Despite tech-savvy reputation, Gen Z falls behind in keyboard typing skills

zohaibahd

Posts: 934   +19
Staff
The big picture: Gen Z, often considered digital natives, grew up glued to screens. However, their mastery has its limits – particularly with the humble physical keyboard, which seems as foreign to them as the possibility of getting scammed online does to boomers.

A recent Wall Street Journal report delves into Gen Z's surprising lack of keyboard typing skills, featuring interviews with several individuals and revealing some startling statistics.

The report cited data from the US Department of Education, showing that in 2000, a staggering 44 percent of high school graduates took a keyboarding course. By 2019, that number had plummeted to just 2.5 percent. One might assume this is because Gen Z is so adept at typing that formal instruction seems unnecessary. Unfortunately, the reality is quite the opposite.

Christine Mueller, a former tech educator in Oklahoma City, witnessed this phenomenon firsthand. While the school district provided laptops to students, it did not teach them how to type efficiently. In response, she organized the city's first "Key Bee" – a spelling bee-style competition designed to encourage typing practice.

The results were eye-opening. The fastest student reached an impressive 91 words per minute, while the average fourth grader's speed improved from a sluggish 13 words per minute to 25 words per minute.

As for why Gen Z struggles with typing despite their tech-savvy reputation, a survey from the Pew Research Center suggests that many educators assume students naturally pick up typing skills through constant device usage.

Many students have embraced tablets and mobile devices over physical keyboards. Paige DeChaney, an 18-year-old from Illinois, wrote an eight-page memoir entirely on her iPad, skillfully using the on-screen keyboard. She admits she's "gotten weird looks for typing on my iPad screen."

The data supports this shift. Between March and May 2024, 39 percent of assignments submitted through the online education platform Canvas came from mobile devices.

Another trend highlighted in the report is students watching their hands as they type to ensure accuracy, indicating a lack of keyboard confidence.

As states transition standardized tests to computer-based exams, the report emphasizes that students with better typing skills can score higher since they can focus more on the test content rather than the keyboard.

Perhaps this is why there are signs of renewed interest in formal typing instruction. Tim Dikun, COO of Teaching.com, the parent company of Typing.com, has observed a surge in demand for typing curricula from states like New York and Texas due to their shift to computer-based testing.

However, if you're Gen Z, formal training isn't absolutely necessary – earlier research found that self-taught typists who use an average of six fingers are just as fast as professionals using all 10. So, with a bit of practice, you can improve your typing skills on your own.

Image credit: Vlad Deep, Pixabay

Permalink to story:

 
It is simple: while being labelled tech-savvy, Gen-Z is just consuming rather than savvy. While the economy would need creators, they got consumers. Everyone knows how this will turn out...

Exactly. Gen Z is not producing anything, just consuming. Making phones without physical keyboard illegal would be good first step. But as usual, that kind of good thing probably won't happen.
 
Isn't it just something you are good with if you do it a lot.
I tried to become a pro several times. But I never really needed it.
therefore, I went back to my primitive slow technique.
I am guessing with more advanced voice to text apps,
people would only become less skilled in typing.

And since we are speaking about typing, what about ability to write
without spellcheck? Things might be much worse in this area.
 
Oh well, make it a contest to type on a cellphone instead of on a regular computer keyboard, where they cannot use their thumbs and watch them speed up to 300 characters per minute.
 
The problem is most people are used to texting instead.

Personally, you can pry my Desktop from my cold dead hands, but I've *never* been good with touch typing. There's other ways that may not be *as* fast, but at least aren't slow.
 
"Generation Z, also known as Zoomers, is shockingly bad at touch typing"

vs.

"their mastery has its limits – particularly with the humble physical keyboard"
 
you probably grew up using a laptop or desktop, a lot of other Gen Z just grew up with tablets/smartphones and watching TV
Literally all of gen Z went to school for, bare minimum, 13 years. All those schools are full fo desktops, laptops, and chromebooks, all with full keyboards. there is no excuse. Frankly, most people SUCK at using computers, this is just general fact no matter what generation you are talking about.
 
As a representative of a generation X, I would say that I wasnt good at typing too in the same time frame of my life, as is generation Z at the moment :D
 
Stating the obvious. People stopped taking typing lessons and, to make it even worse, thousands of schools don't even teach cursive writing anymore because fine motor skills are, as they claim, "outdated".
 
Stating the obvious. People stopped taking typing lessons and, to make it even worse, thousands of schools don't even teach cursive writing anymore because fine motor skills are, as they claim, "outdated".
Fine motor skills are not outdated. Cursive is. It utterly failed at what it was designed for (making a universally readable text) because someone with messy handwriting, it turns out, writes messy cursive. Digital word processors and omnipresent computers have made that need completely obsolete. And if you dont have great fine motor skills, getting cursive forced upon you just makes you utterly HATE the education system (hi, thats me) for forcing you to do something that has no use and doesnt matter.

When's the last time you even used it? I havent legit written cursive since high school. Nobody does it anymore. It goes alongside the casette tape and vaccum lines as "tech that belongs in the past and was never very good".
 
Fine motor skills are not outdated. Cursive is. It utterly failed at what it was designed for (making a universally readable text) because someone with messy handwriting, it turns out, writes messy cursive. Digital word processors and omnipresent computers have made that need completely obsolete. And if you dont have great fine motor skills, getting cursive forced upon you just makes you utterly HATE the education system (hi, thats me) for forcing you to do something that has no use and doesnt matter.

When's the last time you even used it? I havent legit written cursive since high school. Nobody does it anymore. It goes alongside the casette tape and vaccum lines as "tech that belongs in the past and was never very good".

Cursive was less about making text legible and more about teaching people to write faster by not lifting the pen at every letter.

And you miss the point entirely on "forcing you to do something that has no use or doesn't matter." Kids say that about arithmetic and literature because they have been brainwashed into thinking that something doesn't matter unless it generates a profit. Nonsense. Arithmetic, literature, how to use a computer, etc. are all skills that are inherently enriching regardless of their practical use.

We need to foster a culture of learning for the sake of learning rather than one where the value of something is determined by how "useful" it is because that is how you create society where nobody bothers to think about anything.
 
"Stupid is as stupid does" - Forest,,,, Forest Gump (well sorta)

The issue here is that Gen Z'ers completely skipped real typing lessons & proceeded to only use just enough keys to play the latest game or message someone....which does NOT constitute actually composing anything worthy of being read by others, which god forbid, requires logic, critical thinking and reasoning skills, things most of them have absolutely NO idea about.

Only the small minority that actually learned (or were taught) how to actually USE a computer, which BTW involves way more than merely typing out some random characters on a screen, are the ones who will be able to succeed later in life....

This is why I did not allow my kids to do any school work whatsoever on their computers until they proved to me that they could do it on paper first, as well as set strict time goals for both tasks, and limited their free time use of any tech before & after school...

Yea it was hard, but nobody said parenting would be easy !

And FYI, they both breezed thru both undergrad & post-UG degrees, one is now a lawyer & the other has recently launched his own Engineering firm....
 
I am a "Gen Z'er" myself, and I believe this typing issue is just one facet of our generation. Yes, it’s quite alarming that the so-called "tech-savvy" generation is struggling with such a basic skill. But you know what? This actually shines a light on some interesting traits that define us as a generation.

One thing I have observed is that we tend to be quick to adopt anything that captivates us. It's all about what grabs our attention and feels useful right now. We live in a time with so many options, and our choices often come down to what's most efficient or exciting in the moment. Typing? Well, it’s not exactly as flashy as the ChatGPT craze, that trending GIF or emoji app, or the latest Snapchat AI filter everyone’s raving about. We can express our thoughts and emotions with just a few taps, and honestly, that’s where the excitement lies!

Okay, I know that’s mostly social media, but I mean, if an AI can generate 85% to 95% of a report that would take me hours to type out, I'd definitely drift toward that more convenient option. Even as software developers, we're writing less and less code with all these no-code and low-code tools popping up —the likes of Bubble, Adalo, Softr, Flutterflow, Glide, etc

And not to say AI is the enemy—it has its drawbacks for sure. For one, I feel it's crippling our creativity and originality in some ways, so we definitely need to use it as a tool, not a crutch. But my point is, this whole conversation could be a matter of perception.

Maybe it's not such a bad thing that we're finding more efficient ways to solve real-life problems with less typing. (That's for those actually making some difference in the world with today's tech!)

The real question is how to balance it all. We need to adapt and evolve. Technology should be a tool to better our lives and make processes more efficient, right?

I am also a developing writer though, and I have to point out that there's just something that happens in your mind when you write, whether it's typing or handwriting. It changes the way you think and can even enhance your cognitive abilities. So yeah, I agree we still need to work on our typing skills and continue building a writing culture (Though, learning could definitely be made cooler with some gamification aspects —just saying).

But it's not just about typing faster. It's about understanding when to use what tool. Sometimes you need to type out a long essay to really get your thoughts straight. Other times, you can use AI to help you brainstorm, proofread, or just get work done faster. It's all about finding that balance between old-school skills and new-school tools.
 
I am a "Gen Z'er" myself, and I believe this typing issue is just one facet of our generation. Yes, it’s quite alarming that the so-called "tech-savvy" generation is struggling with such a basic skill. But you know what? This actually shines a light on some interesting traits that define us as a generation.

One thing I have observed is that we tend to be quick to adopt anything that captivates us. It's all about what grabs our attention and feels useful right now. We live in a time with so many options, and our choices often come down to what's most efficient or exciting in the moment. Typing? Well, it’s not exactly as flashy as the ChatGPT craze, that trending GIF or emoji app, or the latest Snapchat AI filter everyone’s raving about. We can express our thoughts and emotions with just a few taps, and honestly, that’s where the excitement lies!

Okay, I know that’s mostly social media, but I mean, if an AI can generate 85% to 95% of a report that would take me hours to type out, I'd definitely drift toward that more convenient option. Even as software developers, we're writing less and less code with all these no-code and low-code tools popping up —the likes of Bubble, Adalo, Softr, Flutterflow, Glide, etc

And not to say AI is the enemy—it has its drawbacks for sure. For one, I feel it's crippling our creativity and originality in some ways, so we definitely need to use it as a tool, not a crutch. But my point is, this whole conversation could be a matter of perception.

Maybe it's not such a bad thing that we're finding more efficient ways to solve real-life problems with less typing. (That's for those actually making some difference in the world with today's tech!)

The real question is how to balance it all. We need to adapt and evolve. Technology should be a tool to better our lives and make processes more efficient, right?

I am also a developing writer though, and I have to point out that there's just something that happens in your mind when you write, whether it's typing or handwriting. It changes the way you think and can even enhance your cognitive abilities. So yeah, I agree we still need to work on our typing skills and continue building a writing culture (Though, learning could definitely be made cooler with some gamification aspects —just saying).

But it's not just about typing faster. It's about understanding when to use what tool. Sometimes you need to type out a long essay to really get your thoughts straight. Other times, you can use AI to help you brainstorm, proofread, or just get work done faster. It's all about finding that balance between old-school skills and new-school tools.

You already alluded to the point that is often missed among the pro AI people who are positive about the way ChatGPT is being used by students on their writing assignments; AI bros think that writing is a purely physical activity when it is very much not.

Writing is a mental exercise much more than it is a physical one. Coming up with a premise, developing arguments, considering counter arguments, and putting it all together with effective sentence structure and vocabulary is all an intense mental exercise that makes writing an inherently enriching experience regardless of the "real world value". This is why we should all be knowledgeable in effective writing skills because that tends to correlate with better thinking: involved writing requires a certain level of self reflection. The value of writing as an activity should and must never be tied exclusively to its ability to generate profit.

That same attitude that deems it alright for AI to replace human writing is the same attitude that will argue for defunding history, literature, and other fine arts colleges in favor of putting all the money in STEM because "STEM has real world applications." And that's the problem: trying to replace a human activity like writing without understanding its inherent value.

You might say that "people said the same about calculators and other tech when it was new" but I will point out that I believe that calculators have indeed made people worse at basic arithmetic (the amount of times I have seen adults use one to do some really basic calculations is too much for me to write this off as anecdotal); the same way I think social media has had a destructive affect on people's patience with one another.

Writing, creative, argumentative, academic, or what have you is an inherently enriching activity that humans have engaged in for much of their history and it should by all means be preserved as such.
 
If u need typing lessons, you probably have a new job that required it, or you dont have self esteem
 
Back