Jackson, Mississippi residents can soon opt-in to provide surveillance cam footage to...

Polycount

Posts: 3,017   +590
Staff
In brief: Security-conscious Jackson, Mississipi residents may soon be able to opt-in to give local police access to footage recorded by their own, private surveillance cameras. This footage would only be used to help track down criminals, and it could reduce or eliminate the need for official city surveillance cams in residential areas.

The city of Jackson is already letting some residents opt-in to a limited pilot program to test out this concept. If all goes well, it could expand across the rest of the city.

It should be noted that the cameras would only be accessed when or if a crime is reported in the area -- otherwise, they operate as usual, and the police will reportedly not be looking in on your recordings.

"Ultimately, what will happen is residents and businesses will be able to sign a waiver, if they want their camera to be accessed from the Real Time Crime Center,"

"Ultimately, what will happen is residents and businesses will be able to sign a waiver, if they want their camera to be accessed from the Real Time Crime Center," explains Jackson Mayor Chokwe Lumumba in a statement to WLBT news. "It would save [us] from having to buy a camera for every place across the city."

Although the privacy implications of this program are worth considering, the opt-in nature of this program should soothe the fears of at least some individuals who fear government spying.

Cloud-based crime data coordinator Fusus will be providing Jackson officials with the equipment they'll need to connect to security cameras from companies like Ring and Arlo. Notably, these companies are not working directly with the city or law enforcement -- indeed, Ring actively distanced itself from the program when contacted by Engadget.

This pilot program will run for 45 days in Jackson before its future will be discussed by the city's leaders.

Image credit: BrandonKleinVideo

Permalink to story.

 
Personally, I would prefer that they would come and ask me for access. However, I understand that would not be as helpful with a crime that is in progress and etc. So pros and cons on both sides. If someone does agree to it in their trail run, I hope that at least the owner gets a notification.
 
"It should be noted that the cameras would only be accessed when or if a crime is reported in the area -- otherwise, they operate as usual, and the police will reportedly not be looking in on your recordings."
Oh yes? And what could possibly go wrong?
 
Nope! If they want to access my camera, you come and ask me. 99.9% of the time, I would say
they are more than welcome to have it, but, just giving them access without asking? NO!
 
There's probably some benefit just to crooks thinking the police might have it.

For me it'd probably come down to how much trouble my street / neighborhood was having with nuisance property crimes. If I was losing packages left and right and I thought this might make the difference in cops being willing to look at footage and maybe act if it gave them an easy lead, I'd be tempted.

(I say nuisance because the cops were always going to come looking either way for say a murder. It's the mundane stuff that they might just say "sorry too busy" if they didn't have a convenient way to proceed.)
 
My custom cooling is so sloppy it would probably electricute the thief or confuse him into backing out slowly.
 
Back