TechSpot

Nvidia launches 500-series mobile graphics with rebadged GT 435M

By Matthew
Dec 6, 2010
Post New Reply
  1. Having shipped its first GeForce GTX 500 series desktop graphics card, Nvidia decided it'd be a good time to extend the name to its mobile product line. The company has kicked off its GeForce 500M family with a "new" mid-range chip, the GT 540M. Unfortunately, there's not a whole lot to get excited about as Nvidia continues its ongoing practice of rebadging chips.

    Read the whole story
     
  2. princeton

    princeton TS Addict Posts: 1,716

    Even though ati does it too. Nvidia is the greatest offender. This is just ridiculous. How about you use the Tegra architecture to make mobile gpu's you dumbasses!
     
  3. Regenweald

    Regenweald TS Rookie Posts: 143

    So if you have a gaming laptop with a bios that supports overclocking or just the right software, you too can make your own GT540M out of your GT435M
    AMD's recent 5*** to 6*** mobile update also seems like essentially a name change, although some new 'features' have been added, likely through the driver.....
     
  4. dividebyzero

    dividebyzero trainee n00b Posts: 4,869   +697

    Open invitation to the trolls Matthew ?

    Just for those who are getting ready to arm themselves with indignation and Red Bull...
    Both AMD and nvidia have a tengancy to view the mobile GPU market as an afterthought, thus we get to the stage where the desktop parts are usually one generation (and one series number) greater than their mobile counterparts.
    An example of how the mobile parts morph depending upon the whims of PR...
    Mobility Radeon HD 4570 = Mobility Radeon HD 5145 (January 2010) = Mobility Radeon HD 540V (June 2010)
    Mobility Radeon HD 4650 = Mobility Radeon HD 5165 (January 2010) = Mobility Radeon HD 560V (June 2010)

    [source #1] [source #2]

    Oh, and before the green half of the fanboy base pipes up...

    GTS 260M = GTS 360M (January 2010).....as an example.

    So, between rebrands and allocating higher performing desktop names for much lower performing mobile parts (Mobility HD 5870, GTX 480M etc.), I don't think you'll find to much truth in advertising whichever manufacturer is pushing out the parts.
     
  5. red1776

    red1776 Omnipotent Ruler of the Universe Posts: 5,897   +88

    :haha: I have to turn the damn web-cam off! and its AMP chef.
    I will try to find the article, but I read a few days back the some 5000 series parts were showing up in the mobile sector as 7xxx parts...that's a re-re-brand yes?
     
  6. dividebyzero

    dividebyzero trainee n00b Posts: 4,869   +697

    Surely not. The article must have been generated by a gossip site. I can't believe that AMD (or nvidia for that matter) would initiate a new series number with a mobile part. If it were a 28nm part or some weird naming convention for an APU then I guess it's possible, but not for a flat-out rebrand.
     
  7. red1776

    red1776 Omnipotent Ruler of the Universe Posts: 5,897   +88

    Either the APU, or they need a proofreader on staff. who knows, maybe the 28nm parts are not going to be 7000.
    And I don't read gossip sites, now Charlie said that...:)
     
  8. Matthew

    Matthew TechSpot Staff Topic Starter Posts: 6,066   +84 Staff Member

  9. Regenweald

    Regenweald TS Rookie Posts: 143

  10. dividebyzero

    dividebyzero trainee n00b Posts: 4,869   +697

    I think the Fusion APU's are designated HD 61xx-64xx at this stage.
    And yeah, Charlie does come out with some s**t. -OT here (maybe I should stir up the 1100t review comments!)- I got emailed this today. For all the quad and hex core people...
    http://www.semiaccurate.com/forums/showpost.php?p=86715&postcount=228
    The pal who emailed me and was going to join up and point out that a lot of games are now using ~100% CPU usage across four cores ( ~66% across six cores if Win7 detects that many) such as here for BFBC2 etc etc. I told him not to bother...a classic case of "There's none so blind as those who will not see" and Charlie's usual "Defend Intel at all costs/Sandy Bridge is more than enough/Who needs 8-core Bulldozer" beatdown of all who oppose.

    I was actually think of nvidia trolls in the first instance, the "What about the X1950XT, what about the, what about the..." crowd. While I agree that nvidia sets the table for criticism, I think it's also quite apparent that a fair percentage of posters add comments based solely on the content of a single article...asking some of them to place what's written into context regarding a wider view of the industry is setting the bar just a tad to high IMO.
     
  11. madboyv1

    madboyv1 TechSpot Paladin Posts: 956   +49

    In otherwords, people don't do research and are incapable of writing in context (nothing new to see here folks =p ). I completely agree than many users in general just repeat what one person/article says, usually from people/sites that are very critical of the smallest things, and especially when they are biased from one brand to another.
     
     
  12. Technically it is a different gpu if they made any of the modifications, made to the gtx 580 from the 480.These serious modifications reduce heat and power usage,which was the 400 series main problems.So to call it a rebadging is a incorrect.
     


Add New Comment

TechSpot Members
Login or sign up for free,
it takes about 30 seconds.
You may also...
Get complete access to the TechSpot community. Join thousands of technology enthusiasts that contribute and share knowledge in our forum. Get a private inbox, upload your own photo gallery and more.