also @ TechSpot: Microsoft's Indian online store hacked, passwords and user data exposed
Welcome to the TechSpot OpenBoards. Please read the FAQ if you have any questions. Sign up or Login to participate.

Go Back   TechSpot OpenBoards > TechSpot Editorial and Site Feedback > TechSpot News and Comments

Collaborate in the cloud with Office, Exchange, SharePoint, and Lync

EVGA intros the Hybrid GTX 275 Co-op PhysX graphics card

Page 1 of 2 1 2
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 11-03-2009
Matthew's Avatar
TechSpot Editor, Community Manager
 
Location: Pennsylvania
Member since: Feb 2008, 4,974 posts
System specs
EVGA intros the Hybrid GTX 275 Co-op PhysX graphics card

EVGA has announced a new dual-GPU video card, aptly named the Hybrid GTX 275 Co-op PhysX. The card houses both Nvidia GTX 275 and GTS 250 chips, which are linked together in some form of Hybrid SLI configuration. The GTX 275 is responsible for rendering graphics, while the GTS 250 tackles all of the PhysX calculations -- an interesting offer, even if Fermi is just around the corner.

Read the whole story
__________________
"Dependence begets subservience and venality, suffocates the germ of virtue, and prepares fit tools for the designs of ambition." -Thomas Jefferson
  #2  
Old 11-03-2009
TechSpot Member
 
Member since: Sep 2008, 133 posts
If the price drops to the $200-$299 range i'd probably get this(wife won't allow me to spend over 300 for a card as i've been looking for one). Of course...i'd really love to see some benchmarking of this card..hint hint :)
  #3  
Old 11-03-2009
TechSpot Chancellor
 
Location: Seattle
Member since: Feb 2009, 1,544 posts
System specs
Great idea, but doesn't come with DirectX 11 support. If I was buying a card today, I wouldn't consider any that didn't have DirectX 11 capabilities.
  #4  
Old 11-03-2009
TechSpot Enthusiast
 
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Member since: Dec 2005, 187 posts
System specs
I would agree with TomSEA. DX11 looks amazing and I wouldn't invest any money in a non-DX11 card. Personally I am waiting on an AMD 5850X2 to come out to replace my 3870 card.
  #5  
Old 11-03-2009
treeski's Avatar
TechSpot Booster
 
Location: Chicago, USA
Member since: Nov 2007, 444 posts
System specs
Yeah it's hard for me to formulate an opinion of this thing without seeing some performance tests and how it compares to other cards.
  #6  
Old 11-03-2009
TechSpot Enthusiast
 
Member since: Dec 2005, 178 posts
mmh, it's a bit useless in my opinion but it looks to me that nvidia is trying to promote phsyx. the power consuption is a bit too high in my mind.
  #7  
Old 11-03-2009
JieMan's Avatar
TechSpot Member
 
Location: Maine, USA
Member since: Oct 2008, 65 posts
System specs
The need for this isn't really needed much at the moment I feel its just a marketing ploy from EVGA, As NVIDIA is prepping for DX11 EVGA should have waited till then.
I can see if you only have the combination of one PCI E x16 slot ( which is probably the majority of people) and a low PSU.
I like the idea of this and think that it will allow for some good things to come, as NVIDIA is pushing for GPGPU this might work well as a program accelerator too.
The new NVIDIA beta drivers have already adopted OpenCl so who knows whats gonna happen.

  #8  
Old 11-03-2009
pioneerx01's Avatar
TechSpot Enthusiast
 
Location: Arizona
Member since: Jul 2006, 319 posts
System specs
So, I I get 2 or 3 of them in SLI will the Phys-X be in SLI too?
  #9  
Old 11-03-2009
Wagan8r's Avatar
TechSpot Booster
 
Member since: Sep 2006, 442 posts
System specs
I saw this yesterday on EVGA's website, and I have to say it's a bit of a questionable move on EVGA's part. It's catering to the high-end segment, but lacking any DirectX 11 support, and with the GF100 apparently arriving in December, I don't see much demand for this card. It IS a pretty sweet idea though!
  #10  
Old 11-03-2009
Xclusiveitalian's Avatar
TechSpot Booster
 
Location: NYC, NY
Member since: Jan 2009, 496 posts
System specs
No DX 11 support kinda kills it for me, tho i bet the card is extremely powerful. What's the point of the joker picture if once it is in your pc you won't ever see it anyway lol
  #11  
Old 11-03-2009
TechSpot Enthusiast
 
Location: Canada
Member since: Oct 2009, 392 posts
Sounds like a risky technological venture. Now we're heading in a direction where you need a video card AND a physx card (or a hybrid card in this case)? Why don't we start chopping up the motherboard into further sub components and allow the enthusiast even more computer hardware customising?
  #12  
Old 11-03-2009
Guest
 
I'd like to get one of them.. is it abaliavle? .. if so, where?
  #13  
Old 11-03-2009
klepto12's Avatar
TechSpot Maniac
 
Location: Booneville, Arkansas
Member since: Dec 2008, 1,281 posts
System specs
seems kinda a waste of a card but is kinda a cool idea
  #14  
Old 11-03-2009
MBK's Avatar
MBK MBK is offline
TechSpot Member
 
Member since: Oct 2009, 43 posts
This looks like a nice way around computers getting even bigger. Assuming that the thing doesn't consume two PCI-E slots (which it looks like it might), it removes the need for an additional physics card, which is gonna be a necessity in the near future.

The price seems reasonable enough for a release, a lot of relally high end cards are of a similar price range on release. Though, I never buy the things at that price (that's a lie, I did once, saved up a lot of pocket money)
  #15  
Old 11-03-2009
TechSpot Member
 
Member since: Jan 2007, 40 posts
Interesting idea but pointless nice other available cards will be considerably faster for the same or less $.. EVGA marking = FAIL
  #16  
Old 11-03-2009
TechSpot Paladin
 
Member since: Jan 2006, 425 posts
System specs
Are the days of high-end cards being north of the $500 dollar mark gone? I welcome our $300 cards, but what I miss the most is the performance that we used to get with a new card. I'd love for someone to correct me if I'm wrong, but there are no cards out today or tomorrow which can offer 3 digit FPS in Crysis yet, (1680x1050 high quality) right? And it's been that way since Crysis came out 2 years ago. (Pretty lame of the GPU boffins.)
  #17  
Old 11-03-2009
Deso's Avatar
TechSpot Member
 
Location: Wisconsin
Member since: Oct 2009, 130 posts
System specs
Awesome to see some new idea's in the graphics market, I always wondered why they couldn't build PhysX into the card instead of having a separate card doing it. Good jon nvidia!, I also hope they will release 300 series co-op cards with PhysX in time with the fermi
  #18  
Old 11-03-2009
TechSpot Member
 
Member since: Oct 2009, 30 posts
I don't think anyone would even consider buying this, I mean it's cool and all and a good idea, but now we need cards to support DX11. The tessellation in it looks utterly amazing.
  #19  
Old 11-04-2009
Guest
 
I would totally bye this if the price dropped to like $250 the very least
  #20  
Old 11-04-2009
TechSpot Paladin
 
Member since: Oct 2009, 603 posts
System specs
Seems to me there's an error in the specs posted. The 275 will run at 633MHz, while the 250 will run at 738MHz. This is in line with the standard clock speed of these chips.

I wonder how much north of $300 this will cost, though frankly I think it will not be worth buying unless its price premium over a normal 275 is very small. I think that anyone buying it will be really sorry later that they didn't wait for Fermi or bought an ATI.
Closed Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Similar Topics
Topic Replies Forum
EVGA intros enthusiast four-way SLI X58 motherboard 17 TechSpot News and Comments
EVGA GeForce GTX480 1536 MB DDR5 PCI-Express 2.0 Graphics Card (pre-order) 0 Hot Deals
Nvidia quietly intros first GeForce 300-series graphics card 91 TechSpot News and Comments
ATI Hybrid Graphics vs Discrete Graphics 1 Audio and Video
Does the eVGA e-GeForce 7300 GS Graphics Card compatible with Vista? 1 Audio and Video

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:47 PM.