Is AMD finally targeting Nvidia? Radeon RX 7800 XT & RX 7700 XT launch details, FSR 3,...

Status
Not open for further replies.
I've used Nvidia for yours, never had an AMD card, but I know for a fact that Nvidia has some pretty bad drivers out there.

Nvidia has released some ghetto drivers over the years and they still do. For those that claim AMD drivers are broken, they're either biased or they just had a sour experience.

Nvidia has released several drivers where they burned out cards.
They have had drivers that cause high CPU usage.
They have had drivers where multi monitor setups wouldn't work properly.
They have had drivers were SLI configurations wouldn't work properly.
They have had drivers were all shadows had green pixilation.
They have had drivers were video playback would fail.
They have had drivers that caused crashes.
....and the list goes on.

You can't claim AMD has bad/broken drivers without pointing your finger at Nvidia for having just as many driver issues.
Difference is nvidia solves those issues fast. With AMD, it might take years. The high power draw at idle has been an issue since 2012, and it still is today, lol. Not being able to play some old games on amd cards has been an issue since forever and it still is. Currently can't play divine divinity on my laptop (680m and 6700s, tried wtih both), plays just fine on 4 different nvidia cards ive tried. Go figure.
 
You can't claim AMD has bad/broken drivers without pointing your finger at Nvidia for having just as many driver issues.
That's true, however, I'm going to base my experiences on a 5700XT and 1080Ti.

Nvidia fix their issues, and usually quite quick as well. The 1080Ti today is solid driver wise, doesn't crash, I don't have any issues with it.

5700XT on the other hand, I still get regular crashing issues, I don't understand how it's still soo crashy after all these years.

Baulders Gate 3 as a brilliant example, Nvidia 1080Ti, not crashed once because of the Nvidia driver, 5700XT, at least seven times. Probably more but haven't counted them.
 
Difference is nvidia solves those issues fast. With AMD, it might take years. The high power draw at idle has been an issue since 2012, and it still is today, lol. Not being able to play some old games on amd cards has been an issue since forever and it still is. Currently can't play divine divinity on my laptop (680m and 6700s, tried wtih both), plays just fine on 4 different nvidia cards ive tried. Go figure.
Playing with laptop. Games won't work.

Go figure.
That's true, however, I'm going to base my experiences on a 5700XT and 1080Ti.

Nvidia fix their issues, and usually quite quick as well. The 1080Ti today is solid driver wise, doesn't crash, I don't have any issues with it.

5700XT on the other hand, I still get regular crashing issues, I don't understand how it's still soo crashy after all these years.

Baulders Gate 3 as a brilliant example, Nvidia 1080Ti, not crashed once because of the Nvidia driver, 5700XT, at least seven times. Probably more but haven't counted them.
Those 5700XT "driver" problems are funny since no reviewer has ever been able to duplicate them. And still you seem to be sure that's driver problem and not something else? Since, if that really was driver issue, I should have had hard time with 5600XT. But no major problems in over three years.
 
What is the issue with playing with a laptop? LOL
Build quality sucks. Drivers are often outdated if other than OEM ones won't work. Unless doing clean install, OS is bloated with pre-installed crap. Heat and cooling are always issue...

Desktops rule on gaming. If I have Divine Divinity somewhere (at least I have something like that) I'll test if it works with AMD card ;)
 
Find quite awkward that among all of what AMD announced today, Tim seems unimpressed at least, or nit picking at its best.
AMD FSR3 may be a huge blow to Nvidia DLSS3 RTX 4xxxx "exclusivity" which shows again how much anticonsumers and antigamers Nvidia is with its own buyers. And this may explain better why Nvidia rushed to announce DLSS3.5 available for all their RTX cards. And why they called it 3.5. To confuse gamers that they have something available for all their RTX cards, just that not DLSS3?
This may be too late for Nvidia to full gamers from now on. Because AMD is making FSR3 available for more Nvidia cards, RTX2xxx, 3xxx and 4xxx, than Nvidia did with its DLSS3 which is available only for RTX4xxx cards.
Again, quite awkard for Tim to disregard Nvidia DLSS black pattern, artificial market segmentation, not saying a word about this, instead of condemning it or at least acknowledging it. Keeping this loudly silence about it, just to be more favorable for Nvidia, is in detriment of gamers and Techspot readers who are not informed about this.
AMD making FSR3 available for all Nvidia RTX cards could have been easily the frontline title for a more interesting news presentation. Instead redears get "silentio stampa" awkward silence when Nvidia is caught in its own wrongdoings.
But hey, we get an "unimpressed" subtitle like: "Bottom line: Reasonable, not super amazing must-buys, not awfully inadequate models, but just okay".
This is what many can call it a wasted tech journalist opportunity, when it could easily be like:
"AMD is coming big after Nvidia, offering FSR3 for all RTX gen cards 2xxx, 3xxx, 4xxx while Nvidia made DLSS3 available only for its RTX 4xxx cards".

Also 7800XT looks promising, let's see if independent benchmarks will confirm.
On paper, both 7700XT and 7800XT are better offerings than Nvidia counterparts, let's see if benchmarks will confirm.
There is nothing fsr3 will do to dlss3 exclusivity, as nvidia planned to use dedicated hardware for it, while AMD had to improvise and resort to using async for fsr3, which they even know will be hard if a game already uses it for something else.
7800xt looks promising how ? Looks like it will be same or worse than 6800xt at 550 EUR, while 6800xt sells at 520, with no extra features vs rdna2 despite having dedicated ML hardware on die that will be left unused.
Tim or HUB are not seeking opportunity to advertise AMD, as they are not on their payroll. If you don't understand why tech journalists do not have double standards for AMD, you're probably one of these people who complained about Tim questioning AMD about their shady sponsorships.
 
I've used Nvidia for yours, never had an AMD card, but I know for a fact that Nvidia has some pretty bad drivers out there.

Nvidia has released some ghetto drivers over the years and they still do. For those that claim AMD drivers are broken, they're either biased or they just had a sour experience.

Nvidia has released several drivers where they burned out cards.
They have had drivers that cause high CPU usage.
They have had drivers where multi monitor setups wouldn't work properly.
They have had drivers were SLI configurations wouldn't work properly.
They have had drivers were all shadows had green pixilation.
They have had drivers were video playback would fail.
They have had drivers that caused crashes.
....and the list goes on.

You can't claim AMD has bad/broken drivers without pointing your finger at Nvidia for having just as many driver issues.
This argument is pure "whataboutism" and does nothing to address the argument. By presenting this, you are admitting to AMD having bad drivers and you have nothing to refute that argument with, so you have to drag attention to a different subject.

Do better.
the only time I had problems with an ATI/AMD gpu was with the 5700xt, and I use their hardware since the 3D rage pro from 1998... I build a cr@pload of PCs since it's my job and even my customers never had any problems... but better blaming the product and not ourselves ... like most ppl not using DDU or cleaning old drivers from the previous GPU when switching from NV to AMD this causing 80%+ of the BS of amd drivers = bad... cause you know, you would had the same problems when switching to NV from AMD, and what you would do then ? blaming NV for sh!t drivers too ?
Leaving out the evergreen stability problems, the GCN black screen bug, and the frame time bugs, the fact you bring up DDU is hilarious. AMD drivers are SO good that you have to use a third party to uninstall them correctly, something nvidia fixed over two decades ago.
I noticed that too. If anything they seem to always criticize or nit picks AMD more. To be fair they do it to Nvidia too but not to the extent as much as they do to AMD.
Oh so now they're AMD bashing? You guys always seem to find conspiracies to confirm your own biases. Tech spot and HUB have been accused of shilling for/spreading hate against AMD, nVidia, Intel, Apple, and Google.
 
Build quality sucks. Drivers are often outdated if other than OEM ones won't work. Unless doing clean install, OS is bloated with pre-installed crap. Heat and cooling are always issue...

Desktops rule on gaming. If I have Divine Divinity somewhere (at least I have something like that) I'll test if it works with AMD card ;)
I have a ghost install of windows, latest drivers, runs everything great actually besides old games cause amd drivers are awesome
 
There is nothing fsr3 will do to dlss3 exclusivity, as nvidia planned to use dedicated hardware for it, while AMD had to improvise and resort to using async for fsr3, which they even know will be hard if a game already uses it for something else.
7800xt looks promising how ? Looks like it will be same or worse than 6800xt at 550 EUR, while 6800xt sells at 520, with no extra features vs rdna2 despite having dedicated ML hardware on die that will be left unused.
Tim or HUB are not seeking opportunity to advertise AMD, as they are not on their payroll. If you don't understand why tech journalists do not have double standards for AMD, you're probably one of these people who complained about Tim questioning AMD about their shady sponsorships.
Simple. 7800XT looks more promising than Nvidia 4070.
And no point in speculating more, let's wait the real benchmarks from reviewers and make an informed opinion. The results may be in AMD favor, or in nvidia favor, in nobody favor or everybody favor. Personally I would be pleased to see both Nvidia and AMD starting to lower prices for their videocards due to 7700Xt and 7800XT vs 4060ti and 4070 competition.
 
Last edited:
Just wondering if this FSR3 will also help integrated Zen graphics also. If this works the way they say it does (all gpu's) then this will be a massive kick in the nuts towards Nvidia and Intel.
 
Do better.
Leaving out the evergreen stability problems, the GCN black screen bug, and the frame time bugs, the fact you bring up DDU is hilarious. AMD drivers are SO good that you have to use a third party to uninstall them correctly, something nvidia fixed over two decades ago.
Any serious hardware tech or reviewer is recommending to use DDU when you upgrade or switch a videocard, even when it is from the same company. It will save you from a lot of potentially and unnecessary headaches or compatibility drivers issues.
 
No. Manufacturers usually mention issues as open when enough people report them. Still, no reviewer was able to duplicate them. Based on that, seems to be more Nvidia smear campaign than real issue.
People reporting issues that AMD can replicate is secretly nvidia smearing them .....
Dafuq did I just read. Seriously, the level of denial..... You know that when amd/nvidia put out an open issue list, many of them will manifest on selected configurations only. Doesn't mean they don't exist if 20 review samples, hand picked by the company, don't get them.
I had issues on 6800 that I and others reported, are common knowledge they exist (workarounds and hacks are available on forums), and AMD never even put them on the open issues list.
 
Last edited:
People reporting issues that AMD can replicate is secretly nvidia smearing them .....
Dafuq did I just read. Seriously, the level of denial..... I had issues on 6800 that I and others reported, are common knowledge they exist, and AMD never even put them on the open issues list.
AMD cannot replicate. Techspot cannot replicate. But it Must be AMD drivers to blame.

Like if you had AMD CPU, it was responsible for any problems. But if you had Intel CPU, problem must have been elsewhere :bomb:

Right now I'm trying to replicate many "6800 problems". No success so far.
 
No. Manufacturers usually mention issues as open when enough people report them. Still, no reviewer was able to duplicate them. Based on that, seems to be more Nvidia smear campaign than real issue.

I can give a counter example from Nvidia garden, which btw, I had issues myself.




Also suggest to read Heverno user post on Nvidia forum to have a better picture of what a deep love is spread among Nvidia and its customers.

Check the date of the tools released by Nvidia.
GTX 1080 was released years before. And I had this issue, random black screens, boot hang out and could not use or enjoy my Acer 27'" G-Sync monitor at all with my GTX 1080ti. Nvidia blamed cable display quality, bought an expensive certified DP cable, the issues still present and quite often.
Nvidia kept this huge issue secret for a long time, did not admitted, recognized it even when there were numerous reports.
All of this so that after many years, nvidia secretly and sneakily released this infamous tools and wanted to pretend that nothing happened and they did not screwed its customers.
 
Last edited:
I can give you a counter example from Nvidia garden, which btw, I had issues myself.
Check the date of the tools released by Nvidia.
GTX 1080 was released years before. And I had this issue, random black screens, boot hang out and could not use or enjoy my Acer 27'" G-Sync monitor at all with my GTX 1080ti. Nvidia blamed cable display quality, bought an expensive certified DP cable, the issues still present and quite often.
Nvidia kept this huge issue secret for a long time, did not admitted, recognized it even when there were numerous reports.
All of this so that after many years, nvidia secretly and sneakily released this infamous tools and wanted to pretend that nothing happened and they did not screwed its customers.
Ws any reviewer able to replicate that problem? If yes, then it's clear case.

When it comes to AMD "black screen" bug, I have not encountered it myself. Nor has any reviewer. There has been many theories, some about poor VRM on cards. Driver problem should be pretty consistent but AMD "black screen" seem to happen only for some and that indicates other than driver problem.
 
Right now I'm trying to replicate many "6800 problems". No success so far.
1. dual monitor vram clock issue has been unsolved for so long they just removed it from the list.same for vram clock if running browser with hw acceleration enabled on single monitor.
2. vulkan+sam vram leak still not fixed, not even acknowledged
3. adrenaline panel deleting all game profiles on crash still not fixed or acknowledged, even though I reported it a dozen times

and if 5700xt issues are made up, how come there are fixes or workarounds (disabling freesync/enhanced sync) that worked for those who reported them ?

When it comes to AMD "black screen" bug, I have not encountered it myself. Nor has any reviewer.
Reviewers are sent pre-tested units.
 
1. dual monitor vram issue has been unsolved for so long they just removed it from the list.
Searched and that seems to be high VRAM frequency when using dual monitor.

Unsurprisingly I cannot replicate that problem myself.
2. vulkan+sam vram leak still not fixed, not even acknowledged
3. adrenaline panel deleting all game profiles on crash still not fixed or acknowledged, even though I reported it a dozen times

and if 5700xt issues are made up, how come there are fixes or workarounds (disabling freesync/enhanced sync) that worked for those who reported them ?


Reviewers are sent pre-tested units.
Will try 2 some time.

3. I have no idea what are game profiles. Perhaps because I don't use them.

Not all problems were solved that easily if reports are to believe.

Reviewers tried on retail cards without success. Not early units. feel free to link case where reviewer was able to replicate those black screen problems.
 
Same for the Nintendo Switch. However, given the system's heavy reliance on two key factors (already relatively short frame time and light asynchronous shader load), neither the Switch nor Steam Deck may have sufficient 'oomph' to really make the most from it.

This is the advantage that Intel's XeSS on Arc cards and Nvidia's DLSS on RTX cards have over using shader-based upscaling/frame generation algorithms -- the matrix/tensor cores can be used concurrently with the normal SIMD units and generally aren't used for anything else (FP16 calculations in the case of Nvidia), so the use of the routines doesn't add to the SIMD load.
It's not like games are programmed to saturate CUs all the time.
 
Reviewers tried on retail cards without success. Not early units. feel free to link case where reviewer was able to replicate those black screen problems.
irrelevant if reviewers got them or not if they get sent tested cards.
how many retail cards did they buy ? and when was it ? anecdotal evidence.
if amd said disabling enhanced sync fixes black screens, they must have identified the problem. so problem still doesn't exist if there's a workaround in official release notes ?
btw didn't Steve say in one of the videos his 5700xt required a custom DP cable to work fine ?

for sam+vulkan in rdr2, go see what your vram usage is at the end of the built-in benchmark.

Searched and that seems to be high VRAM frequency when using dual monitor.

Unsurprisingly I cannot replicate that problem myself.
100% of guys I talked to have it, so do I. Maybe you have 60hz monitors. I have two 165hz ones.
 
Last edited:
Ws any reviewer able to replicate that problem? If yes, then it's clear case.

When it comes to AMD "black screen" bug, I have not encountered it myself. Nor has any reviewer. There has been many theories, some about poor VRM on cards. Driver problem should be pretty consistent but AMD "black screen" seem to happen only for some and that indicates other than driver problem.
I had some with my 5700XT. But noticed that occurred because I had a dual monitor setup in extended configuration with different resolutions and refresh rates.
I posted my observations and conclusions on the forum. My opinion is that if you have a dual monitor setup in extended configuration, it is better for monitors to be the same model.
To have the same resolution and refresh rate for stability and less black screen issues.
Btw I used same monitors in dual extended configuration with Nvidia RTX 2700 Super and experience was worse than on AMD 5700XT, in fact was atrocious with more issues, black screens etc. My next videocard card was AMD 6800XT and since than had few to almost no issues like these.
 
Ws any reviewer able to replicate that problem? If yes, then it's clear case.

When it comes to AMD "black screen" bug, I have not encountered it myself. Nor has any reviewer. There has been many theories, some about poor VRM on cards. Driver problem should be pretty consistent but AMD "black screen" seem to happen only for some and that indicates other than driver problem.
Regarding Nvidia issues, I tested with 2 different videocards, GTX 1080 and 1080Ti, on 2 different computers with 3 different DP cables and every time had the same black screens, hang out and not booting with both GTX 1080 and 1080TI with Acer XB271HU 165HZ.
And of course I spent quite amount of money to experience GTX 1080Ti on a Gsync monitor.
On that occasion I discovered how misleading Nvidia G-Sync was and how bad is Nvidia screwing its customers.
AMD screwed me too, but less than Nvidia and not so bad as Nvidia, so I learned from both to be vigilant, check their claims and not over paying them anymore and more important, to expose them whenever they try to screw uninformed customers.
 
Last edited:
I had some with my 5700XT. But noticed that occurred because I had a dual monitor setup in extended configuration with different resolutions and refresh rates.
I posted my observations and conclusions on the forum. My opinion is that if you have a dual monitor setup in extended configuration, it is better for monitors to be the same model.
To have the same resolution and refresh rate for stability and less black screen issues.
Btw I used same monitors in dual extended configuration with Nvidia RTX 2700 Super and experience was worse than on AMD 5700XT, in fact was atrocious with more issues, black screens etc. My next videocard card was AMD 6800XT and since than had few to almost no issues like these.

I had such issues since the times of RX570. I had dual screen setup for a long time, and with different monitors/TVs/refresh rates/cable types etc. But suddenly in 2023 I have found out about workaround, which is Pixel Format setting in AMD Adrenalin. When it is identical for both screens, everything works just fine. By default one of my screens gets 12 bit color Pixel Format (probably wrongly reported by the chip), and when it is set at Full RGB 4:4:4 for both screens, all problems are magically gone.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back