also @ TechSpot: Metro: Last Light Performance, Benchmarked

Windows Seven

Discussion in 'Windows OS' started by Ultiweap, Aug 19, 2008.

?

Windows Seven better or worst

Windows Seven better than Vista 6 vote(s) 75.0%
Windows Seven worst than Vista 2 vote(s) 25.0%
  1. InsaneVr6 Newcomer, in training Posts: 260

    Yup, i agree. I bought my first vista pc last october and vista had already been out for a year i believe, so i did not buy it right away because i couldn't. However i used vista before on my XP based laptop and it ran ok but no where near as great as my desktop runs it. And your right you never know what Microsoft can change by 2010. Might not be anything like Vista by then...never know for sure until its commerically available.
  2. Bobbye Helper on the Fringe Posts: 16,406   +16

    Hey, I'll tell you what- if Microsoft can't do any better with $300 million to advertise than the trash that's coming out now, they won't get an new users!
  3. captaincranky TechSpot Addict Posts: 8,782   +278

    All things considered XP still seems like the better OS, at least to me.
    I'm thinking that even after M$ stops supporting it, security "patches" will probably be available in improved browsers and security software. At least I hope so.

    As long as M$ simply doesn't shut it off, I'm gonna stand pat, as they say in Blackjack.

    Meh, Windows 7, more hardware intensive than even Vista, and still more DRM.

    I'd answer the poll but IMHO, there aren't enough choices.
  4. SNGX1275 TS Special Forces Posts: 11,893   +117

    I'm still running Windows 2000 on a low power PC I built as a server (Via C7). It works fine. The only thing I do on my Vista machine that I can't do on it is game, and thats because I intentionally used extremely low power hardware.

    People say Vista is slower than XP, and all the features Vista gives you over XP can be done in XP with software addons. That is probably true. Its also true of Windows 2000, everything you can do in XP can be done on 2000 with addons. AND 2000 with SP4 is probably faster than XP. So maybe you guys should run 2000.
  5. captaincranky TechSpot Addict Posts: 8,782   +278

    I think even Newegg is out of stock on Windows 2000.

    Edit; people are apparently still selling it, but they still think a lot of it.
  6. Ultiweap TechSpot Enthusiast Posts: 742

    Yeah Windows 2000 isn't a bad one but for me the best OS Microsoft had released is Windows 98 SE the best one, the less buggy and the more rapid one. And the proof New OS are still having its theme in it. But the only problem now is that Microsoft stop supporting it.
     
  7. kimsland Ex-TechSpotter Posts: 18,353

    Actually just a spin off question about older OS's

    If I install Windows 98SE on an old computer, without a COA sticker, am I breaking MS EULA ? (I'm thinking no, because it's now over 10years old) But I can't find the answer to this question anywhere, and I don't believe MS support will understand me, if I asked them! (except by getting a hundred questions thrown back to me)

    I mean I couldn't buy a key if I wanted too (haven't actually looked, but this is not relevant to my question)
    Basically MS activation didn't exist in the old Win98 days.
  8. Ultiweap TechSpot Enthusiast Posts: 742

    Yeah for the activation I agree with you but talking about performance and bugs Win98 SE is one of the best one Microsoft released.
  9. InsaneVr6 Newcomer, in training Posts: 260

    I agree in Windows98se is a great OS. I think that NT, 2000, etc were not really that impressive. I say 98SE, XP, and Vista (thought not at first) are the best Microsoft have come out with in my opinion. Hopefully Windows 7 will follow suit.
  10. captaincranky TechSpot Addict Posts: 8,782   +278

    M$ doesn't impress me as a company that lets much of anything slide, but hey, they might surprise us. As you well know, activation began with XP because of piracy with the older systems. If I had to guess, I'm thinking that M$ is NOT going to NOT require activation of XP after suport ends. (ed note; double negative on purpose). Who the hell knows, they might try to take the OSes back.

    I would think calling and announcing your intention to install an unregistered OS, would unnecessarily telegraph your intentions. This perhaps because I do not like to talk to a******* via long distance either.

    It's fine for us to wax nostalgic for the older OSes, but realistically, I would think that their use would be only suitable for a free standing computer, not connected to the internet. This obviously due to security issues, and questions as to whether any effective modern security software could be made to run natively in anything much before XP.
  11. EXCellR8 The Conservative Posts: 2,273

    I think Windows 7 will be better in terms of user-friendliness and compatibility but unfortunately, I think it will be another "heavy Vista-like" operating system that will require a lot of power to run. I'm glad it's coming out soonish though because now I have another good reason to stick with XP and not make the move to Vista.
  12. kimsland Ex-TechSpotter Posts: 18,353

    I found a thread here at Microsoft, stating how to bypass Windows 98 key.
    One post even stated try this key, and provided the key itself.
    Obviously MS are not concerned about such posts (re:98) Therefore my question has indirectly been answered. MS do not care, and support has ended long ago.
  13. captaincranky TechSpot Addict Posts: 8,782   +278

    I never thought I'd hear myself say this but, "God bless Microsoft". Can I get an "amen"?
  14. InsaneVr6 Newcomer, in training Posts: 260

    amen
  15. Ultiweap TechSpot Enthusiast Posts: 742

    Not bad at all... This will help some people go back to Win98SE but don't find it really useful to go back.