Crysis 2 GPU & CPU Performance Test

It's just amazing how many people have pirated this piece of software getting the graphic settings all wrong (you know it's high, very high and extreme in the properly released game). Way to go guys. At least don't whine it sucks, you have no right to do it since you didn't pay a penny for it.

You are mistaken
In the Retail DVD version (v1.0) the graphic options are these;
Gamer, Advanced, Hardcore

With patch v1.1 applied they change to these options;
High, Very High, Extreme

This probably relies on which locale your release is, mine is;
Deutch, English, Español, Français & Türk
 
How you can get an average fps of 23 with the E8500 ? My E8200 stock / GTX 460 run this game at 35-40 fps on Extreme setting (1680x1050). Looks like your LGA775 test machine is messed up. Or 23 fps was the minimum fps ?
 
Can we expect dx11 benchmarks when the patch comes out?
IT will be nice if You compare sli crossfire performance, especially gtx460, 560, hd 6870, hd 6850, hd 5850.
 
Running water cooled overclocked gtx 480 and i7 920 @ 4ghz. Crapz on the game doesn't drop a frame under 60 on extreme. gg well developed game.
 
Help me to understand this joke, irregardless of my lack of gaming experience....... ;) :rolleyes:

Pretty much what sheena said. Add to this that the 'extreme' setting is a joke as this is 2011 and it is a DX9 game. It's not even taken DX9 to its full extent with none of the features of DX11 or even DX 10/10.1. If 60 FPS is so grand, what will be the frame rate when/if they throw in a DX11 patch and your CPU/GPU has to contend with Ambient Occlusion, tessellation, texture based shadowing etc etc. Not to mention that when released it ran like **** on any machine trying to make use of CF or SLI. The game looks like hell, and is a phone booth point A to point B shooter.....Nice job indeed.<<<extreme sarcasm.
 
OK, thanks to both of you for clearing that up for me!

I think the point that could be gleaned from this is that our "guest", basically felt a need to stop by and tell us all about what a great and powerful computer he believes, (or she believes), has.

It would seem that game performance was a subterfuge, to allow its on board windbag free operation in plain sight.

Did I get this right?
 
OK, thanks to both of you for clearing that up for me!

I think the point that could be gleaned from this is that our "guest", basically felt a need to stop by and tell us all about what a great and powerful computer he, (or she), has.

It would seem that game performance was a subterfuge, to allow its on board windbag free operation in plain sight.

Did I get this right?

I think so...but why talk up your machine under a guest account? ...unless it was tha general going covert after Chef outed him :haha:
 
Give credit where credit is due.
I think so...but why talk up your machine under a guest account? ...unless it was tha general going covert after Chef outed him :haha:
A the very least, I was holding the nail, as DBZ hammered it into the coffin
 
Just yankin' your chain G.

BTW: They say a pictures worth a thousand words...
tumblr_ljcbwldt471qajh0xo1_400.jpg
 
I think so...but why talk up your machine under a guest account? ...unless it was tha general going covert after Chef outed him :haha:
Nah, it wasn't him. Think about it, an i7-920 rig won't be new to "Tha General", for at least another 5 or 6 years.
 
Back