Windows 7 launch may not incite PC sales

By Justin
Sep 24, 2009
Topic Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Generally speaking, PC sales surge when Microsoft launches a new version of Windows. Steeper system requirements among other motives exist for people to purchase a new machine along with a fresh Windows build. Recognizing this, suppliers often beef up their stock shortly before launch dates. That was true for Windows Vista and Windows XP, but may not be so for Windows 7.

    Read the whole story
  2. raybay

    raybay TechSpot Evangelist Posts: 10,716   +6

    It will by the week after Christmas... but there will no big surges until the economy improves.
    For most, the investment also includes a computer or motherboard or power supply and money is tight.
  3. Jimmy5

    Jimmy5 Newcomer, in training

    If I buy a new computer, I'll be sticking xp on it but that won't be for a while.
  4. 9Nails

    9Nails TechSpot Paladin Posts: 961   +84

    Buying an OS isn't driven by new computers, it's driven by software titles. And if the software that you want run on Windows XP or Mac OX, then that's what you buy. If there isn't some killer app that only runs on or comes with Seven, then what's the point to upgrading? Most people who use safe Internet practices are happy with XP's security, stability, and software support.
  5. Rick

    Rick TechSpot Staff Posts: 6,304   +52 Staff Member

    But sales through OEM partners that preload systems with Windows 7 count just as much.

    In fact, historically, I'd wager that most Windows sales are from licensed pre-installs and not from retail copies.
  6. raybay

    raybay TechSpot Evangelist Posts: 10,716   +6

    Already widely known to be true.
    But then machine-linked Windows is not the same as the full version.
    It is very difficult, and expensive, to buy the full version anywhere.
    Dell and HP together sell more Windows XP than all others combined. I expect that will continue.
  7. Vrmithrax

    Vrmithrax TechSpot Paladin Posts: 1,285   +232

    Of course, one of the primary factors was sort of missed in this article, which is very telling and a huge factor in the Windows 7 push - for the first time in what seems like eons, a new OS is being released that actually runs better on light hardware than its predecessor. You have to keep in mind that Vista is a horrid, unoptimized pig when it comes to system resources. Rather than do a good job of making it efficient and tight, it was thrown together and just thrown (relatively) huge system resources to make it work. Microsoft has done an admirable job with optimizing Windows 7 (and I don't give kudos to MS often, if EVER, so keep that in mind). In nearly every test I've seen (and done), Win7 works faster on the same hardware as Vista. So, there will be no push to get new computers, like there was with Vista, because Win7 will work decently with most of the hardware already out there.
  8. spikester48661

    spikester48661 TechSpot Enthusiast Posts: 103

    I ran windows7 and i,m not going to pay M$ 200.00 for it.when you can transform XP and vista in to windows 7. And get all the looks and software for free. So why buy a new PC for a new OS ?????
  9. moeschen

    moeschen Newcomer, in training

    why does a simple question require ?????????????????
    As an odler peson I remember the days when just one ? would work.
  10. @spikester48661, "So why buy a new PC for a new OS ?????"

    It is the cheapest and most efficient way to get a legal version of an OS. Windows 7, in my experience, is pretty tight. XP is outdated, only able to run DX9, and Vista is slower. I am currently triple booting Windows XP, 7, and Mac OSX. Even if you "transform" XP and Vista into WIin7, you will not have Win7. You will have a slower version of XP or Vista. So far, Win7 has been incredibly stable and very responsive.

    @moeschen "why does a simple question require ?????????????????"

    Thank you, I too remember those days.

    @Vrmithrax

    Windows 7 actually has the same system requirements as Vista does, yet, as you stated, runs smoother on the same hardware. Benchmark results are higher across the board. I can't wait till I find compatible software for everything. So far on build 7600 all my devices work, but I can't get certain programs to function correctly. MS also has the XP sim, but I haven't given that a shot yet.
  11. "Already widely known to be true.
    But then machine-linked Windows is not the same as the full version.
    It is very difficult, and expensive, to buy the full version anywhere.
    Dell and HP together sell more Windows XP than all others combined. I expect that will continue."


    eh? You haven't got a clue what you're talking about. OEM copies differ very slightly, it all depends what additional software / branding an OEM distributor wishes to add to the installation. The main difference is that you require the OEM disk to use with your OEM key, you can't use a retail disk.

    For example, Dell's copies have a Dell Support Center and a few additional apps, certainly no less than the full product.

    I know this to be fact as I work as a Microsoft partner and get all of the software for free. I've been using Windows 7 for months now and it beats the shite out of anything Microsoft have released so far. This article is just pap. Most companies are already pushing free upgrades to Windows 7 when it is released if you purchase Vista now.
     
Topic Status:
Not open for further replies.


Add New Comment

TechSpot Members
Login or sign up for free,
it takes about 30 seconds.
You may also...


Get complete access to the TechSpot community. Join thousands of technology enthusiasts that contribute and share knowledge in our forum. Get a private inbox, upload your own photo gallery and more.