This has nothing to do what with people believe.
Indeed it doesn't. It has everything to do with your argument using groups of people to argue that your idea of nVidia being better is true, which is what the wikipedia link perfectly described... Don't deny it now, because that is the ONLY argument you have. It's all about large groups of people;
Its common knowledge anywhere
You heard it here first folks.
Millions of people are wrong, and a few AMD fanboys on Techspot are right...
But I guess you guys know more then millions of people who purchased their card
That must be why 90% of people use Nvidia GPU's at every price point
90% of the market at every price point,
And that argument was just proven to be a fallacy. What else do you have? Oh right, nothing. Let's continue anyway then.... Because this nonsense needs to be exposed.
This is only about what is, and why it is.
Really? Let me guess. You have the perfect reason why, even though you yourself admit that you are completely biased and cherry picking to support your argument and dismissing anything that is inconvenient...;
those links and countless threads, its all horse poop, no substance or truth to it at all
A couple vids of Nvidia cards having issues does nothing to combat anything I've posted
You can link folks having issues with GTX/RTX GPU's.
But you cannot argue a single point I've said about AMD issues
You haven't countered anything, because you cannot.
It doesn't become more obvious how biased you are and how much you cherry pick. And that is without all the anti-AMD drivel that you spouted this entire thread.
"Cherry picking, suppressing evidence, or the fallacy of incomplete evidence is the act of pointing to individual cases or data that seem to confirm a particular position while ignoring a significant portion of related cases or data that may contradict that position. "
en.wikipedia.org
Once product is superior to the other, because of this, one product sells more then the other. The proof is in the sales, there is no argument to be had here, it has nothing to do with belief, your analogy does not apply.
"
Confirmation bias is the tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information in a way that affirms one's prior beliefs or hypotheses.
[1] It is a type of
cognitive bias and a systematic error of
inductive reasoning. People display this bias when they gather or remember information selectively, or when they interpret it in a
biased way.
People also tend to interpret ambiguous evidence as supporting their existing position. "
en.wikipedia.org
Discrete market share and Steam results fully support any claim I've made and mean more then 100 youtube videos and 1000 links to threads. Saying those results don't correlate is just wishful thinking.
"
Belief perseverance (also known as
conceptual conservatism[1]) is maintaining a belief despite new information that firmly contradicts it.
[2] Such beliefs may even be strengthened when others attempt to present evidence debunking them, a phenomenon known as the
backfire effect "
en.wikipedia.org
And lastly, and more importantly, your circular reasoning... You're using the Steam results to argue that nVidia is better than AMD, and also saying that AMD needs to be better for the Steam results to change;
On average Nvidia hardware/software has been, is now, and will continue to be much more stable/superior. Until that changes, the Steam results won't change either.
but nothing that explains or disputes the fact that Nvidia GPU's on average are superior at every level and the market share/steam hardware results proves every word of that.
"
begging the question is an
informal fallacy that occurs when an argument's premises assume the truth of the conclusion, instead of supporting it. It is a type of
circular reasoning: an argument that requires that the desired conclusion be true.
-------
To "beg the question" is to put forward an argument whose validity requires that its own conclusion be true.
Also called
petitio principii, the
fallacy is an attempt to support a claim with a premise that itself presupposes the claim.
[8] It is an attempt to prove a proposition while simultaneously taking the proposition for granted."
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
Long story short. All your posts are a list of fallacies. No logic whatsoever. Emotional repetition and useless drivel.
