also @ TechSpot: IBM's Watson conquers Jeopardy, cancer and now customer service

Microsoft Surface trounced in browser benchmarks, iPad 3x faster

By

On November 5, 2012, 4:30 PM

With Microsoft's tablet offering finally in the wild, Futuremark took to Peacekeeper -- its own "universal" benchmark suite -- in order to determine how Surface stacks up against its competition. Perhaps surprisingly, benchmark monkeys discovered that Surface's test performance falls well behind leading competitors and that of higher-end smartphones.

Contrary to the many reviews which applaud the snappy responsiveness of Surface's multi-gesture-capable UI, Futuremark's synthetic tests indicate Apple's latest iPad man-handles HTML5 three times faster than Microsoft's $499 tablet. In fact, Surface -- which scored 348 points on Peacekeeper -- even falls behind the 3rd-gen iPad (522), the iPad Mini (515) and the Nexus 7 (522). 

Tablets aside, the iPhone 5 (907), Galaxy S III (680) and HTC One S (460) were the three top-scoring smartphones on the list, all of which managed to best Surface by rather cushy margins.

It's important to note that Peacekeeper is a browser-based benchmark, not unlike Google's Octane. The fact Peacekeeper runs from a browser is an obvious indicator of its software dependence and thus the major culprit on Surface's low results is bound to be IE10.

Speaking of which, Tom's Hardware shows Surface performing just as poorly under other browser-based benchmarks, including well-known tests like V8, Octane and Sunspider. Since Surface is powered by the same silicon found in the Nexus 7 -- a 1.3GHz Tegra 3 -- it seems evident Surface's benchmark-envy is likely a software issue. The Android-toting Nexus 7 performed almost twice as well under most benchmarks with its own browser.

So, is Surface's benchmark woes an issue with Windows 8 RT? IE10 mobile? Is it a bug, poor optimization or simply working as intended? For now, we can't really be certain However, the upshot here is that the tablet's performance may significantly improve through future software updates. That, at least, ought to give Surface owners a little something to look forward to.

, , , , , , ,

Related Products from Product Finder

Apple iPad

The Apple iPad (3rd-gen) includes a Retina Display operating at a resolution of 2,048 x 1,536. Powering the new iPad is a dual-core A5X processor with quad-core graphics, it also gets upgraded optics in the form of a 5MP backside illuminated sensor that features a 5-element lens, IR filter and ISP built into the A5X chip. Apple claims The new iPad is good for 10 hours of battery life and nine hours when using 4G LTE.

80 Reviews

Google Asus Nexus 7 inch

The Google Nexus 7 has the distinction of being the first device to run the Android 4.1 "Jelly Bean" operating system. It measures 198.5mm x 120mm x 10.45mm in size, weighs 340g, and features a 7-inch IPS display that is protected by scratch-resistant glass. The Nexus sports a 1280 x 800 pixel display. It runs a quad-core Tegra 3 processor and 1GB of RAM, it also comes in 2 versions: 8GB and 16GB capacities.

58 Reviews

Verizon Wireless Galaxy Nexus

Read expert reviews, pros & cons, and product information about Verizon Wireless Galaxy Nexus. There are 136 reviews available so far.

78 Reviews

AT&T iPhone 4S

The iPhone 4S looks identical to last year's model but comes in a new 64GB flavor and upgrades the camera to include an 8-megapixel sensor with improved low-light performance and 1080p video capture. In terms of performance the new iPhone is reportedly up to 2x faster and is also capable of running on faster HSPA+ networks, reaching theoretical download speeds of up to 14.4Mbps.

68 Reviews

User Comments: 10

Got something to say? Post a comment
  1. I'm not all that surprised. I say big woop. Show a common implementation of software running that has a horrible experience due to the slow processing of a surface device, or other. Or are they fast enough? When developers/designers raise a real user experience bar, then the browsers really need to step up their game. So great, Apple can relax and be a first world platform. =P

    I'm rather more interested in the perceived responsiveness vs the actual.

    I have not played that much with iPad and Surface... but I have noticed a big difference in how HTML5 content response on my iPhone 4S verses my Android tablet. My iPhone sometimes can be pretty slow. I think there are so many areas in which to focus speed and in the end (b/c well we are not yet doing HPC in the browser) responsiveness to user interaction is where it matters.

  2. Actually, the SunSpider test on the linked results from Tom's Hardware shows Surface to be overwhelmingly superior to the competition.

  3. This is why benchmarks don't mean much to me, I have tried out a Surface tablet and it was smooth and very quick. No matter what these benchmarks say the tablet performs well and don't show signs of lagging in what I wanted them to do.

  4. I am not surprised with apple since they have been putting all its eggs into the html5 basket. But since html5 is still not popular enough, it means nothing to me...

  5. HTML 5 is very popular. For example, in Gmail, you can drag and drop a file into the message to attach it. Anything that behaves like that is HTML 5. Google and other big names are embracing it, and it adds alot of convenience functionality to HTML vs. version 4. I was waiting for benchmarks and user reviews before deciding if I even wanted one. I think I would rather have the non RT version, the one that isn't out yet.

  6. I think I would rather have the non RT version, the one that isn't out yet.
    I think I will be saying that very statement for the next two or three years.

  7. Actually, the SunSpider test on the linked results from Tom's Hardware shows Surface to be overwhelmingly superior to the competition.

    And the BrowsingBench test also has it beating the Nexus 7 soundly. The benchmarks where it loses are Google created benchmarks, which would naturally favour Chrome.

  8. My results, windows 7 home premium x64

    opera 12.10 x86 1732

    opera 12.10 x64 1732

    firefox 16.02 1631

    ie9 509

    google chrome 22 3807

  9. The os on a surface also takes up 16 gig, while on the ipad it takes up 1 gig. So when you order a 32 gig device, you get twice as much storage on the ipad.

  10. I get the same results on both my Acer Iconia W500 C50 Windows 7-32bit tablet and Windows 7-64bit desktop pc.

    IE 9 - 2887

    Opera 12 - 3578

    Apple - Zzzzz

Recently commented stories

Post a new comment

Social Login & Guest Posting TechSpot Members
Login here or sign up for free,
it takes about a minute.
Get complete access to the TechSpot community. Join thousands of technology enthusiasts that contribute and share knowledge in our forum. Get a private inbox, upload your own photo gallery and more.
TechSpot on:

Subscribe to TechSpot

Get free exclusive content, learn about new features and breaking tech news.