Games don't kill people....people kill people. Millions of people play similar games and they don't go around shooting people.

In regards to the 17 year-old who went around killing sixteen people, I don't think the games Far Cry 2 and Counter Strike was the problem. This person was obviously disturbed and had deeper issues.

For all we know, he could of watched a baseball game and taken a bat to sixteen people's head. So banning these type of games won't solve the problem of these psychotic, demented people.

Indeed. I second that thought. I wonder if they're just getting sick of the WW2 games. ;P lol

All this stuff is so highly debatable... Can't really say that games do not contribute to violence - I have no reliable data to base it on - and don't have any evidence to the contrary. Just being a fan of the game doesn't mean a person would go and shoot a bunch of people. On the other hand who know how the game affects a young mind. That being said, what about freedom of speech? Europe starts to strongly remind me of the USSR.

Most countries in Europe are Socialist countries. The people have let the governments get out of hand, much like here in the US. A video game, I don't think, is attributable to freedom of speech, because they're sellable products but even saying that (and I don't think sellable is a word, but you get the idea) European countries do not have constitutions protecting the rights of people for their freedoms, like we do in the US. Freedom of speech, religion, etc... are not universal human rights, unfortunately.

I still just find it odd that it always seems to be age related to these shootings, just because the shooter is not an adult it makes him more likely to be brainwashed by video games in to thinking its alright to kill? I don't think it has anything to do with the games hes playing but more the people he socialises with and the rest of his living invironment. It's funny how millions of other people of similar age play thses games without killing their friends and or family. Whats not to say that some one in their thirties wasn't influenced by tv sitcom in to believing they could get away with murder, those shows seem to be left alone. Maybe it's just me, I spent the better part of my youth playing GTA and FPS without ever considering actually stealing a car and going on a murderous rampage.

Correct me if I am wrong, but don't Germans have all this filthy porn stuff that they seem to think is OK?

http://www.thelifeingermany.com/2008/04/germanys-attitude-towards-sex.html

So they are being selectively prudish now?

Germany is ultra-sensitive to violence stemming from the 107 million casualties caused by them cranking up WWI and WWII. Especially after the fall of Nazi Germany. The Germans spend a lot of time and energy distancing themselves from that and anything even remotely considered violent.

Do violent games make people want to pick up guns and go shoot other people? Of course not. But for an already disturbed person, I don't doubt that the "glory" effect of shooting virtual people ala Far Cry 2 or Fallout 3 couldn't have some (but not all) influence.

I just want to see what Germany's excuse will be the first time a mass murder takes place and there are no video games to blame.

Computer games don't cause violence.

Porn doesn't cause rape.

People cause these things.

Per Hansson, you're confusing laws for constitutional freedoms/rights. In addition to this, please refer to the several ways in which the UK and other countries in Europe actually prohibit protests on certain subjects and ban people who are vocally controversial.

Some examples of the awesome freedoms in Europe:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/libertycentral/2009/mar/06/freedom-of-speech
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/philipjohnston/4604985/Whatever-happened-to-free-speech.html
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/16-banned-from-britain-named-and-shamed-1679127.html
(Now, I'm not one for allowing terrorists or murderers into my country... but Michael Savage? A doctor? A conservative radio host? Someone taken out of context on a day-to-day basis? C'mon...)

The news dictates differently. Freedom of speech does exist, but to what end? Especially when they can pick speech apart and say what's legal and what's not... There is no constitution, as I've shown this forum, for the country of France, just like most European countries, that dictate the freedoms of the people. Like France, the UK has a constitution that dictates how the country is governed, but that's about it. The apparent freedoms come from the "European Convention of Human Rights." Obviously there are stipulations... when it comes down to the way a country is governed. In fact, it seems that the government laws/regulations of a country supersede the Human Rights document, so how effective is it, really?

And here I forgot we were talking about Germany... they have a whole slew of additional issues. ;/

This seems like a knee-jerk reaction based on emotions rather than evidence. This silly search for a scapegoat happens every time a school shooting occurs. I guess it wasn't violent music this time.

At any rate people whose lives have been ruined need something to fill their time so they can pretend like they're preventing it from happening again.And politicians need to make a name for themselves. Let's not give them too much grief.

This is such a touchy subject...but again, I am left with thinking this is another example of a "shotgun approach" (pardon the pun): Rather than addressing and fixing the root issues, countries are looking at the obscure and taking aim at addressing the issue by some sort of non-specific blasting.

Now, that being said, I would be a little irresponsible to say violent video games have absolutely nothing to do with kids going of the deep end...factually, I believe there may be a very small influence there but it is certainly not the catalyst for them going out and performing mass murder. As some have said, their act stems from a deep rooted psycological issue that was likely there before their video game "addictions".

So, what's the proper solution? IMHO, it's not some broad-base approach like "bans" but a proper addressing of the issue. Mental health is the issue that needs to be addressed. That, my friends, starts at home...with the parents. Why are teens/pre-teens playing mature games in the first place? And if parents allow this, they should be monitoring their kids' activities a little closer to ensure their kids arent exhibiting some unhealthy attitudes - if they are, get them some professional help. Also, there must be stronger enforcement for who buys these games...under 18 purchasing a rated "M' game at your local game store is what needs to be corrected. If parents are okay with their kids playing those games, they need to be the one purchasing them...then they need to be willing to have better interaction and responsibility with their kids in the first place.

Global bans may be, in government eyes, the "right" approach. But it's just a band-aid covering up a (mental) issue that is still there. It also punishes everyone else who purchases/plays/enjoys that sort of media entertainment without having any kind of influence and confusion with reality versus virtual reality.

You're allowed to deny 9/11 and the holocaust all you want in America. You can blame the government and claim it's a conspiracy all you'd like, and people do on a daily basis. It's not illegal to make such claims, just as it's not illegal to hold KKK parades and meetings, or to be associated with the Communist political party.

You're being fooled by watching anything created by Michael Moore, as he's produced so much controversial crap, based on lies, rumor and the blatant use of actors in his "documentaries." If Michael Moore wasn't allowed to say the things he does or ask the questions he does, then why is he able to produce a movie about his relentless and ridiculous questions... and gain wealth by doing so?

I'm not touting the "greatness" of America... I'm just stating facts. I'm also not stating that European countries are inferior or "worse." We have a written constitution that differs from many countries in the world, stating specifically, the freedoms of the citizens of this country... and the limitations of government (which is something Obama hates). The founding fathers of this country understood corruption of government, as they fled Britain and seceded from that nation for a reason. They understood the importance of freedom and a people's inaliable rights.

Anyway, the only "atrocious" change that Bush made was the PATRIOT act... which infringes on our rights to privacy, which I disagree with... but honestly, it won't affect you unless you're planning on terrorizing the country. That can be amended, however, and hopefully will in the future.

Don't be so defensive. If you're European, I don't mean to insult you, I'm just stating facts and pulling links supporting it. =/

Germany has been trying to repair their image for over half a century now. For a long time it looked as if they had made alot of progress. Now it seems as if they're moving backwards. First book burning, now banning video games. Interesting. Say "No" to big government.

Hey guys can you please stop commenting about everything in Germany if you don't even know anything about it aside from Wikipedia. I was born in Germany. In Germany and most of western Europe, sexual themes are looked upon way more lightly than Violence. Like someone already pointed out, Germany started to condemn violence after World War 2, because the rest of the world had gotten a violent image from Germany. The same thing just not as bad happened here in the US after the 60's-80's with the sexual revolution. That might be why America has such a big censorship on Television items. After watching the German news past the school shooting (as said in article) I noticed that a lot of politicians AND citizens started to blame Video games. Of course I agree with most people here saying that it would be a bad idea to ban video games. i would much rather look at higher punishments for people who don't lock their guns out with a kid that went to a psychiatric because of suicidal thoughts (This is what happened to the kid that committed the school shooting). But that's just my point of view...

Regardless of any discussion of right in various countries, the problem with Germany's approach is that they attempt to distance themselves from their violent, totalitarian past...by dealing with anything related to violence in a near-totalitarian fashion. It's completely hypocritical.

If it accomplishes anything at all, it's just proving that that is how they still function, and always will. Just showing the world that they don't like violence isn't the half of it, as they make every effort to deal with things they don't like in an extremely controlling manner.