Intel wants more modular laptops, but the focus is on OEMs, not consumers

Daniel Sims

Posts: 1,876   +49
Staff
Why it matters: A few companies are trying to make laptops as customizable as desktops, allowing users to swap individual components without replacing the entire system. Intel recently signaled its support for the concept, but recent comments indicate the company is primarily interested in helping vendors provide more options.

According to PCWorld, Intel India president Gokul Subramaniam recently elaborated on the company's proposed modular laptop standards. While other companies aim to provide users with desktop-level customization, Intel wants to offer hardware partners greater flexibility.

Subramaniam, who is also the vice president of Intel's Client Computing Group, said the last two or three generations of the company's laptops have made systems, boards, and components more modular. The changes should help vendors like Acer and Asus provide customers with more options without building completely new models.

Framework's laptop components

For example, Intel might design a single board for all 16-inch dual-fan laptops, and another for all 14-inch single-fan models. As a result, hardware partners could simply slot the boards into shells featuring various component combinations. The company also aims to introduce more flexibility by splitting boards into multiple smaller interchangeable PCBs, allowing customers to select individual components when customizing orders.

Intel initially outlined its plans in January when it proposed a standard set of measurements for laptop motherboards and I/O modules. Industry-wide acceptance might speed up the design process for new components and enable users to upgrade individual parts without replacing the entire laptop. The company could also apply the concept to mini-PCs.

Framework has been offering modular laptops for years, allowing users to swap motherboards, I/O ports, and other parts without replacing the chassis. Eventually, the company hopes to expand its selection of socketable discrete graphics for its 16-inch models, but recent tariffs have complicated sales to US customers. Still, Framework recently introduced its first desktop and 12-inch laptop models. So far, the company has focused on x86 hardware but recently began cooperating with DeepComputing to expand into RISC-V.

Meanwhile, MNT is developing a similar modular ecosystem for Arm Linux laptops. However, instead of off-the-shelf parts, the company's Reform laptops utilize more exotic components to emphasize total independence from major tech giants. MNT also has a prototype mini desktop, and a touch device is in early development.

It remains unclear whether Intel or other major laptop companies might ever adopt at-home customization like Framework and MNT.

Permalink to story:

 
Given the dumpster fire that has historically been Framework’s FW support, there is certainly room for competition.
 
We should have had standardized modular laptop components decades ago, just as we've long had form factor standards for desktops, workstations, and servers (e.g., ATX, Micro-ATX, Mini-ITX, E-ATX, SSI CEB/EEB/MEB).

While there are multiple motherboard standards, they all aim to balance different use cases with broad component compatibility. The primary differences among these form factors are board size and the number of expansion slots. In many cases, components can be interchanged between systems with different form factors, provided the chipset and other specifications are compatible.

Laptops have long needed similar standards, though I understand it's more challenging due to constraints like size and weight. I believe it's achievable, but it will require significant cooperation. Hopefully, Intel can make it happen.
 
Kudos to Intel! I too would like to see us all go back to modular and upgradeable laptops! I'm tired of the race to thin e-waste that companies, including Apple, keep churning out.
 
Intel really led the way with their awesome Desktop motherboards and Nucs. *Joking*
They did have quality Server boards and Chassis back in the day though...
For a notebook to be truly modeler, they'd have to become bigger/thicker & heavier. I can also see it would also introduce stability issues with contacts, etc.

In the end you'd still be better off with a PC...
 
In the end you'd still be better off with a PC...
Some people don't have that option. For various reasons they need a mobile platform. A LOT of people miss being able to upgrade the CPU, RAM, GPU and drive in their laptops. This might be a smaller market segment but it is by no means insignificant. Your comment and perspective fails to account for this.
 
Back