Netflix's Assassin's Creed series is finally moving forward after years of delays

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 763   +16
Staff
Editor's take: Video game adaptations are hitting their stride, and Netflix is betting Assassin's Creed will join the ranks of recent hits. If the show captures the intrigue and depth that made the games global sensations, it could deliver the long-running story streaming audiences crave.

After years of uncertainty, Netflix has officially committed to producing a live-action television adaptation of the popular Assassin's Creed video game franchise. The announcement signals new momentum for a project long stalled in development, despite high expectations fueled by the franchise's enduring global popularity among gamers.

The streaming giant first announced plans to adapt Assassin's Creed into a series in 2020, but the project struggled to find a steady creative direction. Several teams cycled through development before a final lineup was confirmed. Now, with co-showrunners Roberto Patino and David Wiener at the helm, the adaptation is finally moving forward. Patino brings experience from shows like Sons of Anarchy and Westworld, while Wiener previously oversaw Paramount's Halo series and worked on Fear the Walking Dead.

Details about the plot, characters, and casting remain under wraps. However, those familiar with the games can expect the series to draw on the franchise's core premise: an age-old conflict between two secret societies, the Assassins and the Templars, played out across different periods and cultures. Central to the narrative is the Animus, a fictional device that allows characters to relive the lives of their ancestors through genetic memory.

The franchise's sprawling historical settings have always been central to its appeal. Since its debut in 2007, Assassin's Creed has taken players through a wide range of eras and locations, from Renaissance Italy to Ancient Greece, Viking-age England, and most recently, feudal Japan in Assassin's Creed Shadows. In total, Ubisoft has released 14 mainline titles over the past 18 years, with each installment showcasing detailed reconstructions of historical settings and gradually expanding the series' gameplay from stealth action into more open-ended role-playing experiences.

Also read: 13 Years of Assassin's Creed: From Prince of Persia to an Annual Globe-Trotting Time-Travelling Stealth Game

Ubisoft has released 14 mainline titles over 18 years, each showcasing detailed historical settings and expanding gameplay from stealth action to open-ended role-playing. Netflix's new adaptation follows a 2016 Assassin's Creed film starring Michael Fassbender. Although that movie received mixed reviews and modest box office returns, it gave fans hope that the series could come to life beyond consoles. Whether the TV show will acknowledge or build on the film's events remains unclear.

Permalink to story:

 
So do we think they will try to mix in the Abstergo Industries flash-forward/flash-back thing, or will they just stay in the past?
plot twist, they're going to tell us about how pigeons were actually pulling the stings the whole time and how human evolution was controlled by them just so they could **** on our cars in the future. That's about the quality of story I expect from an AC creed game these days.
 
So do we think they will try to mix in the Abstergo Industries flash-forward/flash-back thing, or will they just stay in the past?
Good question. I think that the best idea for the series would be to make the Amimus a central part of the story. That way, the same actors for the present appear in every season using the Animus to travel back. and with each season being a different period--essentially just like the games. This would be the most interesting approach and would link each season together in a way that makes sense. Just making the whole thing Animus flashbacks would be the least interesting way to present it.

That said, Hollywood will probably do the opposite of good. Despite the few examples of VG adaptations that have done well, I have little faith that they will execute (heh didn't actually mean for a pun there, but it's a good one) this production well. Even looking at the series that have done well--they weren't realy that good.

The Witcher. Season one was great. Season 2 was kinda okay, but season 3 was boring and couldn't hold my attention past the season 3 intermission (and don't even get me started on split seasons).

The Last of Us. I haven't watched it. As I understand, it has a following, but I was uninterested from the start because of the casting and because I already suspected that they were taking the series in a different direction as far as the narrative went--and I was right.

Fallout. The first season I actually enjoyed, as did many others. It's been renewed for a second and third season, so here's hoping it can maintain its momentum rather than petering out like The Witcher did.

Cyberpunk: Edgerunners. This was a really good anime adaptation that left me wanting more. But in typical Hollywood fashion, it was not renewed for a second season. As I understand, this was more CDPR's decision than Studio Trigger's, but it still shows why I don't have much faith in Hollywood doing things right (And yes, I realize the Trigger is based in Japan--not Hollywood, but I'm using the term to describe the industry, not the location).
 
Cyberpunk: Edgerunners. This was a really good anime adaptation that left me wanting more. But in typical Hollywood fashion, it was not renewed for a second season. As I understand, this was more CDPR's decision than Studio Trigger's, but it still shows why I don't have much faith in Hollywood doing things right (And yes, I realize the Trigger is based in Japan--not Hollywood, but I'm using the term to describe the industry, not the location).
While I agree that I want more, the story was completed. Same with Trigun, Cowboy Bebop and Samurai Champloo. The reason we want more is that those shows knew to end it when they did.

You mentioned in your post of all these shows that has great first seasons, second was okay and by the third they sucked. Maybe the best idea is to complete the story and call it quits while it's still good.

One thing about the fallout TV show, I have a feeling it's going to be good because the story isn't finished yet. They didn't leave the show off on a cliff hanger, the story isn't done yet. That said, while I love the fallout TV show, I didn't think that the first season was that good. The played games with the lore that annoyed me. I did love the actors and I thought the story was better than average so I will be happy if the next 2 seasons continue the "better than average" trend, they complete the story and end it before it gets old.
 
While I agree that I want more, the story was completed. Same with Trigun, Cowboy Bebop and Samurai Champloo. The reason we want more is that those shows knew to end it when they did.

You mentioned in your post of all these shows that has great first seasons, second was okay and by the third they sucked. Maybe the best idea is to complete the story and call it quits while it's still good.

One thing about the fallout TV show, I have a feeling it's going to be good because the story isn't finished yet. They didn't leave the show off on a cliff hanger, the story isn't done yet. That said, while I love the fallout TV show, I didn't think that the first season was that good. The played games with the lore that annoyed me. I did love the actors and I thought the story was better than average so I will be happy if the next 2 seasons continue the "better than average" trend, they complete the story and end it before it gets old.
I like the fallout show. Good acting imo. The wait tho could kill it. People move on quickly in this day an age. Taking 2 years between seasons is risky. Hopefully no delays happen.
 
I liked the AC movie. Nothing great but as a movie person, I'd say solid C movie, maybe B. I had no illusion that it would represent the game which rarely happens. I enjoyed it tho.
 
Back