Thank you for the work and effort, but the review is so upsetting: ANY REVIEW... that reviews GPUs and does not have Call of Duty (thee #1 FPS competitive game) is absolutely worthless review...! Sunday, in chat with ovr thousands of people talking about the new cards RTX coming, so many people wanting to know.. and now Techspot becomes worthless to Gamers and once again catering to single-player games, in which performance doesn't even matter if you are at 58 fps, or 82 fps. Techspot should do an extensive in-game review, to see if frames even matter in single-player games? For the buying public, if you do not have Call of Duty/Battlefield then Techspot gets no shout outs, links, mention, or support. I am sure all the competitive Cyberpunk clans are linking these reviews to their clansmen, chiding them to upgrade so they have enough fluidity to make jumps, or track a foe, etc. What drives GPU sales are games they REQUIRE hardware to compete. IMO, Techspot is doing a disservice to the PC Gamers, being so stuck on Ray Tracing. What is the point in doing a whole section on Ray-Tracing... when the most/best/easiest/monumental way to get performance for you PC system, is to turn off ray tracing..! All of the RTX owners know that nobody actually plays with ray-tracing on. And that turning on RT is something we TRY for a few hours and then go back to performance mode, after the jelly wears off. (So why cater to jelly fish..?) Really saddening that TECHSPOT seems more interested in pseudo-glizzy and is not worried about competitive performance and focused their articles based on "Performance Hits" taken by turning on ray tracing, then actual in-game use. Techspot use to have a large section just for Call of Duty... those charts & graphs were relevant.