FCC approves giant mirror satellite designed to beam sunlight to Earth after dark

midian182

Posts: 11,843   +179
Staff member
WTF?! Remember the California startup that was developing a constellation of satellites with giant Mylar mirrors to beam sunlight back to Earth after dark? Despite the plan generating a slew of controversy, those satellites have passed another hurdle toward becoming a reality after the FCC approved them.

Back in July 2025, Reflect Orbital submitted an application to launch Eärendil-1, a demonstration satellite designed to test whether sunlight can be redirected from orbit onto specific locations on Earth. The FCC has now granted the satellite permission to operate its radio equipment.

The regulator also rejected calls to block the project over its enormous reflective surface, arguing that the mirror itself falls outside the FCC's authority because the agency primarily regulates communications spectrum.

Eärendil-1 is expected to operate in a near-polar orbit roughly 625 kilometers (388 miles) above Earth. Once deployed, it will unfold an 18 x 18-meter (59 x 59 feet) aluminized Mylar reflector, giving it a surface area of 324 square meters (1,062 feet).

Reflect Orbital says the satellite will direct a moving beam of sunlight onto areas approximately five kilometers (3.1 miles) wide. The demonstration is designed to test the company's ability to deploy, control, and precisely aim the mirror from orbit.

The idea isn't some Simpsons-like plan to keep us awake all the time. The startup ultimately wants to sell "sunlight on demand" to solar farms, allowing them to continue generating electricity after sunset. However, it has also floated possible some more unconventional uses, including emergency response, construction, agriculture, military operations, and large outdoor events.

Beyond the Eärendil-1 prototype, Reflect Orbital has discussed deploying thousands of mirrors by the end of the decade and as many as 50,000 by 2035.

Unsurprisingly, astronomers are not thrilled by the prospect of tens of thousands of giant reflective objects crossing the night sky. The European Southern Observatory recently warned that Reflect Orbital's satellites could become the brightest artificial objects ever placed in orbit.

Researchers say a full constellation could severely interfere with ground-based telescopes, create bright trails across astronomical images, increase overall sky glow, and make observations of faint celestial objects far more difficult.

Other critics have raised concerns about the effects on nocturnal wildlife, human sleep patterns, aviation, and the issue of a private company deciding where and when parts of the planet should be illuminated.

Another concern is the potential to worsen Earth's growing orbital debris problem. Reflect Orbital must comply with strict disposal requirements by deorbiting each satellite within 25 years of the end of its mission, or earlier.

The company insists the beams will be tightly controlled and directed only toward approved locations. It has also said that the mirrors can be angled away from Earth when not in use and that it intends to coordinate with astronomers to limit disruption.

The FCC approval does not authorize Reflect Orbital's planned full constellation, and the company still needs to successfully build, launch, deploy, and control Eärendil-1. SpaceX was selected to carry the startup's first two demonstration satellites aboard Falcon 9 rockets.

Russia attempted a similar concept in the 1990s with its Znamya experiments. The first test briefly produced a moving patch of light across Europe, while a second mission failed after the reflector became tangled during deployment.

Permalink to story:

 
I bet this cost a pretty penny to push through.
Now do the sunshine side in geosynchronous orbit to ransom daylight to poorer parts of the world using opaque discs that close inward from an aperture ring.
 
I bet this cost a pretty penny to push through.
Now do the sunshine side in geosynchronous orbit to ransom daylight to poorer parts of the world using opaque discs that close inward from an aperture ring.

this is it: we don't really need the extra heat/light. We need something to protect certain biomes from excessive sunlight (like the poles) and the deserts.
 
This looks like a dystopian nightmare, .

All you need to know is in the name of the company. Any company or product named after or referencing Tolkien characters or language should be considered suspect.

Edit: Just looked at their website: Their marketing materials suggest they want 50k satellites in orbit by 2035.
 
Last edited:
This looks like a dystopian nightmare, there are so many ways this can be abused and so I hope it crashes and burns.
Agree, especially the "military operations" part. Like tighten and redirect the beam and... Target Destroyed. Just like that movie where they redirected a space laser to fill a house with popcorn.

Anyone ever hear of hackers and what they can do?
 
Futurama has already shown us the consequences of a mirror in space.....
You probably shouldn't get your science education from kid's cartoons.

this is it: we don't really need the extra heat/light.
If you troubled to do the math, you'd see that this 18m x 18m mirror will add about 320kW to the earth's heat budget -- or about the same as ONE 420 hp automobile.

Just like that movie where they redirected a space laser to fill a house with popcorn.

Anyone ever hear of hackers and what they can do?
Not even the most skilled hacker can convert unfocused ambient light into a coherent space laser. The mirrors would be constructed so that the maximum flux possible on any spot of the earth's surface is no more than what's received at noon.

there are so many ways this can be abused and so I hope it crashes and burns.
There are far less ways this can be abused than can be the Internet, computers and personal automobiles, and that whole "electricity" invention. Let's hope they crash and burn too, eh?
 
In the 1970s, the USSR began work on a similar mirror to orbit over Moscow: not for solar power, but simply to light the city at night. The flux would have been far weaker than normal sunlight -- equivalent to that of bright moonlight -- but the project was ultimately abandoned over the problems of light pressure a stable orbit. Still, for urban lighting, this is far more efficient than burning gigawatts of natural gas for heat, merely to convert that into electricity and pipe it into city streetlights.
 
I think this is a cool idea, but if they shine one of those lights on my house at night I would want them to send me some money so I can buy blackout curtains because I have a hard time sleeping if my room is super bright
 
Seems to me, that someone had proposed just the opposite a few years ago. Believing the Earth was too hot; so throw some shade on certain areas.

Now we're talking! Far more useful to shade areas than to light them. I miles big shadow across most areas would significantly drop the temperature saving energy and people.
 
In the 1970s, the USSR began work on a similar mirror to orbit over Moscow: not for solar power, but simply to light the city at night. The flux would have been far weaker than normal sunlight -- equivalent to that of bright moonlight -- but the project was ultimately abandoned over the problems of light pressure a stable orbit. Still, for urban lighting, this is far more efficient than burning gigawatts of natural gas for heat, merely to convert that into electricity and pipe it into city streetlights.
More efficient than burning natural gas for electricity, sure. Definitely not more efficient than just using batteries to provide electricity for urban lighting at night.

Plus a single rainstorm and now you have zero light in the city.
 
There seems to be no end to how the US is willing to destroy the World.

Some examples.
- Pretending climate change is a hoax, rolling back all sort of limits on pollution and using money to stop renewable energy projects.
- Removing protection of areas with fragile species.
- Allowing companies to put thousands of satellites into space. Including this latest insanity.
- Drill baby, drill...
- Starting wars
 
More efficient than burning natural gas for electricity, sure. Definitely not more efficient than just using batteries to provide electricity for urban lighting at night.
Quite wrong. How do you think batteries are charged? Even if one assumes solar cells, you're losing ~70% at the cells themselves, plus another 10% or so from battery charge/discharge and transmission losses.

Plus a single rainstorm and now you have zero light in the city.
This is ambient street lighting, not internal light. How effective do you think street lamps are (and how necessary) during a thunderstorm powerful enough to turn daylight into dark?
 
Last edited:
There seems to be no end to how the US is willing to destroy the World.
Your attempts to not create false blame, but focus it on one nation reveals what complete tripe the rest of your post is.
- Pretending climate change is a hoax, rolling back all sort of limits on pollution
The US has some of the strictest limits on pollution in the world, and a cleaner environment than most nation. But CO2 is not "pollution": it's airborne fertilizer, necessary for all life on earth.

and using money to stop renewable energy projects.
If "renewable" energy made sense, it wouldn't need trillions in government subsidies to keep it in operation.

- Removing protection of areas with fragile species.
I realize how fond you are of the kangaroo rat and the spotted wood louse, but environmentalist have played the fake species game long enough. The majority of protected "species" are able to freely interbreed with other populations, and are no more separate 'species' than red-heads are from the rest of the human population.

- Allowing companies to put thousands of satellites into space
Next, you'll be wanting to ban the Internet, computers, automobiles, and electricity itself.

Oh wait-- you're already trying to.

- Starting wars
The two largest wars of the last century and the largest war of this century were all started by European nations. If only those clowns would settle down and rejoin civilized society, eh?
 
The US has some of the strictest limits on pollution in the world, and a cleaner environment than most nation. But CO2 is not "pollution": it's airborne fertilizer, necessary for all life on earth.
Say what! How about you back that up with some facts.

Americans drives everywhere and often in trucks, the trucks alone account for a lot of pollution and they are not under strict limits.
Then there is housing, where the US building codes are decades behind countries that care for the environment. This means housing that takes more energy to heat and cool, that are sub-par when it comes to living. However it is almost a positive they aren't build to last, but houses build to last have a much smaller impact on the environment.
Even it comes to food things are bad, not only is there allowed so much bad stuff in food it is a big health issue the way food is produced is wasteful as well. It is like instead of being smart the way is always brute force, that isn't the natural way to grow food and it isn't sustainable.

Finally about the CO2, you need to look up what levels are good and what it does when the levels are to high. It is like we all need water, but to much and you drown.
 
Americans drives everywhere and often in trucks, the trucks alone account for a lot of pollution
US cars and trucks have strict limits on both VOCs and particulates, more than 100X stricter than most Asian, African, and Eastern European nations. Try again.

Then there is housing, where the US building codes are decades behind countries that care for the environment.
This literally made me laugh aloud. Do you even know what a building code is?

Finally about the CO2, you need to look up what levels are good
Current CO2 levels are some 400ppm ... during the early Carboniferous Period, they were at 8,000 ppm (20X higher than today), the earth was in one of the richest and most periods of biodiversity in history. And, had the Industrial Revolution not occurred, CO2 would have eventually descended to just 200ppm, when photosynthesis ceases and all life on earth ends.
 
The FCC’s position is essentially that it regulates the satellite’s radio, not the enormous space mirror attached to it. Bureaucratically correct, cosmically hilarious.
 
The FCC’s position is essentially that it regulates the satellite’s radio, not the enormous space mirror attached to it. Bureaucratically correct, cosmically hilarious.
I find it slightly disturbing that you feel a government body refusing to exceed its congressionally-mandated authority to be "comic".

"..The FCC regulates interstate and international communications by radio, television, wire, satellite and cable...."

Night lights -- whether in space or elsewhere -- don't fall into that category, which is why the FCC approval applies only to the radio communications equipment on this satellite.
 
Last edited:
There seems to be no end to how the US is willing to destroy the World.

Some examples.
- Pretending climate change is a hoax, rolling back all sort of limits on pollution and using money to stop renewable energy projects.
- Removing protection of areas with fragile species.
- Allowing companies to put thousands of satellites into space. Including this latest insanity.
- Drill baby, drill...
- Starting wars
If it weren't for the USA, you all would be speaking German across Europe! You're phrasing is incorrect, I'll fix it for you: "If it weren't for the US, the world would be destroyed".

Also, you'd have NO PHONE, NO CELL PHONE, NO INTERNET, NO TV......America invented all these things and most of the things you use on a daily basis! NEVER FORGET AND THANK US REGULARLY!
 
Back