Nearly 75% of RTO companies will require at least three days in the office per week by the end of 2025

midian182

Posts: 10,633   +141
Staff member
A hot potato: It's no secret that the majority of people would prefer to work from home rather than in the office, but most employers simply don't care. A new survey shows that by the end of next year, almost three-quarters of companies with RTO policies will require staff in the office at least three days a week. Collaboration and teamwork are major reasons, as are existing lease agreements.

In November 2024, Resume-building platform Resume.Org surveyed 900 business leaders whose companies had implemented return-to-office (RTO) policies since the pandemic.

The results show that 73% of companies surveyed will require employees to work in the office three or more days a week by then end of 2025. Almost 30% of firms will be demanding employees appear in person five days per week, a schedule that Amazon, Nothing, UPS, and many more are following. Only 2% will ask staff to show up once per week or less.

Companies tend to scream the productivity argument when trying to justify bringing workers back, despite studies showing employees feel more productive at home. While increased productivity is one of the primary reasons cited in this survey (47%), strengthening company culture (51%), improving communication (58%), and collaboration and teamwork (69%) are bigger drivers.

There are also practical reasons for wanting employees back. Two-thirds of companies that were surveyed currently lease office space, with nearly half of these leases extending to 2028 or beyond. Over half of these firms said leasing office space influenced their RTO policies, with 16% reporting a major impact and 38% some impact.

There is some good news for workers as a result of these leases, though: 23% of companies plan to decrease the amount of office space they rent. Of these companies, 32% will reduce the number of required days in the office, and 8% will stop requiring employees to go into the office.

Universities from the US and China recently collaborated on a paper titled Return to Office Mandates and Brain Drain, which compares the effect of 54 S&P 500 firms' RTO mandates on their employee turnover and hiring. The results show that firms experience abnormally high employee turnover of around 14% following the implementation of RTO mandates. Furthermore, the increased turnover rates for these RTO firms are more pronounced in female, senior, and skilled employees.

While companies won't want to lose their best and brightest workers, there have been accusations that many RTO mandates are masquerading as "quiet firing," defined as creating conditions that encourage an employee to leave a job voluntarily rather than being terminated by an employer.

Permalink to story:

 
Even before any of the 'We need to save our pointless real estate investment by forcing you to use our offices' line of thinking came through, it was already a common thing for bigger companies to lose key talent to start ups that were willing to pay more, seriously consider them for promotions, actually allow a work-life balance, etc.

Now that they're adamant about destroying employee morale for what's been proved results in NO productivity gains, well they're just setting up the smaller start ups to snatch people on easy mode: 'I'll match your salary and bennies but also give you full remote' is actually going to SAVE them money instead of using a lot of it on trying to pay above market average for the positions.
 
This is funny, while I'm a big fan of work life balance and working from home I will say its not for everyone
but those that I've heard their side of the fence specifically tell me their reasoning for on site is because they want access to you physically when they need you to do something, shoulder tapping is huge in corporate america, if they message you..you can take your time getting the request done when you're WFH as you have other priorities, but if you're in the office they can shoulder tap you and have you switch to whatever they need right away ASAP!!! we need it now!!!!

for me, since im currently hybrid office time is spent trying to get work done...the constant distractions of coworkers asking me about my weekend or what I did last night or what games do you play or hows your truck doing or lets go get coffee, or having political discussions.
you cant stop people from socializing either, if you're going that far just outsource the entire department.
anyways the whole thing is stupid, if you want to save corporate real estate just turn it into apartments instead of bringing up new buildings and killing the skyline.
 
Hey, your employer pays your salary. If, you don't like coming into the office, you could always quit, and sell shoes for a living... :)
 
My company ordered people to return in mass in October, you know what happened? Everyone ignored them and they haven't mentioned it since.
 
RTO mandates are not "quiet firing", these companies that request it didnt allow you to work from home pre-pandemic anyway. Those who did, they don't mandate RTO anyway.
 
Back