also @ TechSpot: Apple TV updated with five new channels, including HBO Go and ESPN

USB powers up to the tune of 100W, new spec in the works

By

On August 11, 2011, 10:30 AM

Apple and Intel may be pushing Light Peak (aka Thunderbolt) technology forward as a true next-gen USB replacement, but that doesn't mean the latter will die so easily. The USB 3.0 Promoter Group is working on a new specification that will have USB 2.0 and 3.0 connections delivering up to 100 watts of power.

You may ask, how is this useful?

We could virtually power anything using a USB port. We already charge devices like smartphones and tablets using USB, and that's possible because the 4.5 watts delivered through current cables is sufficient. Now think about charging your laptop using USB, or more to the point, solely relying on USB connectivity to power your laptop at all times. Transmitting data simultaneously is part of the specification as well.

Key features of USB Power Delivery include:

  • Compatibillity with existing cables and connectors
  • Enables voltage and current values to be negotiated over the USB power pins
  • Enables higher voltage and current in order to deliver power up to 100W
  • Switchable source of power delivery without changing cable direction
  • Coexists with USB Battery Charging 1.2 and works equally well with both USB 2.0 and USB 3.0

A demonstration of the technology is expected by the end of the year, with a final revision of the specification to be delivered to the USB Implementers Forum (USB-IF) for publication and establishment sometime in 2012. As ExtremeTech likes to point out, just as Apple’s exclusive rights over Thunderbolt expire in spring 2012.

, , , ,

User Comments: 39

Got something to say? Post a comment
  1. Petert - I would rather get hit by a high voltage than a high current, example I would rather get hit by a 10,000 volt taser than grab both terminals on a 12 volt car battery....

  2. lol... I would rather touch a 12volt car battery myself. Given that the body has a resistance of kOhms, nothing would happen.

    Back to the books champ

  3. no one has mentioned that cable compatibility means this design will attempt to put

    100w thru 22 (or was it 24) gauge wire - - brain dead on arrival fellas!

    this AWG table shows

    that 22 guage can only handle 0.92 amps. With max current per USB connection at

    500ma, that's 6 watts (@12v). To get to 100W @12v, you need to deliver 8.3A and you get to kiss the 22guage cable goodbye.

    So as today is not April 1st and assuming that figures don't lie and the specification intends to actually deliver a product,

    we need to await that delivery and then evaluate the product as delivered.

    @Guest: The fine guys and gals that participate here have backgrounds that include actual work experience in far and highly varied fields,

    including Electrical Engineering. Sit back and enjoy the group. I might be a bold step on your part to actually become a member rather than continuing to harp under the anonymity cloaking of guest. No one will notice and you get to start with a clean slate

    If I had the choice of options, I would disable all posting by guests, not just this specific but on general principle.

  4. no one has mentioned that cable compatibility means this design will attempt to put

    100w thru 22 (or was it 24) gauge wire - - brain dead on arrival fellas!

    Well not in those specific terms, but DBZ and red had a few posts with that concept.

  5. Is it me or are all the guest posts in this thread complete rubbish?

    you can have 14,000 volts sent through your body as long as the current is pretty much non existant.

    you cannot have 24v through your body if the current is high as it will litterally cook your insides.

    Why is that so hard to grasp? And before anyone goes "you cannot have 14,000 volts sent through your body" yes you can, I can't quite remember where it was but back at school years ago we went on a science school trip and a girl in my class was chosen to come up on stage when they were doing a presentation, they made her hold these pieces of metal and then they wound some kind of device, her hair went a bit freezy and was xtremely attracted to baloons but appart from that she didn't even realise that 14,000v was travelling through her body, and the reason it all worked was because the current was pretty much not there!

  6. Voltage doesn't go thru your body, current does. That's why a taser is not (normally) leathal.

    When working on a car, have you ever been shocked by a bad spark plug cable?

    That can be upwards of 20kv, but the current is minuscule.

    Fatal shocks are as little as 5ma; see this wiki

    @SNGX1275; with some 30+ posts, I didn't see those comments :o

  7. @ guest under my post of "Petert - I would rather get hit by a high voltage than a high current, example I would rather get hit by a 10,000 volt taser than grab both terminals on a 12 volt car battery...."

    I have a background in electronics an will swear by my statement, and I will back it up with a rather graphic mental image of a less than careful co-worker that managed to accidentally complete the circuit on a car battery by means of an arm, and have his wedding ring fused into his skin. Give me a fork and a mains socket any day!

    Oh and registered members calling all guest posts pointless, wrong and useless; superiority complex much? Stick it up your arses and your fake forum names.

  8. From a 12v source 5ma IS possible e=ir ; e/i = ? 12/0.005 = 2400 ohms.

    entirely possible as the conductivity of skin varies inversely to wetness

    (ie the wetter you get, the lower the resistance )

    PS: jobeard is real; J. O. Beard (if you read the signature).

    Using real names reminds one to be carefull with what you say online.

    Nom de plume and ghost writers (imo) denigrate themselves due to some

    ulterior motive or some political necessity. As the kids are starting to say "MAN UP"

  9. Oh and registered members calling all guest posts pointless, wrong and useless; superiority complex much? Stick it up your arses and your fake forum names.

    Now, now...don't be going all butthurt on us.

    While there may be some members here who pin every Guest post with the stupid tag, I think you'll find that the prevailing sentiment here (much like the ever diminishing number of other sites that allow non-registration posting) is that for the occasional reasoned statement, it really isn't worth wading through the dross of "Guests" in the form of company shills, PR shills, drive-by kiddies, rampant fanboys, forum members from other sites spamming the threads, and generic internet trolls.

    Think that's an overstatement ? Be my Guest and use the search function to look for posts using the keywords (in alphabetical order) AMD, Apple, ATI, Intel, Microsoft, Nvidia, Sony, Windows etc... and look at the quality of the Guest posting...then ask yourself whether you think it was worthwhile spending the few minutes of your life reading them.

  10. Someone get Bill Nye in here..

  11. back at school years ago we went on a science school trip and a girl in my class was chosen to come up on stage when they were doing a presentation, they made her hold these pieces of metal and then they wound some kind of device, her hair went a bit freezy and was xtremely attracted to baloons but appart from that she didn't even realise that 14,000v was travelling through her body, and the reason it all worked was because the current was pretty much not there!

    Van de Graaff generator

  12. I take my, as devidebyzero so eloquently put "butthurt" comment back.

    After taking a scan at the comments I can completely agree 90% of the guest comments are moronic. I can understand why registered users dismiss these posts almost immediately, but consider this, people fly by these websites so often as there are so many, and want a small amount of instant input without going through the trouble of signing up.

    Would you like to sign up to every single website that you visit? No I hear you say.

    For the most part it seems registered users are the ones getting "butthurt" over guests comments, most of which are obviously "trolls"

  13. I left on a fairly long trip down the interstate and when I went to plug in the GPS an hour down the road it turns out one of the children had put a coin in the cigarette lighter/power connector. Had to ask for directions.

  14. I completely understand what registered users are talking about.

    anyways my input is this. I dont know ANYTHING about electricity other then how manny watts are needed for computer components, so i will not argue with anyone.

    my point is this = if they say it can be done im sure it can be, as for limitations im sure they know what they are and the problems that would arise if they dont take precautions.

    all in all i say everyone stop acting like children fighting over pitiful things with people that you wont ever see, and mean nothing to you or your life. Even if you do win the debate it doesnt mean anything. you get some satisfaction yes.

    but at the end of the day your input means nothing as USB will work out the bugs and issues and finally release the update.... just stop fighting and making a big deal out of nothing. Just be damn happy that we have a new update coming to our computers! -____-

    1-4 people will die yearly from shock. and no one will be able to over current their motherboard..

    USB has done very well so far, doubt they would be morons and not let concerns like all of yours fall on def ears....

Recently commented stories

Add New Comment

TechSpot Members
Login or sign up for free,
it takes about 30 seconds.
You may also...
Get complete access to the TechSpot community. Join thousands of technology enthusiasts that contribute and share knowledge in our forum. Get a private inbox, upload your own photo gallery and more.
TechSpot on:

Subscribe to TechSpot

Get free exclusive content, learn about new features and breaking tech news.