Intel mulls splitting divisions as financial woes continue

Cal Jeffrey

Posts: 4,452   +1,588
Staff member
In a nutshell: Intel is actively seeking advice from investment bankers after a recent troubling earnings report. The company is having difficulty navigating what insiders say is the most challenging time in Intel's 56-year history. Company heads are considering options, which include potentially separating its product design and manufacturing divisions.

Intel is in the early stages of talks with its longtime financial advisors, Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs Group. Everything seems to be on the table, including cuts to capital expenditures and canceling some factory projects. The company is even looking into mergers and acquisitions.

The crisis came after a shameful earnings report earlier this month that sent Intel stock tumbling to its lowest point since 2013. Shares were briefly surging, up 6.5 percent earlier this year, but plummeted 60 percent since then. It was a hard pill to swallow for shareholders, considering that the industry benchmark, the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index, had gained 20 percent at the time of the report.

Intel posted a net loss of $1.61 billion in the last quarter. Analysts predict more shortfalls are to come before year's end. Asymmetric Advisors Market Strategist Amir Anvarzadeh told Bloomberg that Intel's business model is "effectively broken." He expects substantial capital expenditure cuts over the next 12 months.

Also read: Intel's rough quarter was expected, but management's messaging struggles were not

"Expect big capex cuts from Intel over the next 12 months," said Anvarzadeh. "Intel's model is effectively broken. It's fighting fires on too many fronts."

The company will formulate a plan in the next few weeks and present it to its board of directors before the end of September. Deciding to split its design and manufacturing arms will take the wind out of CEO Pat Gelsinger's sails to see the company as a leading competitor to mega chip manufacturer TSMC.

Gelsinger returned to Intel in 2021, promising to revive the company to its former glory, putting him under intense pressure to deliver. He planned to expand the company's manufacturing footprint, but declining sales hampered progress. Intel recently announced it intends to cut around 15,000 jobs. It also wants to cut spending and suspend dividends, which will not likely please shareholders.

Adding to Intel's troubles, director Lip-Bu Tan, a crucial member of the company's turnaround efforts, stepped down last week. His resignation further complicates the company's efforts at a comeback. With Intel now kicked out of the top 10 largest chipmakers by market value and facing stiff competition from rivals like Nvidia, the road ahead for Gelsinger and his team looks increasingly shaky.

Gelsinger's plans to make manufacturing a cornerstone of Intel's comeback strategy are likely dashed. At the very least, the company will relegate them to the back burner in favor of a more conservative approach.

Permalink to story:

 
Im not sure Octa Core Pro (2MwOn 16nm)
or watching ARMs and making efficient cores
amd is just busy to make the things going as they need to be
 
Meanwhile, no matter what happens, Gelsinger and his ilk, along with the banks, will secure ostentatious remuneration for a "job well done" or "crisis averted," while thousands of rank-and-file employees will get kicked to the curb for following their "wise" leadership.
 
I think when Raja and ATI graphics group joined intel; everything started to fall apart. Intel had lots of capital when they were making CPUs only. As soon as they went into desktop GPU section, they started to lose and fall behind. Of course Intel did also sit down for 11 years without innovating and charging $1200 for their extreme lineups. AMD comeback literally eradicated their monopoly. Now they either adapt and innovate or get the fuk out. For competition sake, I hope they do rebound.
 
No, you don't. That would increase prices and reduce innovation in all the sectors in which Intel competes.
What innovation are you talking about? Intel hasn't been innovating anything in the consumer market for about a decade now.
Besides, there are other chipmakers who could fit into Intel's current market position.
 
What innovation are you talking about? Intel hasn't been innovating anything in the consumer market for about a decade now.
Besides, there are other chipmakers who could fit into Intel's current market position.
First of all, the more competition you have in any market, the better. That's Econ 101. You'll have more innovation than otherwise, and prices will remain lower because there will be more supply, and the battle for market share will incentivize price wars between competitors.

And yes, Intel's presence has been fostering innovation. Maybe not as much as we would like. Innovation doesn't have to come from Intel only but also from its competitors. Intel's mere presence in a market spurs more innovation than we would have if Intel did not exist in said market.

Because of Intel's leadership in the CPU market, even though it's been complacently resting on its laurels, AMD has been innovating to catch up. Hence, the Ryzen CPU series, with its 3D V cache variants, among other things. And the only way AMD will continue to innovate in the market is if Intel continues in it.

Intel's foray into the GPU market has been nipping at AMD's heels, yielding Intel's own XeSS, which has been superior to AMD's FSR, and forcing AMD to do better than it otherwise might have. It appears that AMD has been giving up catching up to Nvidia, settling for Nvidia's market scraps. But Intel's entry into the market might encourage AMD to try harder.

Intel's foray into the radio module market, disappointing as it was, kept Qualcomm and Mediatek innovating more than otherwise to remain ahead. And this is just the surface stuff.

If Intel succeeds in its chip fab endeavors, it will mean more availability and lower prices for everyone. Not to mention even more innovation from TSMC, Samsung, etc.
 
Back