Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024 looks even more stunning, dramatically reduces storage requirements

Daniel Sims

Posts: 1,878   +49
Staff
Something to look forward to: Microsoft and Asobo Studio have started providing in-depth details on what is arguably Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024's most intriguing addition: a career mode. In a new preview, the companies also cover various technical upgrades to the game and reveal some surprisingly reasonable system requirements.

Pre-orders are now open for Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024 on Xbox and the Microsoft Store, with a Steam page likely to follow soon. Additionally, the full system requirements are now available, revealing a game that is modestly more demanding than its 2020 predecessor with a significantly reduced SSD footprint.

During a June deep-dive presentation, Asobo said it wanted Flight Simulator 2024 to maintain minimum system requirements identical to the previous title. While the final spec sheet the company shared on Thursday doesn't quite hit that mark, it lands fairly close.

Click to enlarge

The recommended specs for Flight Simulator 2020 have now become the minimum for the sequel – 16 GB of system memory paired with an AMD Radeon RX 5700 or Nvidia GeForce GTX 970 with 4 GB of video memory.

Meanwhile, the "ideal" specs for the older game have shifted to the recommended tier for Flight Simulator 2024 – 32 GB of RAM with a Radeon RX 5700 XT or RTX 2080 and 8 GB of VRAM.

For maximum performance in the new entry, Asobo recommends mid-range Zen 4 or Raptor Lake Refresh CPUs, an RX 7900 XT or RTX 4080, 12 GB of VRAM, and 64 GB of system RAM. The new tier likely reflects the addition of ray tracing.

Despite the unheard-of recommendation for 64 GB of RAM, users will likely appreciate seeing the storage requirement plummet from 150 GB to 50. Asobo confirmed that the initial download is only 30 GB.

Comparison of the same location in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 (top) and 2024 (bottom). Image credit: FSElite

The catch is that Flight Simulator 2024 will stream content from the cloud according to each player's in-game location. As a result, the system requirements include internet bandwidth: a minimum of 10 Mbps is required, while Asobo recommends 50 Mbps, and ideal conditions call for 100 Mbps.

Both Flight Simulator 2020 and 2024 require an internet connection because they enable players to traverse every square kilometer of Earth at a life-sized scale. However, the new title shifts the data burden from users' SSDs to the cloud, only downloading and caching assets relevant to the selected region. Flight Simulator 2024 also streams DLC packages and purchased content, which could consume up to 2 TB in the previous version.

All environment assets have been updated with increased detail and a more advanced terrain generation system. Furthermore, different types of terrain can affect a plane's landing gear, leaving dirt and impacting controls through a new physics system.

Microsoft and Asobo have also detailed the new career mode. Players can start from any airport on the planet, where they will receive initial flight lessons and earn money through various jobs. After purchasing and passing enough exams, players can eventually run their own airlines and manage fleets.

Flying also incorporates a new preflight check system involving on-foot inspections, weather planning, and mission briefings. A new competition mode will feature weekly challenges, while a world photography mode allows players to snap pictures of landmarks and wildlife across the planet, from the air or on the ground.

Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024 will be available on Xbox Series consoles, the Microsoft Store, and Steam on November 19. Microsoft and Asobo will continue to support the 2020 edition, and almost all purchases will carry over to the sequel.

Permalink to story:

 
The ryzen 7900x doesn't make sense to me. Due to it being 2x6core CCDs instead of 1X8cores, it's slower and more expensive than the 7700/7800X in many gaming loads.

The 7900X is still by all means a great CPU, it's just that having 2 CCDs instead of one makes it not the ideal gaming CPU.
 
Playing this on a Samsung G9 and a 4090 must be fantastic, but I prefer spending that money to travel somewhere in real life with my family xD
 
The ryzen 7900x doesn't make sense to me. Due to it being 2x6core CCDs instead of 1X8cores, it's slower and more expensive than the 7700/7800X in many gaming loads.

The 7900X is still by all means a great CPU, it's just that having 2 CCDs instead of one makes it not the ideal gaming CPU.

That and apparently no Intel GPU support...
 
That and apparently no Intel GPU support...
Not like that's a huge loss. However, part of me would like an Intel GPU to mess around with, they're still top expensive for what they are. Interested to see what there next gen of GPUs look like and if they are stable enough to keep prices down.
 
it's slower and more expensive than the 7700/7800X in many gaming loads.

This isn't "many gaming loads", it's a specific gaming workload. If FS2024 is well threaded, a 7900X could certainly work better than a 7800X.
 
This isn't "many gaming loads", it's a specific gaming workload. If FS2024 is well threaded, a 7900X could certainly work better than a 7800X.
It has nothing to do with core count and everything to do with the latency between CCDs and how their 12core chipa have the same amount of cache per CCD as their 6 core models. They recommend an 8 core CPU, the 7900x isn't a true 12 core chip, it's a 2x6 core chip. It is well documented that AMDs 12 core chips perform closer to their 6core chips than their 8 core chips.

The 7900X is still a fantastic chip, but calling it the "Ideal" chip from AMD is nonsensical
 
I still haven’t gotten MSFS2020 to work the way it should.
Yeah it's been a turbulent flight sim. I love MSF2020 but it's hard to keep it stable sometimes. I've just come to accept it. The amount of free DLC has been unreal. They do patch a lot of bugs and have added updated DLSS and FSR support. I'm excited for the MSF2024 for sure.
 
This isn't "many gaming loads", it's a specific gaming workload. If FS2024 is well threaded, a 7900X could certainly work better than a 7800X.
I had the same thought. The CCD latency hit may not matter as much as core count. Don't see that too often but this sim really uses pushes hardware usage.
 
Yeah it's been a turbulent flight sim. I love MSF2020 but it's hard to keep it stable sometimes. I've just come to accept it. The amount of free DLC has been unreal. They do patch a lot of bugs and have added updated DLSS and FSR support. I'm excited for the MSF2024 for sure.
It won’t stop me from purchasing MSFS2024. Just not until a few SUs have been implemented to correct the inevitable first-out bugs. I’m tired of being a guinea pig for 4 years.
 
Funny how they go from minimum to recommend specs (when just looking at the numbering):

CPU
AMD 2600X > 2700X = 1 tier up, same gen
Intel 6800K > 10700K = 1 tier down, 4 gens up

GPU
AMD 5700 > 5700XT = 1 'segment' up, same tier, same gen
Nvidia GTX970 > RTX2080 = 1 tier up, 2 gens up
 
EA's fifa taught me that if you release an annual game at the end of the year, you need to give the next year in the name if you choose to include the year in the game's name.
Seriously, it is almost the end of the year, name it Flight Sim 2025 and then people can feel good knowing they are playing the newest and best.
 
EA's fifa taught me that if you release an annual game at the end of the year, you need to give the next year in the name if you choose to include the year in the game's name.
Seriously, it is almost the end of the year, name it Flight Sim 2025 and then people can feel good knowing they are playing the newest and best.
True.
 
I had Microsoft Flight Simulator on my Dell Desktop using Windows 98SE. It ran pretty well. I'm looking forward to this new edition. I have a two year old HP, with Win 11 Pro. It might not run it very well, but I'm going to try it out. If not, I'll buy a computer that will run it. :)
 
Back