Apple wants to open new Arizona sapphire plant ASAP to build 'critical' components

By on January 30, 2014, 1:30 PM
apple, manufacturing, arizona, sapphire, touch id, components

Construction on Apple’s new sapphire crystal manufacturing plant in Mesa, Arizona, is apparently moving along as a blistering pace – so much so that the Cupertino-based company has an aggressive plan to open the facility next month but it’s what Apple plans to use the new sapphire components for that has the Internet abuzz today.

9to5Mac was able to track down some documents showing correspondence between U.S. Foreign Trade Zone officials and Apple’s Deputy Director of Global Trade Compliance that were recently made public by the Foreign Trade Zones Board.

In the documents, Apple points out that the high-tech manufacturing process will create a critical new sub-component of Apple products to be used in the manufacture of the consumer electronics that will be imported and then sold globally.

The “critical new sub-components” is vague at best but suggests that Apple may be eyeballing the sapphire components for a completely new product. But exactly what new product are we talking about?

Earlier rumors suggest Apple is working with Foxconn to conduct a test run of sapphire iPhone displays, possibly for use on the iPhone 6. Such screens could offer superior scratch resistance qualities but at the same time, Apple could also be eyeballing the technology for other devices like iPads, iPods or the long-rumored iWatch. The latter option makes a lot of sense as the device would be out in the open most of the time on your wrist.

Another plausible option could include using the sapphire for the Touch ID Home button on future revisions of the iPad.




User Comments: 4

Got something to say? Post a comment
MilwaukeeMike said:

Wha-What?! Arizona?! They do know you have to pay tax if you're in this country right?

Guest said:

Is there a law that forces journalists to use slang words instead of a traditional language? I mean, the author has written "eyeballing" twice within several phrases. Why not write "Apple might be considering using this technology in other devices"? Why does it have to be "eyeballing" - it's not even proper English. Eyeballing is "staring or looking at something closely". It _could_ work if it would be "Apple is looking closely at a possibility of using the technology...", but staring at technology makes no sense at all. I wish authors would realise that people come to this site to actually read the news, and not praise the ability of copywriters to jargon-juggle.

Guest said:

If memory servers me right, apple tried this before with my lovely state but didnt go through since apple wanted a severely tax cut (next to nothing) to operate. Guess money talks and tax walks...

davislane1 davislane1 said:

Is there a law that forces journalists to use slang words instead of a traditional language? I mean, the author has written "eyeballing" twice within several phrases. Why not write "Apple might be considering using this technology in other devices"? Why does it have to be "eyeballing" - it's not even proper English. Eyeballing is "staring or looking at something closely". It _could_ work if it would be "Apple is looking closely at a possibility of using the technology...", but staring at technology makes no sense at all. I wish authors would realise that people come to this site to actually read the news, and not praise the ability of copywriters to jargon-juggle.

Get back in your zeppelin and fly away.

Load all comments...

Add New Comment

TechSpot Members
Login or sign up for free,
it takes about 30 seconds.
You may also...
Get complete access to the TechSpot community. Join thousands of technology enthusiasts that contribute and share knowledge in our forum. Get a private inbox, upload your own photo gallery and more.