Most Popular
| Top Stories | Commented | Featured |
Weekend Open Forum: Have you upgraded to Windows 7 yet? What is there to like/not? featured
Tech Tip of The Week: Turn Off your Display Using a Windows Shortcut and More featured
Netflix PS3 streaming arrives tomorrow
Dell's ultra-thin Adamo XPS to ship soon for $1,799
Windows 7 crushed Vista in early launch sales
Nvidia Tegra 2 to double performance, arrive next year?
TS Community
| User Gallery | Recent Discussion |
Simple by ColdFusion1990 | JJR's Wallpaper by JJR |
3mb/s by Fiziks | Coconut Trees by bnreddy |
Information Technology
AMD unveils 2 year roadmap and details next-gen CPUs
Is AMD's answer to Core and Core 2 finally here? Today, during the “Financial Analyst Day Presentation”, AMD unloaded a veritable horde of information on the community, showing details about many up and coming projects. The most exciting of which is an overhaul in the way AMD is looking at CPU design, which is dramatically different from the direction Intel is heading. While Intel is focusing on adding more cores to existing dies, creating a more powerful parallel processor, AMD is looking at taking multiple cores, but also relying on dedicated “xPU”'s of various types. By putting these “Accelerated Processing Units”, which could be anything from video accelerators to encryption accelerators, onto a single die, they are looking to avoid a core-war and instead focus on specialization:
Fusion, AMD's integrated CPU and graphics processor, is AMD's first step in that direction. However, the company eventually intends add more specialized cores that can handle tasks other than general-purpose computing and graphics. AMD didn't give any specific examples, but one could easily imagine future Fusion-like chips with cores for physics processing, audio/video encoding, and heck, maybe even AI acceleration.
While things like physics acceleration are only beginning to see adoption, the idea of a dedicated CPU for a particular task is nothing new. In the past, companies have attempted to put nearly all ICs into a single die, creating so called “Systems on a Chip”. AMD's direction is similar, though they appear to have much more focus, targeting areas that are most important to today's desktop and workstation users, by tailoring specific processors to specific markets. A gaming processor, an office processor, a CAD processor... it could be done.
AMD also announced many other plans for the near future, such as the development of HT 3.0, the introduction of quad core processors, DirectX 10 native integrated graphics cores, PCI Ex 2.0 and much more.
They are expecting true quad-core CPUs to be available mid 2007. Other improvements were also cited, such as a redesigned mobile core that will reduce power consumption and specifically intended to be paired with systems that have hybrid hard drives. The article is definitely worth reading, and many of the things AMD has put on their roadmap are looking really good.
Fusion, AMD's integrated CPU and graphics processor, is AMD's first step in that direction. However, the company eventually intends add more specialized cores that can handle tasks other than general-purpose computing and graphics. AMD didn't give any specific examples, but one could easily imagine future Fusion-like chips with cores for physics processing, audio/video encoding, and heck, maybe even AI acceleration.
While things like physics acceleration are only beginning to see adoption, the idea of a dedicated CPU for a particular task is nothing new. In the past, companies have attempted to put nearly all ICs into a single die, creating so called “Systems on a Chip”. AMD's direction is similar, though they appear to have much more focus, targeting areas that are most important to today's desktop and workstation users, by tailoring specific processors to specific markets. A gaming processor, an office processor, a CAD processor... it could be done.
AMD also announced many other plans for the near future, such as the development of HT 3.0, the introduction of quad core processors, DirectX 10 native integrated graphics cores, PCI Ex 2.0 and much more.
They are expecting true quad-core CPUs to be available mid 2007. Other improvements were also cited, such as a redesigned mobile core that will reduce power consumption and specifically intended to be paired with systems that have hybrid hard drives. The article is definitely worth reading, and many of the things AMD has put on their roadmap are looking really good.
Related Stories
User Comments (6)
Post a comment| TimeParadoX on December 15, 2006 11:45 PM | Im looking forward to AMD's new Processors, I always liked AMD so if they advance as much as they said then it will beat Intel in the Processor war
|
| d310n9 on December 16, 2006 9:09 AM | i hope htey can come up with a "quiet" high ("game") cpu for laptops...all amd'S i've seen so far for laptops are basically just the standard ones jammed into a bad ass big laptop with a "ueber" loud cooling system...thats why i've been sticking with intels for now...although they start to annoy me T_T
|
| spydercanopus on December 16, 2006 10:04 AM | I want a 100% integrated circut computer. AKA solid state PC. Come on AMD! You can do it! With ATI at your disposal you should be able to conqure intel!
|
| buttus on December 16, 2006 12:48 PM | I like this concept VERY much. I like the fact that AMD wants to not only differentiate itself from Intel (and not fight a loosing battle ie the Megahertz war on Intels ground), but AMD truely wants to innovate. I think we all know now that more power isn't always better. Todays desktops have WAY too much power that isn't even close to being utilized. Cores that run at 5% capacity and so on. I think it is a basic philosophy. Work smarter...not harder. Having these specialized cores is similar to Dells advertising schemes where you build a custom PC to suit your specific needs. Well, that specialization will now start AT the core and work it's way out instead of say starting with the mainboard.
|
| t-tek on December 18, 2006 9:52 AM | amd is the shit if your rich but in my case intel is fucking awsome
|
| deronjthomas on December 18, 2006 2:06 PM | If you are a hard core gamer would you get the Gaming CPU or the C.A.D. CPU? Since C.A.D. and gaming use much of the same math. Just like some gamers would use a Xeon Processor for gaming.
|
TechSpot RSS



