China has a renewed plan to make a homegrown OS that could replace the need for Windows

[DSirius]

If UUSR won the war on its own, how did the American and British armies end up occupying half of Germany? It wasn't spying and stealing that got German scientists to work for the U.S. It was good old fashioned money. Are you attempting to make some sort of moral judgment about that? If so, how is it connected in any way to the substance of this article about open source software?

For someone who mentions propaganda in every sentence, you seem blissfully unaware of what propaganda has done to you.

When u do not have valid arguments u start skewing history? Good luck with that. In the beginning of the WW2 USA sold weapons, and other goods to Germany, after a while decided to be neutral, and at the end, when Germany already began to loose on the East front finally engaged in the war with it's army. I recognize propaganda regardless of country and I just expose it, like in this low quality article. Apology if u seemed offended, truth may anger propagandists or those who are exposed by it. And u confuse propaganda with debating a subject with valid arguments. I suggest to learn more about history. Learning (also self-educating) is the most valuable nowadays in this worldwide informational society. And I am a firm believer in debating subjects with valid arguments.

 

[toooooot]

Step one, copy linux, step two, name it something like great china or wall.
step three, boast china's great might and advantages in software development.

 

[Sir Sparkles]

China doesn't develop or create anything. They copy, innovate and mass produce. Anyone set onto the task of creating anything there will immediately go out looking to what they can steal\borrow\copy to use.

Absolutely zero chance they can code an OS from scratch.

 

[TempleOrion]

China doesn't develop or create anything. They copy, innovate and mass produce.

And innovation is a bad thing because...? Innovating is *by definition* creating something new *sigh*

PS Merkins' propensity to denigrate, underestimate and completely misunderstand their competitors always lands them in hot water in the long run - and they never, ever seem to understand that their wilful complacency and concomitant blind belief in their own exceptionalism is to blame...

 

[Sir Sparkles]

And innovation is a bad thing because...? Innovating is *by definition* creating something new *sigh*

I never said it was bad, who said that?
Innovate by definition is "make changes in something established".
*sigh*

 

[ZedRM]

Unfortunately for USA (maybe for the rest of the world too), infamous USSR won the war against Germany regardless of american propaganda (USA contribution was like 25% at the end). So USA are the best in spying and stealing, than USSR (now Russia), followed by miles back by China nowadays. To establish the straight facts. And somehow u think that this is justifiable? What the rest of the world is aware now is how disgusting and boring american propaganda become. Propaganda in general is disgusting and boring but hey, here USA is world number 1, otherwise USA began its downfall long ago.

Historical data does not support your statement.

 

[Vanderkaum037]

When u do not have valid arguments u start skewing history? Good luck with that. In the beginning of the WW2 USA sold weapons, and other goods to Germany, after a while decided to be neutral, and at the end, when Germany already began to loose on the East front finally engaged in the war with it's army. I recognize propaganda regardless of country and I just expose it, like in this low quality article. Apology if u seemed offended, truth may anger propagandists or those who are exposed by it. And u confuse propaganda with debating a subject with valid arguments. I suggest to learn more about history. Learning (also self-educating) is the most valuable nowadays in this worldwide informational society. And I am a firm believer in debating subjects with valid arguments.

Are you telling me that U.S. and British armies did not occupy France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Italy, North Africa, West Germany, Austria, etc.?

Are you telling me that hundreds of thousands of western allies did not give their lives to overthrow Nazi Germany?

I think you are pathologically incapable of staying on topic.

The U.S. sold weapons and war materiel to Great Britain, China, the Soviet Union--first with cash and carry, then lend lease (on credit) as a matter of state policy.

NATO (most of Europe), South Korea, Japan, and others are allied with the U.S. today, right now. Who stands with China? North Korea maybe?

 

[DSirius]

Are you telling me that U.S. and British armies did not occupy France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Italy, North Africa, West Germany, Austria, etc.?

Are you telling me that hundreds of thousands of western allies did not give their lives to overthrow Nazi Germany?

I think you are pathologically incapable of staying on topic.

The U.S. sold weapons and war materiel to Great Britain, China, the Soviet Union--first with cash and carry, then lend lease (on credit) as a matter of state policy.

NATO (most of Europe), South Korea, Japan, and others are allied with the U.S. today, right now. Who stands with China? North Korea maybe?

Well perhaps, or clearly, u did not read carefully what I wrote. I stated that USA had a contribution in WW2 against Germany, just that a little one, like 25%. History sources approximate it's contribution against Germany between 25 to 35%, those which claim more than 25% are US sources close to propaganda and are not backed even by it's "allies" like UK and France. USSR had the biggest contribution, more than 50%, and had the biggest casualties. Even if u like it or not this is the inconvenient truth, and I can assure u that for many countries it was an unpleasant, terrible one, like in being occupied by USSR and transformed in it's satellite countries, so no point in skewing history.

Who really won the second world war?

By Sean Healy On May 8, 1945, Marshal Georgi Zhukov, supreme commander of the Soviet armed forces; General William Tedder, Britain's air chief marshal; General Carl Spaatz, commander of the US strategic airforce; and General Jean de Lattre de

www.greenleft.org.au

US involved on European front with troops against Germany on 6 June 1944 - it was called D-Day & Normandy, so at the end of the war and only after USSR turned the fate of the War and was clear that Germany lost all and USSR won the war against Germany.
I am open to debate and I advice u to keep conversation civilized especially when u do not have valid arguments or u are not enough informed on topic.
Hope u get my hints about debating a topic in an intelligent manner.

 

[mailpup]

Back on topic please. Thank you.