also @ TechSpot: HP TouchPad running Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich
Welcome to the TechSpot OpenBoards. Please read the FAQ if you have any questions. Sign up or Login to participate.

Go Back   TechSpot OpenBoards > TechSpot Community > General Discussion

Collaborate in the cloud with Office, Exchange, SharePoint, and Lync

Anyone Else Use Safari (Windows Version)?

Reply
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 06-11-2008
Obi-Wan Jerkobi's Avatar
TechSpot Booster
 
Location: New York
Member since: Feb 2008, 592 posts
System specs
Anyone Else Use Safari (Windows Version)?

I absolutely love it. It is soo much faster than just about any web browser I've used, even Firefox 3 RC2 & IE7. It move's so fast, even on my Pentium 3 System (My Pentium 2 Mobo decided to finally R.I.P. :P).

Anyone else a fan?
  #2  
Old 06-11-2008
cfitzarl's Avatar
TechSpot Chancellor
 
Location: Boston, MA
Member since: Jun 2006, 2,519 posts
System specs
I've tried it, and I love the speed, but not the blurry text and lack of being able to right click and hit properties to find where a picture's location is >.< .
  #3  
Old 06-11-2008
Obi-Wan Jerkobi's Avatar
TechSpot Booster
 
Location: New York
Member since: Feb 2008, 592 posts
System specs
Wow!

That was a quick reply cfitzarl. Yeah, I'm still getting used to that. But at least most of the time when I embed images, they're my own so I know the filename.
  #4  
Old 06-12-2008
larryiam's Avatar
TechSpot Booster
 
Location: Tennessee, U.S.A
Member since: Jun 2008, 577 posts
System specs
It might be fast but it takes up alot of memory(ram) so ive heard. correct me plz if im wrong. so i never fooled with it. And yes apple has some catching up to do with their web browser.
  #5  
Old 06-12-2008
cfitzarl's Avatar
TechSpot Chancellor
 
Location: Boston, MA
Member since: Jun 2006, 2,519 posts
System specs
I'm used to threads getting replies every few seconds (from another site I'm a member of).

But in all fairness, I also realize that Safari is still in beta, and not all of the features have been added for fixed. I will wait until I see a stable release candidate for download, then try it again and see how it performs and acts .

Quote:
Originally Posted by larryiam
It might be fast but it takes up alot of memory(ram) so ive heard. correct me plz if im wrong. so i never fooled with it. And yes apple has some catching up to do with their web browser.
It takes up no more memory in your RAM than Firefox does (which usually takes up at least 50mb to 200mb for me)...I'm a big fan of keeping at least 5 tabs open at the same time .
  #6  
Old 06-12-2008
Obi-Wan Jerkobi's Avatar
TechSpot Booster
 
Location: New York
Member since: Feb 2008, 592 posts
System specs
Yeah, there are some bugs.

I've noticed the system specs object doesn't work in Safari.

And yes, larryiam, it does take up about 128MB of RAM on my PC. >_<
  #7  
Old 06-12-2008
larryiam's Avatar
TechSpot Booster
 
Location: Tennessee, U.S.A
Member since: Jun 2008, 577 posts
System specs
yes i agree cfitzarl. i will test it out then. now my heart belongs to firefox. lol
  #8  
Old 06-12-2008
Obi-Wan Jerkobi's Avatar
TechSpot Booster
 
Location: New York
Member since: Feb 2008, 592 posts
System specs
Quote:
Originally Posted by cfitzarl
But in all fairness, I also realize that Safari is still in beta, and not all of the features have been added for fixed. I will wait until I see a stable release candidate for download, then try it again and see how it performs and acts .
I didn't know it was still in beta!?
  #9  
Old 06-12-2008
larryiam's Avatar
TechSpot Booster
 
Location: Tennessee, U.S.A
Member since: Jun 2008, 577 posts
System specs
Quote:
Originally Posted by Obi-Wan Jerkobi
And yes, larryiam, it does take up about 128MB of RAM on my PC. >_<
Although it is a good browser and speedy to be in the beta stages!
  #10  
Old 06-12-2008
larryiam's Avatar
TechSpot Booster
 
Location: Tennessee, U.S.A
Member since: Jun 2008, 577 posts
System specs
Well true it not in official "beta" but its still in the works i think. But options are like a**holes everyone has one. lol
  #11  
Old 06-12-2008
Obi-Wan Jerkobi's Avatar
TechSpot Booster
 
Location: New York
Member since: Feb 2008, 592 posts
System specs
Quote:
Originally Posted by larryiam
Well true it not in official "beta" but its still in the works i think. But options are like a**holes everyone has one. lol
You mean opinions?

And maybe it's in a type of beta that everything on google is. You know, how everything on google is in beta, or has been in beta forever but still works as if it isn't. Especially stuff like google earth.
  #12  
Old 06-12-2008
larryiam's Avatar
TechSpot Booster
 
Location: Tennessee, U.S.A
Member since: Jun 2008, 577 posts
System specs
Yea man can't spell Well safari is officially not a beta.....i think it will need alot of work(beta to me for a while) haha like google
  #13  
Old 06-12-2008
Obi-Wan Jerkobi's Avatar
TechSpot Booster
 
Location: New York
Member since: Feb 2008, 592 posts
System specs
Complete Safari vs. Firefox 3 1.0.1!

Who will win?
  #14  
Old 06-12-2008
SNGX1275's Avatar
TechSpot Forces Special
 
Location: Rolla, Missouri, USA
Member since: Feb 2002, 10,816 posts
System specs
Safari is being built based on Webkit, which is based on Konqueor from linux, but not its being worked on by Apple, Google, Nokia and probably some others.

I'm not entirely sure Safari 2 (is that even the one on Windows, or are you guys on Safari 3) is based on Webkit, it probably is but I can't say for sure. In any case, I have noticed in OS X how much faster Webkit is than anything else I have used. I just don't like how it handles tabs/new windows, but firefox is just as bad. Opera is the only truely great tabbed browser I've used (I'm sure its just what you get used to, but without extensions and configuration Opera will not open a link in a new window unless you specifically tell it to, always a tab). Now I've lost where I was going... but I guess to wrap it up, Safari is making great progress, make things always open in tabs, and make it block ads better (or at least allow a user to manually do that) and I'll be happy.
  #15  
Old 06-12-2008
larryiam's Avatar
TechSpot Booster
 
Location: Tennessee, U.S.A
Member since: Jun 2008, 577 posts
System specs
My perspective
Firefox because it has the ability to have themes, add ons, and less pop ups, and is more secure.
safari only has speed and load times.

And your perspective...............hope i spelled that right!

Last edited by larryiam; 06-12-2008 at 12:28 AM..
  #16  
Old 06-12-2008
larryiam's Avatar
TechSpot Booster
 
Location: Tennessee, U.S.A
Member since: Jun 2008, 577 posts
System specs
Quote:
Originally Posted by SNGX1275
Safari is being built based on Webkit, which is based on Konqueor from linux, but not its being worked on by Apple, Google, Nokia and probably some others.

I'm not entirely sure Safari 2 (is that even the one on Windows, or are you guys on Safari 3) is based on Webkit, it probably is but I can't say for sure. In any case, I have noticed in OS X how much faster Webkit is than anything else I have used. I just don't like how it handles tabs/new windows, but firefox is just as bad. Opera is the only truely great tabbed browser I've used (I'm sure its just what you get used to, but without extensions and configuration Opera will not open a link in a new window unless you specifically tell it to, always a tab). Now I've lost where I was going... but I guess to wrap it up, Safari is making great progress, make things always open in tabs, and make it block ads better (or at least allow a user to manually do that) and I'll be happy.
SNGX1275 that is very well put!
  #17  
Old 06-12-2008
Obi-Wan Jerkobi's Avatar
TechSpot Booster
 
Location: New York
Member since: Feb 2008, 592 posts
System specs
Quote:
Originally Posted by SNGX1275
Safari is being built based on Webkit, which is based on Konqueor from linux, but not its being worked on by Apple, Google, Nokia and probably some others.

I'm not entirely sure Safari 2 (is that even the one on Windows, or are you guys on Safari 3) is based on Webkit, it probably is but I can't say for sure. In any case, I have noticed in OS X how much faster Webkit is than anything else I have used. I just don't like how it handles tabs/new windows, but firefox is just as bad. Opera is the only truely great tabbed browser I've used (I'm sure its just what you get used to, but without extensions and configuration Opera will not open a link in a new window unless you specifically tell it to, always a tab). Now I've lost where I was going... but I guess to wrap it up, Safari is making great progress, make things always open in tabs, and make it block ads better (or at least allow a user to manually do that) and I'll be happy.
This is actually kind of Coincidence because I wanted to try out Safari because Firefox and Opera didn't seem like they were using my IC to it's full potential. Turns out, they weren't! The tab thing doesn't bother me, as I use IE5 at school so I'm used to the spamming of windows instead of tabs. :P

Although, I do have to agree Opera is the most secure browser...ever...I have never got a single tracking cookie while using Opera, (a few with Firefox, a lot with IE).
  #18  
Old 06-12-2008
larryiam's Avatar
TechSpot Booster
 
Location: Tennessee, U.S.A
Member since: Jun 2008, 577 posts
System specs
i have heard that if opera keeps going its going to be a great browser. I have never tried it yet though. But i will!
  #19  
Old 06-12-2008
Obi-Wan Jerkobi's Avatar
TechSpot Booster
 
Location: New York
Member since: Feb 2008, 592 posts
System specs
You should, it's great for checking out sites you don't trust!
  #20  
Old 06-12-2008
SNGX1275's Avatar
TechSpot Forces Special
 
Location: Rolla, Missouri, USA
Member since: Feb 2002, 10,816 posts
System specs
Once Opera 9.5 goes live (you can get its beta now) it will be fantastic. The ability to easily, effortlessly, have access to your bookmarks, no matter what system you are on is brilliant. I've been using the 9.5alpha and betas for a while now and they are fantastic. I can't honestly say they have been trouble free, I have had sites not load properly, and I have often had sites with embedded flash video not actually play the flash vid, so it is by no means perfect, but that is to be expected, its alpha and beta software and if you can't live with that don't use it.

But back on subject. Safari is definately on the right track to become an excellent browser. For those of you that hated Opera because it wasn't open source you now have a new competitor that is open source, and it has Apple behind it, and Apple's direct intention is to place it into their OS, so there is no screwing around. Safari/Webkit is the real deal, and if you don't think they are a competitor to FF/Opera/IE you are kidding yourself.
Reply
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Similar Topics
Topic Replies Forum
Anybody tried Safari for Windows? 20 Software Apps
Safari (Windows) Doesn't Play .mp3 files 1 Software Apps
Safari shock-wave problem [windows version] 1 Windows OS
Safari for Windows Beta 7 Software Apps
Windows Media Technologies Not Compatible With This Version of Windows 4 Windows OS

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:57 PM.