Internet speed to low

Can you tell me the download and upload speeds? I am at school and the sites you have the images on are blocked.
 
Speed Test

Download:0.50 Mb/s

Upload:0.50 Mb/s

Pingtest

Packet loss: 0%

ping:214ms

jitter:4 ms

Your Grade:C
 
What are your download and upload speeds your paying for?
Reset your Modem
Reset your Router
If you still have slower speeds, have the ISP send a hit to your Modem and they can tell you more about what's going on.
 
i have a 500 kbps plan and how to reset your modem and router?

how to i install a network adapter driver i have realtek pcie fe family controller

and now there is a new problem guys every night my internet disconnects between 12 to 1pm and doesn't come back till next day
 
Uhm, 500 kbps is the same thing as .50 Mbps ...

You can reset your modem and adapter by unplugging them for at least 20 seconds, but I don't think that will help as you are getting what you are paying for.
 
Some modems have on the back a pin hole for reset. But 500kps is about right. So you're okay, you can't get more from what you pay for. If offered in your are for higher speeds you have to pay for it.
 
Pingtest Packet loss: 0% ping:214ms

Don't know of your connection type {dial-up, dls, cable, satellite} but that's a lousy ping time.

From Southern Calif, U.S.A to Techspot.com, I'm getting a ping time=53ms, and that's over
13 intermediate hops.
 
Usually only by improving your access to the ISP - - what kind of service are you using now and what other choices are available to you?
 
Here is what I am using. Works great.

Plan: BBG FN Combo 600

Bandwidth : Upto 2 Mbps
Monthly Charges : Rs 600
Download/Upload Limit per month : 2.5 GB
Night Unlimited (0200-0800 Hrs) : Yes
Telephone fixed monthly charges : NIL
Free Calls :250
 
Hi jobeard,

I stand corrected. The plan I suggested, will not reduce the ping time.

I thought that main reason for the high ping time was Queuing, especially during the peak hours.

The only thing I had to work on was that it was a 0.5 MBPS connection.

Too many people opt for the BB Home UL 750 or BB Home Combo UL 750, getting lured by the unlimited usage.

Only, later do they realize how slow it is.

I felt that there would be a qualitative difference, other than just the bandwidth, amongst the different plans. This was based on the expectation of higher priority i.e. smaller queues.

I had never checked my own ping, but the bandwidth was fine, and my primary objectives for using the internet were reasonably well satisfied.

Hence I suggested a change in a plan.

I still think that the higher priced Business Plans might have a lower ping time. But then, I could be wrong again.

Anyway, I ran the ping and tracert commands and here are the (appalling) results:

Pinging techspot.com [74.55.96.66] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 74.55.96.66: bytes=32 time=382ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.55.96.66: bytes=32 time=375ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.55.96.66: bytes=32 time=374ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.55.96.66: bytes=32 time=375ms TTL=50
Ping statistics for 74.55.96.66:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 374ms, Maximum = 382ms, Average = 376ms

Tracing route to techspot.com [74.55.96.66] over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 47 ms 46 ms 46 ms 117.197.0.1
2 46 ms 46 ms 46 ms 218.248.166.166
3 296 ms 312 ms 312 ms 121.244.68.77.static-lvsb.vsnl.net.in [121.244.68.77]
4 327 ms 327 ms 327 ms if-3-3.mcore3.L78-London.as6453.net [195.219.144.61]
5 327 ms 327 ms 327 ms 80.231.131.33
6 * * * Request timed out.
7 312 ms 327 ms 312 ms Vlan551.icore1.NTO-NewYork.as6453.net [209.58.26.82]
8 327 ms 327 ms 327 ms pos-1-9-0-0-cr01.newyork.ny.ibone.comcast.net [68.86.86.41]
9 328 ms 327 ms 327 ms pos-0-12-0-0-cr01.ashburn.va.ibone.comcast.net [68.86.85.29]
10 343 ms 327 ms 327 ms pos-1-8-0-0-cr01.atlanta.ga.ibone.comcast.net [68.86.87.90]
11 468 ms 468 ms 468 ms pos-1-14-0-0-cr01.dallas.tx.ibone.comcast.net [68.86.85.153] 12 468 ms 468 ms 468 ms pos-0-2-0-0-pe01.1950stemmons.tx.ibo
ne.comcast.net [68.86.86.150]
13 468 ms 468 ms 468 ms theplanet-cr01.dallas.tx.ibone.comcast.net [75.149.228.2]
14 374 ms 359 ms 374 ms e1-1.ibr01.hstntx2.networklayer.com [70.87.253.50]
15 359 ms 359 ms 359 ms te2-2.dsr02.hstntx2.networklayer.com [74.55.252.38]
16 359 ms 359 ms 374 ms po2.car06.hstntx2.networklayer.com [74.55.252.114]
17 359 ms 359 ms 359 ms server1.techspot.com [74.55.96.66]
Trace complete.

So the bottleneck is quite apparent.

Just googled this up. How does it sound to you ?

T1 lease circuits - best quality in the market, can give you ping time less then 10ms. dam expensive.

MPLS circuits - good enough for most live application. ping time less then 50ms. half the cost of T1 yet realiable enough to even run voice over it. if voice can run, application definately no issue.

http://in.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100812000053AAS7a1k
 
Back