Cellphone service surpasses that of landlines in US households for the first time

Shawn Knight

Posts: 15,645   +199
Staff member

It may seem difficult for younger readers to fathom but according to a recent survey from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), the number of homes and apartments in the US that only have cellphone service has only recently surpassed those with landline service.

In a survey for the second half of 2016, the CDC found that 50.8 percent of US households only had mobile phone service – up from 48.3 percent in the year-ago period. The survey further notes that 39.4 percent of households have both wireless and traditional phone service while just 6.5 percent relied exclusively on landlines.

Meanwhile, 3.2 percent of homes questioned had no phone connection of any sort.

Stephen J. Blumberg, the study’s co-author, noticed some interesting “commonalities” among those who only have cellular service. Such users are more likely to drink heavily, more likely to smoke and be uninsured, he said, concluding that there certainly is something about giving up a landline that appeals to the same people who may engage in risky behavior.

As the Standard Examiner highlights, landline phones can come in handy when someone misplaces or breaks their mobile device and is waiting for a replacement.

The data comes from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Health Interview Survey which tracks landline use to assure representative samples in health studies, the Standard Examiner notes. Nearly 20,000 households were polled during a six-month span.

Permalink to story.

 
Maybe if the phone companies had bothered to maintain their copper infrastructure over the past thirty years things would be different. Unfortunately the Verizons of the world want out of the actual "line" business completely unless its DSL or fiber, so they have no motivation to keep up the quality of wired service. And wired service has become stupidly expensive, too - you can get unlimited everything on wireless for typically 10-30% less than you can on a neglected landline that sounds like a thunderstorm. Customers have been forced to give up their long-cherished home phones in favor of something that's a lot more affordable and in many cases more reliable as well.
 
Really not that surprising. Many developing Asian countries have little to NO wire service except for the largest cities and usually it is for the elite. Countries like the Philippine's survive and thrive on cell systems and frankly, if they ever come up with a reliable system for desktop computers to go completely wireless from such a system, wired connections will most certainly start phasing out .....
 
Maybe if the phone companies had bothered to maintain their copper infrastructure over the past thirty years things would be different.
This is a dramatic oversimplification, which makes no account of cost to do so. I had all those noises in my line you speak of, and after several unsuccessful attempts to make it look like my fault or imagination, the Verizon tech had to run 400 feet of new cable to correct the issue. Keep in mind you can't run one tiny little wire, but rather an entire trunk cable, encompassing maybe 20 lines, to fix just one.

Unfortunately the Verizons of the world want out of the actual "line" business completely unless its DSL or fiber, so they have no motivation to keep up the quality of wired service.
As I stressed in the last paragraph, it is quite senseless to even try to fix the copper based infrastructure. So, "FIOS" is in essence a "retrofit" repair. If you'll notice, the line cords on appliances and pretty much anything which plugs in keep getting shorter practically by the year. This goes to the availability and cost of metals in general. So, fiber optic line is the sensible and expedient solution

And wired service has become stupidly expensive, too - you can get unlimited everything on wireless for typically 10-30% less than you can on a neglected landline that sounds like a thunderstorm. Customers have been forced to give up their long-cherished home phones in favor of something that's a lot more affordable and in many cases more reliable as well.
Wrong again. Since I'm a bachelor, an orphan, and an only child, I have no need for unlimited phone service to god knows where. That, and pretty much of the running on my mouth is done here at Techspot. With those things said, my "dial tone line" costs $9.00 a month, with certain federal taxes bringing the total closer to $14.00. That is for an optical line, read "FIOS", which is clear as a bell.

The reason everyone's phone service is so damned expensive, is because the youth of today, (and many of the older folk as well), have simply succumbed to inbreeding, and the concomitant inability to simply keep their mouths shut. The more you run your yap, the more you pay, period.

And BTW, "DSL" is copper line transmitted.

Let's recap, shall we? Repairing copper phone lines costs money. Maintaining DSL servers, costs money. Using your logic, Verizon, (or whoever) would be operating two completely separate systems, (copper and optical), covering the same areas. Imagine what that would do to your phone bill.
 
Last edited:
WTH? I thought this happened like 10 years ago? Who the hell still has a landline? Do you also have pagers?
You know, I have to laugh at people like you. You think you're so far ahead of the curve.

If you try to install Windows 7 on a Skylake machine, you'll find so many trendy people in forums whimpering how it won't install.But, if you had one of those "useless" DVD drives, and an "outmoded, ancient" PS-2 keyboard, you'd find it goes right in.

I have a landline, I use it to call 911, maybe order a pizza, and absolutely call toll free numbers so that I can talk to human beings when I spend large sums of money.

But, I don't have a "smartphone", so I won't be able to have that ten buck Starbuck's coffee ready for me when I get there, and I can't download "Candy Crush". Ya got me there, slick. :D
 
I have a landline and no cellphone. So inexpensive compared to cell phones it's incredible and I don't even have to charge it!
 
Back