also @ TechSpot: Bill Gates is once again the richest person in the world

Google Chrome and Chromium to get new logos

Discussion in 'TechSpot News and Comments' started by Emil, Mar 16, 2011.

Post New Reply
  1. Rick TechSpot Staff Posts: 6,247   +37

    The old one is machine-like and almost intimidating. I think the improvement here are the new 'friendly' and 'pleasant' looks of the logo.

    In graphics arts terms, the old one displays superior technical proficiency. Fancy logos don't always (And usually do not) make the best brand images though.
  2. This shows how hard it is to design for clients sometimes. What you think they would like an run with is the exact opposite. Sometimes its best to save those brainstorm concepts,.... they may just be your lucky stars waiting to shine.
  3. Both are awful !!!
  4. matrix86 TechSpot Enthusiast Posts: 761

    I raise my glass to you.
  5. ramonsterns TechSpot Enthusiast Posts: 752   +12

    True, a simple logo can work well, if not better than a complicated one. But going from a 3D-like logo with reflection (like it was chromed, get it?) to a generic, flat multicolored pokeball is not the way to do it.
  6. Trillionsin TechSpot Enthusiast Posts: 888   +10

    Who gives a rats ***!!! Silly logos... haha
     
  7. nismo91 TechSpot Maniac Posts: 969

    looks like from 3D going to 2D.
  8. Lokalaskurar TechSpot Enthusiast Posts: 616

    The new logos are much, much uglier than the original. Tasteless and surely some kind of sick joke. No? Gosh d*rnit, Google.

    There are better looking, vector-designed logos of Chrome, but these new ones are in fact very ugly.
  9. Relic TechSpot Chancellor Posts: 1,368   +11

    Meh...I like the old one much more then the new, it just looks so plain in comparison.
  10. MrAnderson TechSpot Enthusiast Posts: 392

    Yes the old ones look better because they have the 3D eye-candy going for them, but they probably broke many of the rules in regard to Logo design.

    The newer ones in comparison are blah, but they make for a cleaner (sure boring) logo and still are recognizable (just not in black and white) from the originals. But isn't google about clean and simple when it comes to their designs?
  11. ramonsterns TechSpot Enthusiast Posts: 752   +12

    As I said, simply logos aren't bad. Just this one in particular is terrible.
  12. yowanvista Newcomer, in training Posts: 76

    I like the original one
  13. Nima304 TechSpot Enthusiast Posts: 202   +13

    The old logo is a lot better. The new one sucks.
  14. Like most of you, I prefer the old one. I am a current Graphic Communications student and although the new logo presents more of that simple, flat look, what I love about the old one is that they broke away from that simple flat look that everyone uses.

    TLDR: Old version is unique, defining and illustrative. New version is boring, flat and looks like a cheap knockoff.

    -Dave G
  15. Jibberish18 TechSpot Maniac Posts: 427   +7

    The old logo DEFINITELY looks better but to be honest the new one fits in PERFECTLY with the browser. It's just simple and clean.
  16. Jibberish18 TechSpot Maniac Posts: 427   +7

    I also wanted to add, it would be nice if their was an in between.
  17. nismo91 TechSpot Maniac Posts: 969

    hold on. i just noticed that in first pic, the new logo seems trash with the color fade effect. looks much better on the about google chrome image.
  18. Ivan Franco TechSpot Staff

    I prefer the old logo, in despite of the minimal style of chrome, but its not ugly at all
  19. Wagan8r TechSpot Maniac Posts: 520   +15

    It's like they forgot what they named their product.
  20. TrekExpert TechSpot Enthusiast Posts: 104

    What?!?! NO!!! That's awful, what were they thinking?