also @ TechSpot: Microsoft launches YouTube app, Google demands it taken down

Apple, Samsung to attend mediation in a bid to resolve patent war

By

On April 18, 2012, 9:30 AM

It appears there could be a potential settlement in the wings after representatives from Apple and Samsung were ordered (PDF) by Judge Lucy Koh of the San Jose District Court to meet in the next 90 days to discuss and hopefully come to a resolution in regards to their ongoing patent war.

It's not the first time a settlement has been offered, but it does appear to be the first genuine attempt by both parties to come to a suitable resolution. Although agreement to meet for mediation was not compulsory, both Apple and Samsung agreed to the sessions before the order was signed by the District Judge.

US District Judge Koh has presided over a number of cases between the two phone and tablet makers at a time when both sides were having mixed successes in the courtroom. According to the order, the meetings will be moderated by US Magistrate Judge Joesph C. Spero.

The meetings, which will include Apple CEO Tim Cook, as well as Samsung's counterpart, Gee-Sung Choi, will be held in San Francisco in the hope that both parties can resolve their disputes over various hardware and software patents covering phones and tablets.

Both companies have filed suits and counter-suits against each other in the last year. It all started after Apple filed a suit claiming that Samsung's products were "slavishly" copying their iPhone design, then followed on with similar claims regarding their iPad tablets.

Samsung responded by suing Apple claiming they were infringing on ten of their patents. Both parties ramped up the pressure filing multiple lawsuits in over 20 different countries in a bid to get each other's products banned from sale.

If no resolution can be agreed, a streamlined version of their claims and defenses will then be submitted back to the court.

, , , , , , , ,

Related Products from Product Finder

Apple iPad 2

The iPad 2 improves on the original in many ways, including a significantly faster dual-core CPU, improved graphics and a thinner footprint. The iPad 2 also manages to shave off 0.2 pounds for a total weight of 1.33 pounds on the Wi-Fi only model. Apple has included two cameras on the iPad 2 – a VGA-quality front facing lens for FaceTime and a rear-facing camera capable of recording 720p video.

97 Reviews

Apple iPad

The Apple iPad (3rd-gen) includes a Retina Display operating at a resolution of 2,048 x 1,536. Powering the new iPad is a dual-core A5X processor with quad-core graphics, it also gets upgraded optics in the form of a 5MP backside illuminated sensor that features a 5-element lens, IR filter and ISP built into the A5X chip. Apple claims The new iPad is good for 10 hours of battery life and nine hours when using 4G LTE.

79 Reviews

Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 GT-P7100

The Galaxy Tab 10.1 weighs 595 grams, it supports HSPA+ network speeds of up to 21Mbps, Bluetooth, and Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n connectivity. It also features a 3 megapixel rear camera and a 2 megapixel front camera, providing seamless 1080p HD video. The device is powered by a 1GHz dual core application processor and features a 1280 x 800 resolution WXGA display.

14 Reviews

Samsung Galaxy Tab Plus 7 inch

    CTRL + Q to Enable/Disable GoPhoto.it

5 Reviews

User Comments: 1

Got something to say? Post a comment
  1. While it might eb a good strategy according to some strategist with no hands on approach in the industry or company with their clients, this strategy can only hurt both companies in the long run.

    I find it akin to two racing drivers fighting for a position which only slows them both down and the driver'(s) behind can capatilise on this while the leaders are jockeying for position or for apple and samsung the best law suit so to speak.

    I understand samsung were in a defensive mode and that speaks volumes on how worried apple are that they have competition so really the ball is in apples court to start innovatin and stop legislating?

    It also serves no good regard for consumers to either company that engages in this whilst the same consumer (be it a plebian or otherwise buying a device) they would lack confidence in a company who is stuck in court in 20 odd countrys imho

Recently commented stories

Post a new comment

Social Login & Guest Posting TechSpot Members
Login here or sign up for free,
it takes about a minute.
Get complete access to the TechSpot community. Join thousands of technology enthusiasts that contribute and share knowledge in our forum. Get a private inbox, upload your own photo gallery and more.
TechSpot on:

Subscribe to TechSpot

Get free exclusive content, learn about new features and breaking tech news.