Apple has under 30 days to comply with EU rules or face daily fines

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 645   +15
Staff
The big picture: Apple and the European Commission are locked in a standoff over how tech firms should be regulated – a conflict being closely watched by the tech industry, app developers, and consumer advocates. The outcome could set a precedent for how digital marketplaces operate, not only in Europe but globally, as other jurisdictions consider similar measures to promote competition and curb the power of tech giants.

Apple is facing a critical deadline in the European Union, with fewer than 30 days remaining to overhaul its App Store practices or face additional financial penalties from the European Commission. The warning follows the Commission's determination that Apple's current policies continue to violate the Digital Markets Act (DMA), a sweeping regulation aimed at curbing the power of major tech platforms and fostering greater competition in digital markets.

At the heart of the dispute are Apple's longstanding restrictions that prevent app developers from informing users about alternative ways to purchase digital goods or subscriptions outside the App Store. Under the DMA, companies designated as "gatekeepers" must allow developers to communicate freely with customers about external offers and payment methods, without imposing barriers or excessive fees.

The Commission found that Apple's rules – including so-called "anti-steering" provisions and technical barriers – made it unnecessarily difficult for developers to direct users to external payment options.

In April, the European Commission fined Apple €500 million (about $569 million) for these violations and ordered the company to remove the restrictions. Apple was given a 60-day window to comply, with less than a month now remaining before the June 22 deadline. If Apple fails to meet the requirements, the Commission has made it clear it will impose additional periodic fines, which could reach up to five percent of Apple's daily global revenue until compliance is achieved.

Despite some changes to its App Store policies in the EU, including allowing developers to include a single external link to their own websites, regulators say Apple's approach still falls short. Developers must use Apple's format for these links, display warnings to users about leaving the Apple ecosystem, and pay a 27 percent commission on purchases made through external links – only slightly less than the standard 30 percent fee for in-app transactions.

The Commission argues that these measures "undermine the effectiveness" of the DMA and continue to restrict competition.

Apple has strongly objected to the Commission's findings and the size of the fine, arguing that the requirements threaten user privacy and security and effectively force the company to give away its technology for free. In a statement, Apple called the decision "bad for innovation, bad for competition, bad for our products, and bad for users." The company has signaled its intention to appeal the ruling, but must still comply with the Commission's order while the legal process unfolds.

The European Commission, for its part, maintains that Apple's privacy and security concerns are not substantiated, and that the DMA's goal is to ensure consumers and developers benefit from real choice and fairer digital markets. The law, which took effect in 2023, is part of a broader push by EU regulators to curb the dominance of large tech firms and open up their platforms to greater competition.

Permalink to story:

 
"Apple has strongly objected to the Commission's findings and the size of the fine, arguing that the requirements threaten user privacy and security and effectively force the company to give away its technology for free."

What does Apple think it's giving away for free? User Privacy and Security has always been rubbish used to scare people into siding with Apple, but what do they think they're giving away for free here?
 
Oh no, Apple will actually have to compete and give better incentive to use their Appstore/payment features/etc. in the smartphone markets.

Overall a win for consumers (they might actually own their phones properly now) and developers (who don't have to compete unfairly against Apple).

Apple can no longer sit on their laurels if they want more than their stubborn fan's, or tech illiterate user's, money beyond the hardware purchase.
 
including allowing developers to include a single external link to their own websites, regulators say Apple's approach still falls short.
Oh thank you Apple, in my own app I may link to my own site? Thank you, so generous.

Developers must use Apple's format for these links, display warnings to users about leaving the Apple ecosystem, and pay a 27 percent commission on purchases made through external links – only slightly less than the standard 30 percent fee for in-app transactions.
Such BS.
So I get the user to leave the app after bombarding them in language to discourage doing so and then Apple wants 27% for any purchases on my site that they have nothing to do with... (and 3-4% to the payment provider.

, Apple called the decision "bad for innovation, bad for competition, bad for our products, and bad for users."
Yes, typically allowing people to do more stuff is bad for innovation.
Ah yes, allowing other stores and other payment providers sounds like it'd be bad for competition. Maybe Apple should get 27% of the payment made through another provider for no reason - that'll keep prices competitive.
Ah yes bad for their products because uhhh, nope I got nothing.
Bad for their users, a yes. Because they're mentally challenged and for a good laugh they'll go and find the dodgiest third party store to install the dodgiest apps from. Heaven forbid they're allowed to do such a thing, maybe Apple should be the one approving of the other stores and what they're allowed to put in them - and get compensated for purchases in them. Basically still run the whole show.
--
Apple's logic definitely coincides with their slogan "think different".
 
I don't understand why Apple should be forced to allow third parties to benefit for free from their ecosystem.

If you want to make money off iPhone users, pay Apple their share and then make your money. You can't expect to be allowed to just make money for free.

It's literally like - I build a highway, and then everyone is allowed to collect the toll taxes.
Obviously insane, right? Why would anyone invest in building highways, if they can't benefit from doing that and just anyone is allowed to collect the toll taxes?

 
Yes, it's accurate. Apple has been given less than 30 days to comply with the European Union's Digital Markets Act (DMA) or face additional daily fines.
These rules came into force in 2023, Apple had 60 days... you know what, I'll just post the story here since you were unable to read more than 5 words:
"The law, which took effect in 2023..."
"In April (2025), the European Commission fined Apple €500 million (about $569 million) for these violations and ordered the company to remove the restrictions. Apple was given a 60-day window to comply, with less than a month now remaining before the June 22 deadline. If Apple fails to meet the requirements, the Commission has made it clear it will impose additional periodic fines, which could reach up to five percent of Apple's daily global revenue until compliance is achieved."
I don't understand why Apple should be forced to allow third parties to benefit for free from their ecosystem.
What don't you understand? All other OS's out there (Windows, Linux, even Android) allow you to install whatever you want, what happens if I don't want to use Apple's App store because the App I want to use Apple has randomly decided I can't have it?

Question for you, I assume you're a Windows or MacOS user, how would you feel if suddenly Microsoft decided you cannot install Apps from anywhere other than their app store, and they've decided to ban certain popular apps, like VLC, or Handbrake, because they "are security risks"?
If you want to make money off iPhone users, pay Apple their share and then make your money. You can't expect to be allowed to just make money for free.
1. iPhone users already paid a premium for the hardware, Apple makes good money already
2. No one is saying Apple cannot make money from the App store, what Europe is saying, let users skip Apples store altogether
It's literally like - I build a highway, and then everyone is allowed to collect the toll taxes.
Obviously insane, right? Why would anyone invest in building highways, if they can't benefit from doing that and just anyone is allowed to collect the toll taxes?
Did you read the story? Because based on your description, you didn't read the article.
 
I don't understand why Apple should be forced to allow third parties to benefit for free from their ecosystem.
Because they closed off their ecosystem by only allowing apps to be installed through the app store.
Because they don't allow you to be listed in their app store if you want to offer your own payment option.
Because the EU has designate them as a "gatekeeper" (basically any digital service/platform that grows to be big enough to influence a significant chunk of the population in multiple EU countries).

If you want to make money off iPhone users, pay Apple their share and then make your money. You can't expect to be allowed to just make money for free.
What if Apple isn't really involved? What if you're say Netflix and offer an App that's basically a wrapper around a browser. You could easily shoulder the cost of hosting the app if Apple would let you - but they don't.
You have all the costs of purchasing media rights and hosting these on your servers but now Apple wants a 30% cut. Your market team tells you you'll lose a substantial amount of customers if you start charging 30% more.
Well if you don't use Apple pay then Apple isn't involved and won't need any money right? Wrong - your app gets banned for offering a different payment provider.
Just tell your users to subscribe/pay using their browser in your app instead right? Wrong - now your App is banned from the app store.

It's literally like - I build a highway, and then everyone is allowed to collect the toll taxes.
Obviously insane, right? Why would anyone invest in building highways, if they can't benefit from doing that and just anyone is allowed to collect the toll taxes?
The app store profits are secondary, Apple sells you a phone - that's their profit.
The App store started out as a perk for Apple, people bought an iPhone because as their catchline said "There's an app for that".

Rather than a highway it's more like you buy a market square. No one shows up because you're the only one with a stall and you only sell paintings. Well that's disappointing, so you ask others to set up shop on your market square selling other things and you charge them $99 a year (Apples developers fee).
The increase of things to do (stalls/apps) leads to far more customers for you.
Now you tell everyone that whatever they sell, they should give you 30% of that. They're also not allowed to tell their customers to just go their etsy page to get things 30% cheaper. Oh and your friends with the major who won't give anyone else a permit to run a market so everyone HAS to deal with you.
--
Seems rather anti-consumer/anti-stall owner doesn't it? You're the only one profiting, raking in money for doing not all that much.
 
You know the more you think about the stuff the more I would complete disagreement with Europe on this if you create the product why should you be required to open it up for other people to make money with it? Maybe see other guys want to make money with it maybe they should develop their own platform just an idea.

No I have a great one for Apple what they should do is just simply disable the iOS accounts of every single EU government member until they withdraw their complaint which I'm sure will happen almost immediately.

Just straight up suspender accounts Apple knows who they are and your user agreement for your Apple ID comes with the knowledge that if you upset Apple they have a right to suspend it so I say do it.
 
What don't you understand? All other OS's out there (Windows, Linux, even Android) allow you to install whatever you want, what happens if I don't want to use Apple's App store because the App I want to use Apple has randomly decided I can't have it?
I don't understand what is there to understand.
What other OS's do is a choice of their developers. The developers of any OS are not bound in any way by the choices other developers of other OS's did. Your choice, as a user, is to use a particular OS - as is, or not use it. Not complicated.
Question for you, I assume you're a Windows or MacOS user, how would you feel if suddenly Microsoft decided you cannot install Apps from anywhere other than their app store, and they've decided to ban certain popular apps, like VLC, or Handbrake, because they "are security risks"?
Windows user.
I'd feel bad, I'd curse Microsoft etc. I'd likely switch to Linux. It doesn't matter how I feel - Microsoft could do whatever they like with their OS. If I don't like it that's my problem which I have to solve, Microsoft is not in any way involved.
1. iPhone users already paid a premium for the hardware, Apple makes good money already
2. No one is saying Apple cannot make money from the App store, what Europe is saying, let users skip Apples store altogether
'Apple makes good money already' is not an argument. How should we decide who makes 'good money already'?
What's the procedure to calculate who's making 'good money already'?

'Europe' hasn't contributed even one bit to appStore development.
Why should 'Europe' decide what the developer can / can't do? That's preposterous, 'Europe' is merely a bunch of useless bureaucrats.
 
Back