TechSpot
 
Go Back   TechSpot OpenBoards > OS & Software > Windows OS
Forgot?

Welcome to the TechSpot OpenBoards. Please read the FAQ if you have any questions. Login to participate.

To XP3 or not to

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 05-17-2008, 01:18 PM
TonyGuitar TonyGuitar is offline
TechSpot Member
 
Location: Courtenay, British Columbia Vancouver Island
Member since: Sep 2005, 86 posts
To XP3 or not to

Guess I*ll pass on XP3,

It*s big, takes up a lot of room, has issues and blocks other software that works with XP2, so what*s the win for loading 460 / 1020 Mega bytes of bulge? [ Usual confusing MS *english language*]

[ This, from MS download SP3 site ]

** Hard disk space that is required if you install Windows XP SP3 from a shared folder on the network
System Restore feature enabled System Restore feature disabled
Working space 80 megabytes (MB) 80 MB
Files that remove Windows XP SP3 256 MB 256 MB
Total hard disk space that is required 1020 MB
1100 MB peak usage during installation 380 MB

460 MB peak usage during installation **

Sometimes I wonder why we in North America are so tolerant of the MS bulldozer. Europe is so choked with MS they have a 1- 1/2 Billion$ lawsuit underway against MS. = TG
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-17-2008, 01:45 PM
Aolish's Avatar
Aolish Aolish is offline
TechSpot Member
 
Location: NY
Member since: Apr 2007, 148 posts
every service packs has had problems in the past. i'm gonna wait till all the bugs get ironed out.
Reply With Quote
You can remove this banner by registering, join the TS Community for free.
  #3  
Old 05-17-2008, 09:26 PM
SNGX1275's Avatar
SNGX1275 SNGX1275 is offline
TS Special Forces
 
Location: Rolla, Missouri, USA
Member since: Feb 2002, 7,811 posts
System specs
I built a computer for a lady back in like 2000 or 2001 (AMD Duron 1Ghz) that I orginally put Windows 98 on I think. Then after she was having problems with it in 2002 I decided maybe I should put XP on it for her. So I did... flash forward to now, she had a problem with it (really simple boot problem) that I fixed today. The install date for XP on that machine was Tuesday, May 21 2002. It has been running for that long with no major problems, so I don't think I'm going to risk putting SP3 on it for her.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-18-2008, 01:16 AM
raybay raybay is offline
TechSpot Evangelist
 
Location: Four Corners, US
Member since: Dec 2006, 5,281 posts
SP-3 Definitely has problems with AMD cpu's... and with HP computers...
There is no reason to install it. The important downloads are still available as part of Windows update.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-18-2008, 10:11 AM
Bobbye Bobbye is offline
TechSpot Maniac
 
Member since: Mar 2007, 1,483 posts
Quote:
Guess I*ll pass on XP3,

It*s big, takes up a lot of room, has issues and blocks other software that works with XP2, so what*s the win for loading 460 / 1020 Mega bytes of bulge? [ Usual confusing MS *english language*]
Good iidea! Why invite trouble?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:18 AM.


  TechSpot  The PC Enthusiast Resource    |    News    |    Reviews    |    Guides    |    Downloads    |    Drivers    |    Forums    |    Pricewatch    |    News Archive    |    RSS Feeds
  Our Blog    |    Tech Deals    |   vb Sitemap    |    User Gallery    |    Startup Radar    |    Icons by Foood    |    Powered by StoryTeller    |    TechSpot in Spanish

  Copyright © 1998-2008 TechSpot.com. TechSpot is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy policy.
Advertising | About TechSpot 
TechSpot Pricewatch TechSpot Hot Deals
Windows Startup Radar Tips & Tricks (blog) Guides & Tweaks Windows updates
News Archive TechSpot Blog TechSpot RSS Feeds User Picture Gallery Techspot's IRC# (Chat) TechSpot in Spanish