Lithium-sulfur battery advancements promise faster charging and longer life

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 584   +13
Staff
TL;DR: Recent advancements in lithium-sulfur battery technology have been reported by two independent research teams, each tackling key challenges in commercializing these energy storage devices. One team concentrated on enhancing the cathode material, while the other developed an innovative solid electrolyte.

In the first study, a team led by Professor Jong-sung Yu at the DGIST Department of Energy Science and Engineering developed a nitrogen-doped porous carbon material to enhance the charging speed of lithium-sulfur batteries. This material, synthesized using a magnesium-assisted thermal reduction method, acts as a sulfur host in the battery cathode. The resulting battery exhibited remarkable performance, achieving a high capacity of 705 mAh g⁻¹ even when fully charged in just 12 minutes.

The carbon structure, formed by the reaction of magnesium with nitrogen in ZIF-8 at high temperatures, enabled higher sulfur loading and improved electrolyte contact. This advancement resulted in a 1.6-fold increase in capacity compared to conventional batteries under rapid charging conditions. Furthermore, the nitrogen doping effectively suppressed lithium polysulfide migration, allowing the battery to retain 82 percent of its capacity after 1,000 charge-discharge cycles.

Collaboration with Argonne National Laboratory revealed that lithium sulfide formed in a specific orientation within the carbon material's layered structures. This finding confirmed the benefits of nitrogen doping and the porous carbon structure in boosting sulfur loading and accelerating reaction speed.

A separate study by Chinese and German researchers introduced a solid electrolyte designed to address the slow chemical reaction between lithium ions and elemental sulfur. This innovative electrolyte is a glass-like material composed of boron, sulfur, lithium, phosphorus, and iodine.

The standout feature of this study is the inclusion of iodine in the electrolyte. Thanks to its rapid electron exchange capabilities, iodine acts as an intermediate in electron transfer to sulfur, dramatically accelerating electrode reactions. Researchers propose that iodine's mobility within the electrolyte may allow it to function as an electron shuttle.

The performance results were equally impressive. When charged at an extremely fast rate – achieving a full charge in just over a minute – the battery retained half the capacity of one charged 25 times more slowly. At an intermediate charging rate, the battery retained over 80 percent of its initial capacity after more than 25,000 charge-discharge cycles. This level of durability far exceeds that of conventional lithium-ion batteries, which typically experience similar capacity degradation after only about 1,000 cycles.

Together, these advancements bring lithium-sulfur batteries closer to practical implementation. The DGIST team's work demonstrates the promise of advanced cathode materials in rapid-charging scenarios, while the Chinese-German collaboration highlights the transformative potential of solid electrolytes in improving battery longevity and charging speed.

Permalink to story:

 
It seems there's an article that starts with "Recent advancements in" regarding battery tech every couple of weeks, yet somehow these improvements never actually materialize in the real world. I've been hearing about all these new advancements in battery tech for well over a decade now, so it would be nice to actually see one enter mass production. But yeah, the dreaming continues...
 
It seems there's an article that starts with "Recent advancements in" regarding battery tech every couple of weeks, yet somehow these improvements never actually materialize in the real world. I've been hearing about all these new advancements in battery tech for well over a decade now, so it would be nice to actually see one enter mass production. But yeah, the dreaming continues...
90% (or more) of “emerging technologies” never see the light of day… saying that, however, batteries HAVE gotten better over the years…
 
It seems there's an article that starts with "Recent advancements in" regarding battery tech every couple of weeks, yet somehow these improvements never actually materialize in the real world. I've been hearing about all these new advancements in battery tech for well over a decade now, so it would be nice to actually see one enter mass production. But yeah, the dreaming continues...
The problem is someone sees a researcher etc. publish a paper and then every news site picks it up from one news agency where a writer summarised it and really hasn't emphasised this is just a discovery in a paper and no one has said anything about commercial production viability and the like, whether its reliable etc. (Especially as a lot of research is done based on grants, so by and large they're not going to write "this has good results but it actually useless" in their paper)
 
As an EV owner, I'm happy to see battery improvements and declining prices.

I don't know how you arrive at that conclusion. While the batteries we buy to power our electronic devices have declined, EV's and their batteries are going the wrong way. Prices are going up across the board, and the vast majority of them are luxury vehicles that are second cars for the well to do. Not to mention the insurance, costs to charge, etc. All while range, refueling times, and carrying capacity remain well below their combustion counterparts. Add to that the every manufacture except Tesla and the extremely high end luxury/performance nameplates is selling these at a loss to boot.
 
It seems there's an article that starts with "Recent advancements in" regarding battery tech every couple of weeks, yet somehow these improvements never actually materialize in the real world. I've been hearing about all these new advancements in battery tech for well over a decade now, so it would be nice to actually see one enter mass production. But yeah, the dreaming continues...
Silicon-carbon batteries?
 
90% (or more) of “emerging technologies” never see the light of day… saying that, however, batteries HAVE gotten better over the years…
Yes, batteries have gotten better... very slowly and over a long period of time. That's the problem. All these articles about battery tech make it sound like they discovered something that will make our batteries orders of magnitude better. But that's never the case.
 
I'm going to try to not say something stupid here but; If anybody here thinks lithium batteries emit some nasty gases when they catch fire, can you imagine what what treats for the senses and respiratory system elemental sulfur can, "cook up"? (bad pun notwithstanding).
 
Yes, batteries have gotten better... very slowly and over a long period of time. That's the problem. All these articles about battery tech make it sound like they discovered something that will make our batteries orders of magnitude better. But that's never the case.
Well, they certainly don’t make major advances most of the time - no tech on Earth has that happen…
But we have gotten a few - lithium batteries weren’t a thing until the 90s… and EVs weren’t a thing until they got a lot better…

Patience is key - unless the whole world is involved (like with the COVID vaccines) tech tends to take time…
 
I hear every other day that cancer/HIV cure is discovered and new battery tech will last this and I see none of them coming out.
 
Back