Cyborg cockroach armies can now be mass-produced at a rate of one every 68 seconds

zohaibahd

Posts: 934   +19
Staff
Roaches assemble: Cockroaches are some of the most resilient creatures on the planet, making them an excellent tool for operations where humans simply wouldn't fit. However, the biggest challenge has been taming these tiny beasts. While researchers have achieved limited success in the past, a new method now not only promises to turn cockroaches into cyborgs but also does it at scale.

A team of researchers in Singapore's Nanyang Technological University has unveiled a novel manufacturing process that can mass-produce cyborg insects by automatically implanting electronic backpacks onto live bugs. The system is so efficient that it can crank out a cyborg cockroach once every 68 seconds. That's a huge step up from previous efforts that required manual implantation of electrodes, which was painfully slow work given the delicate anatomy of bugs.

The system starts by anesthetizing some (unlucky) roaches with carbon dioxide. These incapacitated insects are then secured to a platform by metal rods. From there, a robot equipped with computer vision and deep learning scans each bug to identify optimal implantation points based on its particular size and body structure.

Using a robotic arm, a compact microcontroller is then carefully affixed to the roach. Specialized mounting branches help keep the backpack stable and secure. Once implanted, the backpack's electrodes can electrically stimulate the bug's neurons to control its movements.

The team says that they put their manufacturing process through extensive testing on Madagascar hissing cockroaches, which is one of the largest species of the bug and can reach 5 to 7.5 centimeters at maturity. The results showed that these cyborgs performed just as well as their manually-implanted predecessors when commanded to turn, decelerate, and navigate obstacle courses.

In outdoor trials, a squad of four cyborg roaches equipped with location trackers managed to collectively map 80% of a cluttered 4-square-meter area within 10 minutes – all while being remotely driven by their electronic backpacks.

The researchers state that this breakthrough paves the way for full-fledged "factories" that could mass-produce armies of insect cyborgs on demand to serve a variety of applications across different industries. Search and rescue in collapsed buildings and underground operations are two obvious use cases. But they also envision enhanced models with additional sensors for specialized inspections, environmental monitoring, and who knows what else.

The big remaining challenge is enabling these cyborgs to operate autonomously rather than being remote-controlled. If that can be achieved, the researchers claim hundreds of such robots could be operated simultaneously for more expansive missions.

The full findings can be found in a yet-to-be-peer-reviewed study published on the arXiv preprint server.

Permalink to story:

 
Cyborg cockroach armies can now be mass-produced at a rate of one every 68 seconds
That's very slow, considering that cockroaches thremselves can produce thousands off-springs during the same time. At least in Florida all evidence points to that.
 
Well it could be remotelly controlled as a swarm just like drones.
And 68/sec may not be much now but it's a prototype. Imagine if they make a way to put a small charge of whatever on a swarm of 1 million cockroaches and make it converge to a point... It can affect industrial and military installations, destroy militar equipament and so on...

Creep, but Interesting...


 
This is how they solve the limited battery issue for drones. How long till their doing this to monkeys?
 
Its still cruelty, whether to a cockroach or a monkey. How long before some bright nerd suggests using the less intelligent in our community?
 
Why is this good???
Humanity can now achieve incredible feats as this, yet millions' of people are hungry ever year. Technology os only pushing one thing forward - human suffering through wars and other misery
 
Humanity can now achieve incredible feats as this, yet millions' of people are hungry ever year. Technology os only pushing one thing forward - human suffering through wars and other misery
Was your post a joke? Before technology, essentially all of humanity was on the brink of starvation, with a substantial percentage dying from hunger every year. As recently as 100 years ago, many primitive peoples still viewed obesity as a symbol of wealth and power -- because if you weren't rich, you were rail-thin from lack of food. In 16th Century Japan, the average male was only 155 cm high, due to stunting from lack of food, and by 1935, the average was still only 162cm. Today, it's 172cm -- thanks to technology.
 
Was your post a joke? Before technology, essentially all of humanity was on the brink of starvation, with a substantial percentage dying from hunger every year. As recently as 100 years ago, many primitive peoples still viewed obesity as a symbol of wealth and power -- because if you weren't rich, you were rail-thin from lack of food. In 16th Century Japan, the average male was only 155 cm high, due to stunting from lack of food, and by 1935, the average was still only 162cm. Today, it's 172cm -- thanks to technology.
No, you missed the point mate.
Yes, what you say is true. Technology helped us, but we have now reached a stage where technology only helps the supper rich and its only being used to fuel greed.
Technology now makes our food poison, our environment polluted and destroyed… its all downhill now… robots AI nothing we actually meed.
Technology is progressing at incredible speed yet everything is now super expensive and unaffordable. Wars everywhere… genocides…
Humanity peeked at around 2000… the future is grim
 
Technology helped us, but we have now reached a stage where technology only helps the supper [sic] rich and its [sic] only being used to fuel greed.
Utter nonsense. Do you have any idea how many new medical treatments have been developed in the last 10 years alone?
Technology now makes our food poison, our environment polluted and destroyed…
And yet access to clean food, air, and water is today greater than at any point in human history. And human life expectancy is still growing globallyat an average rate of 2.5% per decade -- thanks to technology.
its all downhill now… robots AI nothing we actually meed. [sic] Wars everywhere… genocides…Humanity peeked [sic] at around 2000
I don't imagine those living in the 18th century felt they needed electricity, wireless communication, or personal computing devices either. Get a little vision.

And "wars and genocide" were far, far more prevalent in centuries past than they are today. Learn history.
 
And "wars and genocide" were far, far more prevalent in centuries past than they are today. Learn history.
(Google AI)
"According to estimates, World War II resulted in between 50 and 85 million casualties, with the majority being civilians, primarily in the Soviet Union and China; this makes it the deadliest conflict in human history".

If you want to count the 20th century as "centuries past", then you can proudly can claim yourself "correct". But, that war ended in 1945, somewhere in the vicinity of 80 years ago, (BTW) 80 years does not equal a century.
The Vietnam war and a series of Indo-China wars


The war in Afghanistan. Figure that out yourself.

The current conflict in Ukraine. Estimated casualties in excess of a million. (Or is that a "special military action", and not really a "war").

Israel vs. various ruling and/or terrorist organizations 40,000+ in civilians alone. (If we're to believe statistics presented by Hamas).

You should ask to borrow @Zsoltblabla history book's and newspapers when he's done with them.


You know what I always say, "you can lead a horse to a needle full of horse, but you can't make him stick it in his are".
 
Its still cruelty, whether to a cockroach or a monkey. How long before some bright nerd suggests using the less intelligent in our community?
Ok good point, but that will only affect the red states!

949b92e65ae4a8c4b6e43ad406e671f6.gif
 
(Google AI)
"According to estimates, World War II resulted in between 50 and 85 million casualties
Oops! As a percentage killed of those involved, WWII isn't on the top 10, nor even the top 100 worst conflicts in history. Take the battle of Cannae in the Second Punic Wars, where nearly 90% of the Roman army of 86,000 men died. In just one day. Rome recruited another army and fought on for 14 more years, eventually destroying the Carthaginian people entirely -- every last man, woman, and child. Carthago Delenda Est.

There are records of the Golden Horde of the Mongols taking cities with populations of a million plus, marching out every single resident and beheading them -- save, of course, for a few tasty virgins taken for a lifetime of sexual slavery. The Golden Horde killed some 50 million people -- out of a world population of only 350 million. Or how about the Taiping Rebellion in the mid 1800s, which killed some 30 million in just one single country alone.

The historical list of indigenous peoples and tribes which no longer exist spans hundreds of pages. In ancient times, "war" didn't mean besting your opponent's military and signing a peace treaty. It meant killing every single man and boy on the other side, then enslaving the women and infants.

The current conflict in Ukraine. Estimated casualties in excess of a million.
You're confused. A military "casualty" is not a death. Total killed in the Ukrainian conflict are likely around 1/5 that figure.
 
Oops! As a percentage killed of those involved, WWII isn't on the top 10, nor even the top 100 worst conflicts in history. Take the battle of Cannae in the Second Punic Wars, where nearly 90% of the Roman army of 86,000 men died. In just one day. Rome recruited another army and fought on for 14 more years, eventually destroying the Carthaginian people entirely -- every last man, woman, and child. Carthago Delenda Est.
Take it up it up with Google AI:

"According to most estimates, World War II resulted in between 50 and 85 million deaths, making it the deadliest conflict in human history; with the majority of casualties being civilians.

So no, I'm not confused, you are.
 
Back