A decade later: How Microsoft flushed $7.6 billion down the drain when it bought Nokia

zohaibahd

Posts: 935   +19
Staff
Looking back: It's been a decade since Microsoft made one of the most disastrous acquisitions in tech history – buying Nokia's struggling phone business for a whopping $7.2 billion. The deal was supposed to help Microsoft gain a foothold in the rapidly growing smartphone market dominated by Apple's iOS and Google's Android. Instead, it ended up being an epic failure that the Redmond firm ultimately wrote off as a massive tax loss.

The story begins around 2010 when Nokia, once a titan of the mobile phone industry, was failing to keep up with its Silicon Valley rivals. The Finnish company had pioneered many mobile technologies but was late to the smartphone game. Its antiquated Symbian operating system was no match for the slick iOS and Android software powering iPhones and the latest Android devices.

In what seemed like a desperate move, Nokia's board replaced its Finnish CEO with Stephen Elop, a Canadian executive from Microsoft. Almost immediately, Elop made the decision to ditch Symbian and stake Nokia's future on Microsoft's Windows Phone platform. Now, things weren't really going well for Symbian – it was notoriously difficult to code for. But Nokia's fatal mistake was not going for Android, or perhaps ditching the open-source effort, 'Maemo.'

Still, there was logic in the rationale, too; Nokia had global hardware distribution and Microsoft could provide the software. But there was one fatal flaw – Windows Phone was widely panned as a lackluster also-ran operating system that did not seem very lucrative to app developers. Why go through the trouble of developing for a third platform when iOS and Android were already doing so well?

Also read: Nokia: The Story of the Once-Legendary Phone Maker

By 2013, Microsoft decided to buy Nokia's handset business outright, while granting the remaining Nokia company extensive patent rights. The $7.2 billion price tag gave Nokia a cash infusion but was seen by many as an overpay by Microsoft for an asset that was rapidly becoming obsolete.

The acquisition brought Elop back into the Microsoft fold as the new head of its devices division. But he didn't last long after Microsoft's CEO transition from Steve Ballmer to Satya Nadella in 2014. Nadella realized the mobile strategy was a failure and quickly began winding it down.

In a brutal move in July 2015, Nadella announced Microsoft was taking a staggering $7.6 billion write-off on the Nokia acquisition and eliminating 7,800 jobs, primarily in the phone hardware division. It was one of the largest such write-downs in corporate history.

The Nokia deal had been pitched as giving Microsoft the assets to become a "devices and services" company. Instead, it simply highlighted how far behind Microsoft had fallen in the mobile race.

Microsoft has now pivoted to be more cloud-focused under Nadella's leadership. But ten years later, the Nokia debacle serves as a reminder that even giants can crumble when they fail to keep up with tectonic technology shifts.

Permalink to story:

 
It's a shame this happened, I bet Nokia would still be a decent player had they gone the Android route.
 
How about how it flushed 7000 Nokia jobs down the drain. I couldn't care less it lost $8 billion. It was a repugnant decision to allow them to buy them out in the first place like 99.99% of all tech takeovers.
Nokia was a dead man walking when Microsoft purchased them; Nokia suffered by its failure to keep up with shifting consumer expectations. The jobs "lost" were replaced a hundred times over by new jobs in the then-burgeoning smart phone sector.

As for "allowing them" to be purchased, there's that whole "freedom" thing the Western world has valued rather highly since the Humanist revolution. Why not get on board?
 
Nokia was a dead man walking when Microsoft purchased them; Nokia suffered by its failure to keep up with shifting consumer expectations. The jobs "lost" were replaced a hundred times over by new jobs in the then-burgeoning smart phone sector.

As for "allowing them" to be purchased, there's that whole "freedom" thing the Western world has valued rather highly since the Humanist revolution. Why not get on board?
Live free or die
 
The really dumb thing about it, Nokia had *3* Symbian repalcements (at least) in play. They got at least 2 of the 3 to the point where they were ready to ship devices; shipped ONE Maemo device (which apparently the users loved), then scrapped all 3 OSes (well, all 3 were Linux but with radically different software stacks on top).

A) Even at the time, it sounded ridiculous -- like all 3 were being run like a skunkworks, and nobody stepped in to have them share code and effort where it made sense. So 3 independent ports of the Linux kernel to the hardware; 3 teams working on graphics toolkits. I think all 3 were going to have SOME provision for running Symbian apps but all 3 independently developed. It sounds like nobody even stepped in to say "Well, maybe we should focus more on this one" until all the way at the end where they instead scrapped all 3!

B) At the end there was probably little for them to do. Apparently Maemo was very well liked on the N900, but I think they were running low on cash -- spending 5+ years developing 3 different OSes is apparently a tad expensive! I mean, they should have gone with Android probably. But they didn't.

C) The one thing I recall reading about Windows on the Nokia devices (other than the usual complaints of Windows Phone 8 being a tad slow, not having enough apps, etc.) was the ridiculous limitation that the Windows camera app never supported the full resolution of the camera! It had some limit of like 2048x2048 pictures (which was not uncommon at the time, since most digital pics were under 1 megapixel -- 1024x1024. There were assumptions in very old versions of ImageMagick for example, that if you came across some pic that claimed it was like 10000x8000 or something that it was probably an attempt at a buffer overflow or a denial of service attack by using up all your system memory.) But despite Microsoft now making the software AND the hardware, they didn't remove this size limit (or increase it to higher than the camera resolution at least) to accommodate the like 8 megapixel camera in these!. So the camera app would have to cut the resolution by like half to save the pic! Apparently after an update they at least let it grab a full resolution pic IF you zoomed (since "digital zoom" just cuts off the edges of the picture, cut off enough and what's left is under 2048x2048.) I mean really, THAT's pretty lazy!
 
MicroSoft is a business of buying and selling tech stuff, but they certainly can NOT develop or understand much on the side of developing.
So, they screwed up here, but they screwed up in many other fields too. They are too much to report.
 
How about how it flushed 7000 Nokia jobs down the drain. I couldn't care less it lost $8 billion. It was a repugnant decision...
Horrendous human cost, particularly for a small country like Finland. The civilian equivalent of a war crime in my opinion.
 
Back