherently racist and sexist. That's just how the definitions of those words work.

Just because a company doesn't have a 50/50 ratio of men/women or white/non-white, doesn't mean that's NECESSARILY a bad thing. It could be due to racism/sexism, but if a company hires based on performance or qualifications and the demographics end up skewed like that, then so be it. Nothing wrong with that.
 
Back