Most Popular
| Top Stories | Commented | Featured |
ATI Radeon HD 5570 Review featured
AMD's six-core Thuban to have feature like Turbo Boost?
Google to launch Twitter-like service for Gmail
Intel unveils Itanium 9300 series enterprise processors
Netflix to roll out 1080p streaming later this year
China closes major hacker ring, arrests three members
Sharp and Samsung end LCD patent suits with cross-licensing agreement
TechSpot RSSIndustry News
Belgian court fines Google for archiving articles
Google runs fairly uninhibited for the most part, largely because of the aura of usefulness they seem to have, but occasionally they still run afoul of other companies. Not long ago, a Belgium based newspaper sued the giant, due to its caching of news articles and images that you could retrieve from search. While I find such features infinitely useful, the Belgium courts agreed that Google would have to proactively contact copyright owners first before doing such. They've been ordered to pay a fine and remove what they already have up:
But in the future, it said it would be up to copyright owners to get in touch with Google by e-mail to complain if the site was posting content that belonged to them. Google would then have 24 hours to withdraw the content or face a daily fine of 1,000 euros ($1,295).
How will this ruling impact other archiving? From a research point of view, preventing Google or other companies from keeping copies of digital material that may have been long since lost is a bad thing. The law, unfortunately, is not on their side with this one.
But in the future, it said it would be up to copyright owners to get in touch with Google by e-mail to complain if the site was posting content that belonged to them. Google would then have 24 hours to withdraw the content or face a daily fine of 1,000 euros ($1,295).
How will this ruling impact other archiving? From a research point of view, preventing Google or other companies from keeping copies of digital material that may have been long since lost is a bad thing. The law, unfortunately, is not on their side with this one.
Related Stories
User Comments (6)
Post a comment| kitty500cat on February 13, 2007 5:20 PM | Why would you sue over that? If anything, Google's listing
just promotes the web site; it doesn't degrade it in any
way. But hey, if they can get money out of it...
|
| nathanskywalker on February 13, 2007 5:28 PM | the Belgium courts agreed that Google would have to
proactively contact copyright owners first before doing
such. If that's how they want it, their call.
Google should just drop them and let them see what happens
when Google doesn't index them.
|
| canadian on February 13, 2007 6:39 PM | What I want to know, is how a little court is able to do
something. Would I be able to go to my local court, make
sure the officials are on my side, and try to force Google
to contact every site on the internet to ask for permission
to scan it?
|
| OUTLAWXXX on February 13, 2007 7:28 PM | Its an European company thats why, they seem to HATE
American companies cause they completely KICK their ass in
business and technology. sad but true they are not good
innovators. oh and the American dollar is better than the
Euro that pisses them off too.
|
| Julio on February 14, 2007 1:04 AM | If this newspaper had a subscription based model for
archives then it makes sense not to want Google's cache. If
that was not the case though, it's plain stupid not to want
the cache which as was mentioned by Justin, only promotes
the website.
|
| Mictlantecuhtli on February 14, 2007 1:56 AM | I wonder what this kind of rulings mean to
The Internet Archive?
|
