Metacritic crowns Bethesda its top publisher of 2017

midian182

Posts: 10,758   +142
Staff member

Everyone has a favorite video game publisher, but if you want to know who comes out on top based on their Metacritic scores, the aggregate site has you covered. In its 8th annual game publisher rankings, Metacritic places Bethesda in the number one spot.

The publishers are split into two categories: ‘major publishers’ who release 12 or more games during a year; and ‘mid-size’ for all the rest. Thanks to its 12 “distinct titles” in 2017, Bethesda has moved from heading the mid-size publishers table to leading the major group.

"The publisher increased its Metascore average by more than six points compared to its 2016 slate thanks to a well-received new entry in the Wolfenstein franchise, a reboot of Prey, a strong Evil Within sequel, and various releases in the Elder Scrolls series," Metacritic wrote. "In all, 91 percent of the company's 2017 products were positively reviewed—the best rate for any publisher."

As you can see in the table below, the rankings aren’t based solely on average Metascores. Metacritic uses a points system that takes into account the number of ‘great,’ ‘good,’ and ‘bad’ games from a company, giving a better average result.

While Bethesda narrowly missed out releasing any 'great' games with scores of over 90 percent—Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus was closest with 88 percent—91 percent of its total games scored 75 percent or more, putting them in the 'good' category. It had no 'bad' games with scores of 49 percent or lower. Runner-up Nintendo had three 'great' games but only 72 percent were 'good.'

In the mid-size list, Binding of Isaac and Cave Story+ publisher Nicalis comes out on top. And because it only released 11 distinct titles last year, EA is classified as mid-sized. The company sits in the number 5 position, with Metacritic users handing out bad reviews to almost all of its 2017 games.

  • Nicalis – 79.8
  • Paradox Interactive – 80.6
  • Devolver Digital – 76.5
  • Warner Bros. Interactive – 73.7
  • Electronic Arts – 73.2
  • Daedalic Entertainment – 73.0
  • Plug In Digital – 75.3
  • Hamster – 73.6
  • Take-Two Interactive – 72.8
  • Adult Swim – 71.0
  • XSEED Games – 73.0
  • Microsoft Game Studios – 72.0
  • Headup Games – 68.2
  • Aksys Games – 71.0
  • THQ Nordic – 68.2

Permalink to story.

 
So like Bethesda is top publisher even they did not publish any top games?

Metacritic at it's best.
 
I looked at dictionary. I didn't see that average = top.
So you don't understand what getting an average means then... if company A has a 90% and a 30%.... it has an AVERAGE of 60%.... if Company B has an 80% and a 70%, it has an AVERAGE of 75%.... so even though company A has the highest score, Company B is the better company... because, ON AVERAGE, it has better games... This is elementary school math...
 
So you don't understand what getting an average means then... if company A has a 90% and a 30%.... it has an AVERAGE of 60%.... if Company B has an 80% and a 70%, it has an AVERAGE of 75%.... so even though company A has the highest score, Company B is the better company... because, ON AVERAGE, it has better games... This is elementary school math...

Exactly. And that essentially tells why Metacritic is so broken. Bethesda is on top even when Bethesda has no top games.

Your mathematics do not hold however because those scores on table are not based on averages.
 
Exactly. And that essentially tells why Metacritic is so broken. Bethesda is on top even when Bethesda has no top games.

Your mathematics do not hold however because those scores on table are not based on averages.
But they have no BOTTOM games... they are all GOOD games, which means they are the most dependable publisher... And yes, those numbers DO come from averages - but from more than 2 numbers, obviously... they get their scores by AVERAGING all of the reviews for each game.... And it's not MY math - it's everyone's math!
 
But they have no BOTTOM games... they are all GOOD games, which means they are the most dependable publisher... And yes, those numbers DO come from averages - but from more than 2 numbers, obviously... they get their scores by AVERAGING all of the reviews for each game.... And it's not MY math - it's everyone's math!

First they adjust review's score into 1-100 scale. Then they count average of scores that 1-100 scale. Then they randomly select how many points is required for good, bad and great game. Points are based on those randomly selected categories.

Not much mathematics there tbh.
 
Bethesda, please make a FPS campaign co-op with 8 or more players and continuous new missions. That would be so awesome.
 
First they adjust review's score into 1-100 scale. Then they count average of scores that 1-100 scale. Then they randomly select how many points is required for good, bad and great game. Points are based on those randomly selected categories.

Not much mathematics there tbh.
It's not "random", it's arbitrary.... and that doesn't matter for the AVERAGE score... it's still an AVERAGE.... I'm not sure why I'd expect you to understand the math when you still think that your Radeon from 5 years ago will out-perform a 1080.... but hey, can't blame me for trying :)
 
Back