AI could erase half of all entry-level white-collar jobs within five years, warns Anthropic CEO

midian182

Posts: 10,712   +142
Staff member
What just happened? Hearing people warn about the danger that generative AI presents to the global job market is concerning enough, but it's especially worrying when these ominous predictions come from those behind the technology. Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, believes that AI could wipe out about half of all entry-level white-collar jobs in the next five years, leading to unemployment spikes up to 20%.

Amodei made his comments during an interview with Axios. He said that AI companies and the government needed to stop "sugar-coating" the potential mass elimination of jobs across technology, finance, law, consulting and other white-collar professions, with entry-level jobs most at risk.

Amodei said he was making this warning public in the hope that the government and other AI giants such as OpenAI will start preparing ways to protect the nation from a situation that could get out of hand.

"Most of them are unaware that this is about to happen," Amodei said. "It sounds crazy, and people just don't believe it."

The CEO's comments are backed up by reports into the state of the jobs market. The US IT job market declined for the second year in a row in 2024. There was also a report from SignalFire that found Big Tech's hiring of new graduates is down by over 50% compared to the pre-pandemic levels of 2019. Startups, meanwhile, have seen their hiring of new grads fall by over 30% during the same period.

We're also seeing huge layoffs across multiple tech companies, a large part of which can be attributed to AI replacing workers' duties.

The one bit of good news for workers is that some firms, including Klarna and Duolingo, are finding that the subpar performance of these bots and the public's negative feelings toward their use are forcing companies to start hiring humans again.

Amodei's Anthropic AI firm is playing its own part in all this, of course. The company's latest Claude 4 AI model can code at a proficiency level close to that of humans – it's also very good at lying and blackmail.

"We, as the producers of this technology, have a duty and an obligation to be honest about what is coming," Amodei said. "I don't think this is on people's radar."

The AI arms race in this billion-dollar industry is resulting in LLMs improving all the time. And with the US in a battle to stay ahead of China, regulation is rarely high on the government's agenda.

AI companies tend to claim that the technology will augment jobs, helping people become more productive. That might be true right now, but it won't be long before the systems are able to replace the people they are helping.

Amodei says the first step in addressing the problem is to make people more aware of what jobs are vulnerable to AI replacement. Helping workers better understand how AI can augment their jobs could also mitigate job losses, as would more government action. Or there's always OpenAI CEO Sam Altman's solution: universal basic income, though that will come with plenty of issues of its own.

Masthead: kate.sade

Permalink to story:

 
As one whose job is almost over because of AI, I feel the sting of it, if anyone does. Nonetheless, being fond of science fiction, I've neither grudged AI nor wished that the development would stop. It was inevitable when the conjunction of computer science, computation, and manufacturing had reached a certain point; and it's certainly remarkable that we've got real-life KITTs today.

I think the reason many are against AI is, obviously, the fear of the unknown and the loss of jobs, as well as what may be called human exceptionialism: the idea that humans are special and unique in their abilities, a concept that AI is eroding, doing well in the very fields that were the domain of human creativity. It's certainly behind us, but will catch up, and we ourselves never get upgraded, at least not until some sort of "post-human" engineering.
 
Yes… and mechanized farming will end most of the farming jobs… but… people will adapt and find different jobs…

It’s how human history has ALWAYS progressed… technology makes certain jobs obsolete so we devise new ones…
I think it is a bit different this time. The scale, the endless abilities to allow AI do more and more cannot compare to anything before. In the past, humanity made inventions that made a lot of jobs obsolete while giving it hew tools to make jobs much faster. Soon, AI alone will be able to use all of those invented tools to do most of the jobs.
I am neither very pessimistic nor optimistic, it seems like this time it will be different.
 
I think it is a bit different this time. The scale, the endless abilities to allow AI do more and more cannot compare to anything before. In the past, humanity made inventions that made a lot of jobs obsolete while giving it hew tools to make jobs much faster. Soon, AI alone will be able to use all of those invented tools to do most of the jobs.
I am neither very pessimistic nor optimistic, it seems like this time it will be different.
And throughout history, some people have always thought “this time is different”… and while each case IS different, in the end, mankind always adapts and moves on.

Of course, that doesn’t mean individuals won’t suffer from AI… it’s only society at large that will be fine… there are always those who can’t adapt and suffer for it.
 
World needs more volunteers to set on fire all those companies, along with CEO-s. This is where it is all going, driving the world to further desperation. I am seeing soup queues growing rapidly in the city centre. It will get much worse soon.
 
Not possible, because if you have no Entry level jobs, then there would be no mid-level jobs, which would mean there are no high-level ones either. Paranoia is a real thing, but people need to just stfu and breathe sometimes...
 
Well, we're in for a ride. French Revolution happened when civilization transitioned from feudalism to capitalism governance. Entire generations was lost in wars that ensued.

Russian Revolution happened as a result of Industrial revolution. Bloody wars all over the continent and two World Wars, that's the price of technological advancement without sociological advancement. That is when elites think it will be fine to screw over people and genuinely surprised once their *** gets delivered to them.


My generation won't see this through, I am glad we won't. There's much turmoil ahead for next fifty to a hundred years until social advance catches up with technology advanced.
 
It will in the west- but due to how regulations work, it will take around 15-20 years for it to really have an impact (the biggest companies will adapt first, due to the cost of first gen AI)
Examples of jobs that will vanish first are - Taxi, Warehouse jobs, Delivery jobs, grocery store jobs, support jobs and bank jobs.
Then after a while, jobs like apothecaries, train drivers, bus drivers etc.
There will be an immediate rush of poverty in some countries like the US that has little to no unemployment security net - then society will adjust either through a «minimum citizen salary» or through new types of jobs.
Some countries will still be smart enough to «force» companies to have real humans as supplementary workers in the positions while others won’t
 
Yes… and mechanized farming will end most of the farming jobs… but… people will adapt and find different jobs…
I think having machines to perform just basic functions is very different from having machines that can think for themselves, adapt and perform almost all roles, but we'll see...I feel bad for the youth of today - we broke the environment, we over-bred, we allowed lunatics into power and now we are creating machines to do their jobs.
 
As one whose job is almost over because of AI, I feel the sting of it, if anyone does. Nonetheless, being fond of science fiction, I've neither grudged AI nor wished that the development would stop. It was inevitable when the conjunction of computer science, computation, and manufacturing had reached a certain point; and it's certainly remarkable that we've got real-life KITTs today.

I think the reason many are against AI is, obviously, the fear of the unknown and the loss of jobs, as well as what may be called human exceptionialism: the idea that humans are special and unique in their abilities, a concept that AI is eroding, doing well in the very fields that were the domain of human creativity. It's certainly behind us, but will catch up, and we ourselves never get upgraded, at least not until some sort of "post-human" engineering.

Nicely put, the paradox of bearing personal cost from a development you nonetheless recognize as both inevitable and extraordinary. That tension, between loss and awe, I think, at the heart of this moment in history.

You're right to identify fear, particularly of the unknown and of obsolescence, as a driving force behind resistance to AI. But it's the deeper wound, what you call human exceptionalism, that feels most existential.

For centuries, our species has defined itself by certain faculties....reason, language, creativity, etc. To see these mimicked, even matched, by machines forces us to ask, "What, then, is the human?"

It is not merely our tools that are evolving, rather it is the mirror they hold up to us. AI doesn’t just automate labor, it challenges our metaphysical footing. And unlike past technologies, which extended human capacity, this one begins to replicate it. The craftsman was once replaced by the machine...now the thinker, the artist, even the dreamer sees their domain intruded upon.

Perhaps, as you suggest, our sense of self has always rested on fragile foundations. And maybe the post-human era, if it comes, won’t just be about machines becoming more like us, but us finally confronting what we are without the myths we have been telling ourselves.

It is coming, it can not be stopped, that is inevitable, and how we deal and grow with it is the real challenge.
 
Back