Just like how Nvidia marketed Ada at launch, they will tell you it is 3x faster when you enable DLSS 3.0 Frame generation. So yeah, its already there, but with software trickery. Jokes aside, I am skeptical we will see a big jump in Blackwell's performance, and I am pretty sure that Nvidia will gimp the card somehow by limiting the VRAM to likely 12GB like now. So even if it can run faster, you are still going to be VRAM bound.
99% of PC gamers use 1440p or less and don't need more VRAM and most 4K/UHD+ gamers want 4090 because it simply beats everything else with a big margin for this.
4060 Ti 8GB and 16GB performed identical.
4070 Ti 12GB and SUPER with 16GB performed the same, outside of a few edge cases where RT was enabled in native 4K/UHD which is not even possible for 4090 to do. Upscaling is needed. Alan Wake 2 is made for upscaling in mind and you should not be playing this on "native" res.
You should not believe AMDs VRAM marketing. In reality VRAM is not a problem OUTSIDE of rushed console ports (which strangely enough was sponsored by AMD).
Techpowerups conclusion of 4070 Ti SUPER - "16 GB VRAM rarely makes a difference"
Their 4060 Ti 8GB vs 16GB test - "No significant performance gains from 16 GB VRAM"
But sure keep believing VRAM matters alot. In reality most games will be forced to lower settings because of weak GPUs (or enable upscaling). 6700XT was meant to age well because of 12GB VRAM but in reality it did not, because GPU was too weak to utilize the VRAM in the first place. GPU can simply not run high settings anyway in new and demanding games.
Forcing GPUs to max VRAM on settings that NO-ONE expected them to run in the first place makes no sense.
Mention ONE AMD GPU that can max out all games at 4K/UHD native with RT enabled? Does VRAM save you in this case? Nope, because their GPUs are too weak.
And this is why AMD talks about VRAM in the first place. They sadly have nothing else to talk about. They are not fooling many tho.
I had 6800XT. Now I have 4090. Had both since release really. Not going back to AMD anytime soon unless they improve their feature-set massively.
DLSS, DLAA, DLDSR, Reflex, Nvidia Filters and Freestyle, ShadowPlay, every single feature is just MUCH better on the Nvidia side. This is what you pay for.
If AMD was better, they would atleast be priced on par or even higher. However AMD prices them below Nvidia every single time.
AMD is a CPU company first and foremost. No-one expected them to beat Nvidia in the GPU market and they don't. Nvidia pretty much dominate in all GPU markets. Gaming, AI and Enterprise. This is just reality.