Confirmed: Microsoft has acquired GitHub

midian182

Posts: 10,660   +142
Staff member
The big picture: Even if you have no interest in programming, you’re likely to know about GitHub, the incredibly popular code repository that’s been described as a social network for developers. Microsoft has confirmed its acquisition of Github in an all-stock deal worth $7.5 billion.

Reports that the two parties have been discussing a potential deal surfaced last week, following years of on-and-off conversations. The pair had recently been talking about a partnership, but this evolved into a discussion about an acquisition. Bloomberg now says that an agreement has finally been reached, though the details won’t emerge until sometime today.

With over 27 million users and 80 million repositories of code, GitHub is the largest host of source code in the world. According to GitHub data, Microsoft is one of the top contributors to the site and has more than 1000 employees adding code to repositories.

Business Insiders reports that GitHub was exploring the option of a potential IPO six months ago, but the company is said to be “impressed” by Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella, who has embraced open-source initiatives during his four years as head of the company. GitHub was last valued at $2 billion in 2015.

Most of the responses to the deal on Twitter and Reddit have been negative, with many people proclaiming it to be the death of GitHub. It seems that rival code repositories such as GitLab and BitBucket might benefit from the acquisition, as some users announce their intention to switch services.

Precisely what the move will mean for GitHub and its users is still unclear. Hopefully, we’ll find out the full details in a few hours.

Permalink to story.

 
...as some users announce their intention to switch services.
Lol, I don't think MS/GitHub will care about these petty users switching. Heck, I bet a lot of these people use MS tech to help develop their software.
 
Most of the responses to the deal on Twitter and Reddit have been negative

Why should this be seen as a positive? Based on their track record with Skype, Nokia, Bungie, Rare, Lionhead, or with their own products.
 
If you're not in the industry you wouldn't understand the dark humor behind this. Basically - github is cool and Microsoft isn't. A lot of programmers love github (for good reason), but think MS is old and buggy.

If you were to ask your average github user what they think of MS they'd probably say 'MS Sucks'. Now they will be using MS.
 
And there's 10x amount of projects exiting GitHub for other services already.
@m4a4
Heck, I bet a lot of these people use MS tech to help develop their software.
ROFL. These kinds of developers NEVER use MS for anything, eg: why use MSFC when just a few lines of native code will do the job, be lean & mean and NEVER need MSFC updates?
 
This is a terrible news. Most of MS acquisitions they managed to screw up badly. I'd hate to see GitHub get broken by MS now.
 
And there's 10x amount of projects exiting GitHub for other services already.
@m4a4
ROFL. These kinds of developers NEVER use MS for anything, eg: why use MSFC when just a few lines of native code will do the job, be lean & mean and NEVER need MSFC updates?
I.. just can't take you seriously.
But I do want to know, do you have any Windows computers that you use, letalone did you use one to post this?
 
@m4a4 OH (sigh). This from Win/7 now; started with Win/xp way back when.
If you see my profile, there's lots of environments in which I have been (gainfully) employed.
Believe it or not, there are other worlds than just MS.
 
@m4a4 from the original permalink story
Most of the responses to the deal on Twitter and Reddit have been negative, with many people proclaiming it to be the death of GitHub. It seems that rival code repositories such as GitLab and BitBucket might benefit from the acquisition, as some users announce their intention to switch services.
 
@m4a4 OH (sigh). This from Win/7 now; started with Win/xp way back when.
If you see my profile, there's lots of environments in which I have been (gainfully) employed.
Believe it or not, there are other worlds than just MS.
Yeah, but that's what I was getting at. I bet a lot of the ones saying they'll switch use stuff from MS (if it's Windows, or Visual Studio, or a programming language).

Best way to compare it is environmentalists that protest against fossil fuel. They use their cars to get there, wearing their (rubber) shoes and (some of them) polyester clothing, picketing with their (probably) plastic signs. It's just amusing, that's all.
 
Yeah, but that's what I was getting at. I bet a lot of the ones saying they'll switch use stuff from MS (if it's Windows, or Visual Studio, or a programming language).
NO ONE uses Visual Studio for web programming.

You asked me if I use Windows - - I'll ask you have you every used anything other than MS?
 
NO ONE uses Visual Studio for web programming.
You asked me if I use Windows - - I'll ask you have you every used anything other than MS?
GitHub is not just for web programming. Why are you suggesting otherwise?

And you'll have to be more specific. Because otherwise the answer is "yes" lol
 
@m4a4 First, apologies: I mistook Visual Studio for something else. VS is
Visual Studio Code is a source code editor developed by Microsoft for Windows, Linux and macOS. It includes support for debugging, embedded Git control, syntax highlighting, intelligent code completion, snippets, and code refactoring. It is also customizable, so users can change the editor's theme, keyboard shortcuts, and preferences. It is free and open-source,[7][8] although the official download is under a proprietary license.[6]

Visual Studio Code is based on Electron, a framework which is used to deploy Node.js applications for the desktop running on the Blink layout engine. Although it uses the Electron framework,[9] the software does not use Atom and instead employs the same editor component (codenamed "Monaco") used in Visual Studio Team Services (formerly called Visual Studio Online).
So VS is an SDK, (not a run time environment) and supports
not all of which are portable to other platforms or webservers. To each his own -- if it works for you then that's just fine.
Some of the above are native system commands in Linux {Less, Diff, Makefile, ... } and some are purely MS only {INI, Powershell, ...}

GitHub is not just for web programming. Why are you suggesting otherwise?
Didn't; GitHub is a CMS for code collaboration via a central site. Open Projects frequently use a CMS (and GitHub is not the sole player). As I said, I mistook your Visual Studio for an RTE -- my bad.

Obviously my interest is web programming (specifically mobile device support beyond Responsive CSS) and platform independence. SDKs are a performance improvement but also an entrapment to a programming environment with subsequent dependencies.​

 
NO ONE uses Visual Studio for web programming.

You asked me if I use Windows - - I'll ask you have you every used anything other than MS?

There are far too many people who use MS products because that is part of their job. I often wonder if IBM's top management would have done instead of using PC-DOS (aka MS-DOS) as the OS that shipped with the original IBM PCs, if they had 20/20 foresight regarding the state of the computer and networking industries just ten years later.

The effective monopoly that Microsoft has maintained (despite the slap on the wrist it was given when it settled the antitrust case against it by the FTC) is very similar to the dominant position that IBM kept in the mainframe computing industry for years after IBM shot itself in the foot by legitimizing the desktop computer as a serious product in 1981.

It remains to be seen if Android-based devices cause Microsoft to do more than stick a big toe into the open source code OS marketplace. It is very difficult to break up a corporation that has become too essential to fail because of its proprietary hold on certain technologies that quickly became the industry defaults.

Think of how different the entire world would be if MS had to release the source code to all of its existing OS products back in 1998. It is tough to decide if/when a company is stifling progress by use of patent and copyright law or helping new industries grow by setting some standards that involve its legally protected proprietary technology.
 
Nadella hardly screwed anything since he came into power at MS. Microsoft is flourishing under his management.
LOL. You haven't been following along with the string of failures Nadella's incompetence & mismanagement have been responsible for.
 
LOL. You haven't been following along with the string of failures Nadella's incompetence & mismanagement have been responsible for.
Please, point some evidence to me. And it better be good, because despite these claimed "failures" Microsoft's revenue and market value has been steadily rising for quite some time.
 
Back