Caltech is developing an ultra-thin lens-less camera

Cal Jeffrey

Posts: 4,467   +1,598
Staff member

Smartphone manufacturers continually try to make their devices thinner, even while creeping them progressively closer to tablet size. One obstacle to creating a thinner phone is the camera. The problem with digital cameras is that they require several physical components stacked on top of each other. This pancake configuration makes them bound to a minimum thickness, a fact that smartphone makers have seemingly accepted. However, engineers at Caltech are close to breaking this barrier.

In a paper titled, “An 8x8 Heterodyne Lens-less OPA Camera,” researchers Reza Fatemi, Behrooz Abiri, and Ali Hajimiri detail how a digital camera can be emulated using an ultra-thin arrangement of photosensors. They call the technology an "optical phased array" or OPA.

It works "using a paper-thin layer of low-cost silicon photonics without any mechanical movement, lenses, or mirrors," says Ali Hajimiri, chief engineer on the project.

The OPA is 64 light receivers arranged in an 8x8 array. The system works by phase shifting light using a “tightly controlled time delay.” The timing of the sensors is controlled “with femto-second (quadrillionth of a second) precision.” This precise timing allows the camera to focus on one small piece of the bigger picture. Think of it like several small cameras taking a picture of just a small section of the image, which is a simplification of what is happening.

Hajimiri told Caltech Magazine that the array is not limited to “fish-eye” photography.

“It can mimic a regular lens, but can switch from a fish-eye to a telephoto lens instantaneously—with just a simple adjustment in the way the array receives light.”

Not only does this technology have the potential to further digital camera miniaturization, but it will also reduce the manufacturing costs since no lenses will be required. Coauthor Behrooz Abiri also noted that the technology is not limited to digital photography. He suggests that it may be applied in the development of “ultra-light, ultra-thin enormous flat telescopes on the ground or in space.”

At this time, the OPA is in the very early stages of development. The 8x8 array is only capable of capturing very low-resolution images, but it proves that super-thin lens-less cameras are possible. The team’s next focus will be on increasing the resolution with larger light receivers. With more research and more minds working toward the technology, we could see it being implemented in future phones and wearables.

Permalink to story.

 
Want to build a perfect camera? - ask the nature, I.e. the human eye is as perfect an optical device as it gets.
 
A question that often crosses my mind is: Do consumers really care if their phone is thinner? I know I don't. I would value customisability far more - being able to choose my battery and the consequent thickness of the phone.

Or is it just the designers who think that slim is beautiful?
 
A question that often crosses my mind is: Do consumers really care if their phone is thinner? I know I don't. I would value customisability far more - being able to choose my battery and the consequent thickness of the phone.

Or is it just the designers who think that slim is beautiful?
I agree. We had this discussion on another post a while back. I'd rather have a thicker phone with a longer battery life than these flimsy things they are peddling today. Ain't nothing wrong with a good sturdy phone that you can hold on to.
 
Phones have already reached the smallest practical size. Form-factor will largely remain the same from now on unless the human hand undergoes a very sudden evolution. The biggest benefit of lens-less cameras is distortion-free imaging without need to refocus. That is the idea anyway.
 
A question that often crosses my mind is: Do consumers really care if their phone is thinner? I know I don't. I would value customisability far more - being able to choose my battery and the consequent thickness of the phone.

Or is it just the designers who think that slim is beautiful?
I guess the people do care. This is not a good place to ask since people who visit tech sites don't represent the majority. I would also like bigger batteries and all but your average guy or girl cares mostly about looks cause phones have become a fashion accessory now.
 
I guess the people do care. This is not a good place to ask since people who visit tech sites don't represent the majority. I would also like bigger batteries and all but your average guy or girl cares mostly about looks cause phones have become a fashion accessory now.

What I'm getting at is, it seems as if they do, as you guess, but do they really? Do the phone developers go out there and conduct polls on what people want in phones, or is the drive towards slimness and (easily crackable) wraparound screens something foisted on us by the developers, much like what we get in the fashion industry, where designers have their own agenda and the public just follows because they have no say in the process? I suspect there's a lot of that goes on. I'm pretty sure Microsoft didn't conduct any surveys when they designed the 'tiles' interface for Windows, for example.
 
What I'm getting at is, it seems as if they do, as you guess, but do they really? Do the phone developers go out there and conduct polls on what people want in phones, or is the drive towards slimness and (easily crackable) wraparound screens something foisted on us by the developers, much like what we get in the fashion industry, where designers have their own agenda and the public just follows because they have no say in the process? I suspect there's a lot of that goes on. I'm pretty sure Microsoft didn't conduct any surveys when they designed the 'tiles' interface for Windows, for example.
I can't know for sure buy I'm guessing nobody conducts surveys, they just release the product and see if it sticks hence why when a product takes off everyone else tries to copy it.
 
Back