Google defends failing AI search, while promising improvements

Daniel Sims

Posts: 1,883   +49
Staff
Facepalm: Google's new AI Overviews feature started hallucinating from day one, and more flawed – often hilariously so – results began appearing on social media in the days since. While the company recently tried to explain why such errors occur, it remains to be seen whether a large language model (LLM) can ever truly overcome generative AI's fundamental weaknesses, although we've seen OpenAI's models do significantly better than this.

Google has outlined some tweaks planned for the search engine's new AI Overviews, which immediately faced online ridicule following its launch. Despite inherent problems with generative AI that tech giants have yet to fix, Google intends to stay the course with AI-powered search results.

The new feature, introduced earlier this month, aims to answer users' complex queries by automatically summarizing text from relevant hits (which most website publishers are simply calling "stolen content"). But many people immediately found that the tool can deliver profoundly wrong answers, which quickly spread online.

Google has offered multiple explanations behind the glitches. The company claims that some of the examples posted online are fake. Still, others stem from issues such as nonsensical questions, lack of solid information, or the AI's inability to detect sarcasm and satire. Rushing to the market with an unfinished product was the obvious explanation not offered by Google though.

Rushing to the market with an unfinished product was the obvious explanation not offered by Google though.

For example, in one of the most widely shared hallucinations, the search engine suggests users should eat rocks. Because virtually no one would seriously ask that question, the only strong result on the subject that the search engine could find was an article originating from the satire website The Onion suggesting that eating rocks is healthy. The AI attempts to build a coherent response no matter what it digs up, resulting in absurd output.

The company is trying to fix the problem by improving the restrictions on what the search engine will answer and where it pulls information. It should begin avoiding spoof sources and user-generated content, and won't generate AI responses to ridiculous queries.

Google's explanation might explain some user complaints, but plenty of cases shared on social media show the search engine failing to answer perfectly rational questions correctly. The company claims that the humiliating examples spread online represent a loud minority. This may be a fair point, as users rarely discuss a tool when it works properly, although we've seen plenty of those success stories spreading online due to the novelty behind genAI and tools like ChatGPT.

Google has reiterated its claim that AI Overviews drive more clicks toward websites despite claims that reprinting information in the search results drives traffic away from its source. The company said that users who find a page through AI Overviews tend to stay there longer, calling the clicks "higher quality." Third-party web traffic metrics will likely need to test Google's assertions.

Permalink to story:

 
I asked Gemini to find me cheap SATA SSD with DRAM other than Samsung and Crucial . Here s an extraction of the chat

Gemini - "Yes, there are definitely some cheaper options for DRAM SATA SSDs besides Samsung and Crucial. Here are a couple of brands to consider:

Teamgroup:
Teamgroup offers several DRAM-based SATA SSD options with good value propositions. Here are two to look at:
Team Group GX2 Series: This series offers a balance of performance and affordability. Speeds can reach up to 560/510 MB/s for reads/writes. It comes with a 3-year warranty.
Team Group Delta MAX Series:This series focuses on higher endurance with a focus on professional use. Speeds are similar to the GX2 Series, but it boasts a longer warranty (5 years).
...
Kingston:
Kingston is another reputable brand with a variety of DRAM SATA SSD options. Here's one to consider:
Kingston A400:This is a budget-friendly option with decent performance. Speeds are around 500/450 MB/s for reads/writes. It comes with a 3-year warranty."

me - "A400 is dramless as far as I know"

Gemini - "You're absolutely right, I apologize for the mistake. The Kingston A400 does not have DRAM cache."

So Gemini proposed also ADATA Ultimate SU650 . But they are DRAMless as well .
 
Both Gemini and Copilot are excessively verbose. I asked a yes/no question when multiple paragraphs began appearing. I stopped it and replied "That was a yes/no question". It immediately apologized and said the answer was no.
What a terrible use of resources.
 
The only way to train an AI is through time and data… you can’t release a “polished” version immediately.

Plenty are laughing now, but give this a few years and you’ll probably forget there was ever another way to search.
 
I asked Gemini to find me cheap SATA SSD with DRAM other than Samsung and Crucial . Here s an extraction of the chat

Gemini - "Yes, there are definitely some cheaper options for DRAM SATA SSDs besides Samsung and Crucial. Here are a couple of brands to consider:

Teamgroup:
Teamgroup offers several DRAM-based SATA SSD options with good value propositions. Here are two to look at:
Team Group GX2 Series: This series offers a balance of performance and affordability. Speeds can reach up to 560/510 MB/s for reads/writes. It comes with a 3-year warranty.
Team Group Delta MAX Series:This series focuses on higher endurance with a focus on professional use. Speeds are similar to the GX2 Series, but it boasts a longer warranty (5 years).
...
Kingston:
Kingston is another reputable brand with a variety of DRAM SATA SSD options. Here's one to consider:
Kingston A400:This is a budget-friendly option with decent performance. Speeds are around 500/450 MB/s for reads/writes. It comes with a 3-year warranty."

me - "A400 is dramless as far as I know"

Gemini - "You're absolutely right, I apologize for the mistake. The Kingston A400 does not have DRAM cache."

So Gemini proposed also ADATA Ultimate SU650 . But they are DRAMless as well .

Never ask generative AI a question to which you need a factual answer. It’s a LLM’s are a statistics framework, and the ‘statistically correct’ answer just isn’t always the right one. And this can’t be fixed.
 
Both Gemini and Copilot are excessively verbose. I asked a yes/no question when multiple paragraphs began appearing. I stopped it and replied "That was a yes/no question". It immediately apologized and said the answer was no.
What a terrible use of resources.

This happens because answers to questions are statistically likely to include large parts of the questions. It’s a basic part of gen A.I.’s fake it till you make it stratagem.
 
The only way to train an AI is through time and data… you can’t release a “polished” version immediately.

Plenty are laughing now, but give this a few years and you’ll probably forget there was ever another way to search.
Well, co-pilot is built on chatGPT, which has been around for awhile and has scraped decades worth of data, and it still cant answer a basic question without mouthing off like an insecure MBA.

Turns out AI might just suck.
 
Well, co-pilot is built on chatGPT, which has been around for awhile and has scraped decades worth of data, and it still cant answer a basic question without mouthing off like an insecure MBA.

Turns out AI might just suck.
It hasn’t been around for very long - ChatGPT isn’t even 10 years old yet…

Tech takes awhile to mature… given another decade, I suspect that AI will be vastly superior to what we have now.
 
Back