I was wondering if the initial offering as copper was going to kill light peak by perception.
As has been ably demonstated on these forums amongst others, most people don't have a clue about the technology and will always defer to what they are comfortable with. There is also going to be a perception amongst a percentage of people that Intel=Bad. You could then answer that both HDMI and DisplayPort count Intel amongst their developers. The same group are also going to tout DP's "royalty free" status (as is Thunderbolt) while being blissfully unaware that the DP specification doesn't rule out compensation to contributors or IP holders in future
At the moment Apple is the company offering Thunderbolt, much as they were a prime mover behind DP's adoption. Percentage of Apple users who likely know anything about Light Peak spec ?
My guess is that Light Peak/Thunderbolt will meet resistance in the consumer space so long as it remains expensive (see DisplayPort) and esoteric (Firewire), and enough ignorant people are willing to shell out for every incremental advance in HDMI and DP
I hardly think it's "crippled" as this dude seems to think, but HP turning up their noses isn't going to help adoption.
Probably not, although how the other OEM's respond will dictate how quickly the uptake is I would think. HP are probably anti-Intel-anything I would think after hitching their server business to the Itanium (death)star. With Apple onboard the tech gets a platform in the consumer space, IF a large OEM comes on board- say Dell or instance (who pretty much pioneered consumer 2560x1600 and DP) who might-for example- decide to market a WQUXGA,
4K or HXGA /T-bolt panel, then you'd think that HP would rethink their position. Uptake would be slow in any case-it always is, until it reaches a point where it becomes a standard feature.
I now wonder how long it will be set back by USB 3.0.?
Or USB4.0, or HDMI 1.5, or DisplayPort 1.3 etc, etc.
At a guess I'd say the moment someone produces a saleable 4K+ monitor and then realizes that the DP cable needs to less than 30cm long to run it. Remember that DP is limited to 2m for 2560x1600, and 3m for 1920x1080 (How's that Holodeck lookin'?).
I could well see Intel bringing out a Light Peak internal optical interconnect turning I/O latency into ancient history. No doubt TS's forums in 2015 will be full of "OMG!!! Y dint any1 think of dis sooner LOL"