Hi y'all,
since the advent of FF and TB 1.0 I made several friends of mine to successfully switch from their MS counterparts. However, one of them has complained about FF beeing extremely slow when browsing the web.
TB works like a charme and MSIE is "lightning fast" compared to what FF has to offer.
For that reason I don't think that the TCP/IP settings are messed up in general, but the prob's purely related to FF.
Because I'm the "PC guy" around, she asked (well, actually insisted <g>) for help, since it was my glory idea to make her use FF for "safety, useability and speed reasons" ... She saw the useability and safety benefits, but no speed. And I must agree: FF is painfully slow on this machine.
This has been true with both XP Home SP1 and also after updating to SP2 just recently.
Especially eBay and Amazon are a no-go, as well as other sites using resources from several sub-domains (like images or scripts) are a real PITA to browse with FF.
I checked all available IP and network settings, DNS cache and alike, and also "hacked" some settings via about:config in FF to make it use more connections and the "nglayout.initialpaint.delay" with no success (taken from some Mozdev-Forum IIRC).
Well, to be honest: except for the nglayout delay set to zero, the proposed networking/http settings had no great impact on my machine either, but I thought to give 'em a try. From what I see in the rest of about:config / networking.*, all values are the defaults -- like on my machine which runs fine.
There aren't any extensions installed either that could probably interfere with these settings.
My friend's computer uses an ISDN dial-up connection which is quiet fine in "speed" for any other application using TCP/IP (MSIE, TB, BitDefender etc. pp)
There's no difference if I disable BitDefender (incl. background services) so I don't think that its firewall or AV engine are causing this.
I mean the pages show up, but it takes over a minute for them to complete, compared to several seconds only in MSIE.
Also it doesn't matter if the dial-up is initiated by FF/MSIE or manually. In any situation MSIE beats FF in speed, which makes it hart for me to argue for FF.
I did or course a clean install of FF (1.0.1 at that time) after dumping the profile/app folder - no success.
Any ideas anyone?
Thanx.
Have fun,
CirTap
since the advent of FF and TB 1.0 I made several friends of mine to successfully switch from their MS counterparts. However, one of them has complained about FF beeing extremely slow when browsing the web.
TB works like a charme and MSIE is "lightning fast" compared to what FF has to offer.
For that reason I don't think that the TCP/IP settings are messed up in general, but the prob's purely related to FF.
Because I'm the "PC guy" around, she asked (well, actually insisted <g>) for help, since it was my glory idea to make her use FF for "safety, useability and speed reasons" ... She saw the useability and safety benefits, but no speed. And I must agree: FF is painfully slow on this machine.
This has been true with both XP Home SP1 and also after updating to SP2 just recently.
Especially eBay and Amazon are a no-go, as well as other sites using resources from several sub-domains (like images or scripts) are a real PITA to browse with FF.
I checked all available IP and network settings, DNS cache and alike, and also "hacked" some settings via about:config in FF to make it use more connections and the "nglayout.initialpaint.delay" with no success (taken from some Mozdev-Forum IIRC).
Well, to be honest: except for the nglayout delay set to zero, the proposed networking/http settings had no great impact on my machine either, but I thought to give 'em a try. From what I see in the rest of about:config / networking.*, all values are the defaults -- like on my machine which runs fine.
There aren't any extensions installed either that could probably interfere with these settings.
My friend's computer uses an ISDN dial-up connection which is quiet fine in "speed" for any other application using TCP/IP (MSIE, TB, BitDefender etc. pp)
There's no difference if I disable BitDefender (incl. background services) so I don't think that its firewall or AV engine are causing this.
I mean the pages show up, but it takes over a minute for them to complete, compared to several seconds only in MSIE.
Also it doesn't matter if the dial-up is initiated by FF/MSIE or manually. In any situation MSIE beats FF in speed, which makes it hart for me to argue for FF.
I did or course a clean install of FF (1.0.1 at that time) after dumping the profile/app folder - no success.
Any ideas anyone?
Thanx.
Have fun,
CirTap