They compare 4 thread CPU (4 core, I know) to 12 thread CPU, because of the price. And when applicable (favor to AMD), they make sure to mention that it's a 4 core part. But only when that favors AMD.
There are a lot of comparisons made, but I don't expect them to be fair, unbiased and such. But as far as video games go, I am yet to come across a website with a reviewer that actually sees those benchmarks as anything but a chore. Understandably.
I am also yet to see a post or hear anyone saying i3 (of any kind) would smoke Ryzen 2600. I did hear that, as a 4 core part, it will "smoke" 2200G/2400G" at the time i3 (9100) wasn't even out, and 2200G was $90.
But I don't think any website would run such a test since it would infuriate AMD fans and AMD. It would show how even with 7nm, their core performance is not really that good, they need SMT AND lower prices to compete with "outdated" 14nm from intel.
However, I welcome those lower prices, it nudged intel and that's a good thing.