Apple's latest ad claims Safari is the best browser for privacy

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 586   +13
Staff
A hot potato: No doubt about it, Safari has some strong privacy protections. Notable features include Intelligent Tracking Prevention to block cross-site trackers, built-in privacy reports, and Private Relay, which is available with an iCloud+ subscription and offers enhanced private browsing. This means Apple is not off the mark with its new ad highlighting how strong its privacy is compared to other browsers. But can it really claim it's the best out there?

Apple has released a new video ad targeting the privacy practices of rival web browsers. True to Apple's style, the aesthetics of the ad are striking: it uses imagery of intrusive seagulls with surveillance cameras to symbolize how data firms track users without adequate protection.

While it doesn't name its competitors, Apple implies that other browsers enable user tracking without robust safeguards. Cupertino also highlights its own privacy features, including technologies that prevent cross-site tracking and a private browsing mode that claims to maintain user data confidentiality.

Apple is playing on the perception that Safari does a better job of protecting privacy, and for what it's worth, there is some validity to this argument. Apple is said to be much stricter than Google in terms of privacy requirements for app developers and indeed, Android has been described as more of a "wild west" in terms of app privacy practices. It also tends to implement privacy features by default, such as Intelligent Tracking Prevention in Safari, which blocks cross-site tracking automatically.

Safari emphasizes processing data on the device rather than sending it to servers, which helps minimize data collection, and it has a feature requiring apps to ask a user's permission before tracking their activity across other companies' apps and websites.

Apple also regularly pushes out security updates and collaborates with security researchers to identify and fix vulnerabilities – as do, it must be noted, the other browsers on the market. For example, a previous update, Safari 17.3, addressed a privacy issue related to private browsing activity potentially being visible in Settings. And the most recent update, Safari 17.5, fixed several issues, including preventing websites from persisting permission dialogs after navigation, and addressing potential fingerprinting vulnerabilities.

So, Safari does offer strong privacy protections, but the claim that it's "better" is a nuanced one. For instance, Apple's closed-source nature makes it difficult for independent verification of some privacy claims. And while Safari offers strong privacy features for a mainstream browser, some specialized privacy-focused browsers, like Brave, may offer even more stringent protections. Moreover, Apple does have an ecosystem dependency problem. Namely, some of Safari's privacy features are most effective within Apple's ecosystem, which may limit their usefulness for users of multiple platforms.

Permalink to story:

 
A Firefox spin such as Librewolf or Mullvad Browser are much better for privacy. Tor is also an option if you really need it. Apple just advertises privacy while collecting as much of your data as they can.
 
Definitely not as good as Firefox. And I'm not sure how Brave is doing nowadays.
In all fairness, Safari is a very good browser where privacy is concerned. Sadly it's not available for all platforms. For Linux and Windows there's FireFox(and it's derivatives) and a few security/privacy focused Chromium(not Chrome or Edge) based browsers.
 
In all fairness, Safari is a very good browser where privacy is concerned. Sadly it's not available for all platforms. For Linux and Windows there's FireFox(and it's derivatives) and a few security/privacy focused Chromium(not Chrome or Edge) based browsers.
Safari for me, as a someone who makes websites, is like the new Internet Explorer.
 
Vivaldi, Brave, etc are all based on Chromium, and Chromium calls home to you-know-who.
If you really must (I sometimes do for work) use ungoogled-chromium fork.
 
Safari for me, as a someone who makes websites, is like the new Internet Explorer.
Are you implying that is a good or bad thing?!? Internet Explorer is a universally panned browser. It was something to be avoided at all costs. Are you saying that about Safari?
 
Are you implying that is a good or bad thing?!? Internet Explorer is a universally panned browser. It was something to be avoided at all costs. Are you saying that about Safari?
Bad from a deloper's standpoint. As per usual Apple likes to do things "their way" and you end up with weird problems/bugs. I always have do workarounds/manual fixes for Safari.
 
Safari might make you safe from some people, but do you trust Apple with your information?
Most people do. The iPhone knows everything about us, and it is by far and away the most popular platform. Apple's saving grace is that their business model is not selling data to advertisers. You can't say the same about Google. Certainly I would expect Safari to be better than Google with regard to privacy. Firefox however, are in the same playing field as Apple and wouldn't surprise me if they edged it.
 
Bad from a deloper's standpoint. As per usual Apple likes to do things "their way" and you end up with weird problems/bugs. I always have do workarounds/manual fixes for Safari.
Ah, ok. Context understood.
 
Most people do.
People are mostly ignorant sheep too. I wouldn't and don't. Same with Google & Microsoft. Never trust ANYONE you don't know with your personal data unless there is some legal accountability. Apple, Google, Meta, Microsoft, etc., etc. have no legal accountability. They should therefore NEVER be trusted.
 
Back