New operating system could let US Army Black Hawk helicopters be piloted with basic training

zohaibahd

Posts: 934   +19
Staff
In brief: Everyone is automating everything these days, and military aircraft are no exception. The venerable UH-60 Black Hawk helicopter, first used by the US Army in 1979, is set to receive upgrades that will allow it to take off with the touch of a button – and potentially even without pilots onboard.

The US Army is teaming up with a company called Skyryse to make their massive fleet of over 2,100 UH-60 Black Hawks significantly smarter and easier to operate.

The project will be fueled by Skyryse's "SkyOS," which is being billed as the world's first universal operating system for flight. The system is designed to simplify pretty much every aspect of helicopter operations through automation and intelligent interfaces.

SkyOS completely ditches the old-school pilots' yokes and instrument panels, which can be tough to use in the heat of battle. Instead, it uses two simple touchscreen displays and a single side-stick controller to command the aircraft. Everything from airspeed to navigation is conveniently a finger away.

Now, the use of touchscreens may sound too distracting or fiddly for serious military ops. To compensate for this, SkyOS incorporates smart 3D terrain mapping to alert pilots to hazards. It can automatically hold a stable hover with one tap. And it has full triple-redundant fly-by-wire backups for absolute reliability.

Currently, it takes 2-3 years for pilots to be certified for Army helicopters like the Black Hawk. SkyOS aims to streamline that process considerably. It could even allow almost anyone to fly these choppers with some basic training, though that's obviously not the Army's intention. The long-term vision is to make flying so simple that minimal training would be required for new pilots.

Moreover, the consistent, hardware-agnostic nature of the software could ultimately allow skills to transfer between different aircraft types. But perhaps the greatest perk offered by the system is optionally-piloted operation, which could allow Black Hawks to fly unmanned for hazardous missions.

So, when can we expect to see Black Hawks getting the smart treatment? The integration process is already underway, but it won't be an instant overhaul. Skyryse's system requires retrofitting helicopters with new touchscreen hardware and complex re-wiring. It's an intricate process that will likely play out incrementally over several years.

Permalink to story:

 
We've already proven that AI and gyros can stabilize and fly just about anything - better than a human.

Why we haven't added auto-hover, auto-pilot and auto-land to most helicopters is anyone's guess.
 
I attended Ft. Rucker and learned basic flight, instrument flight and UH-60 to become a fully rated aviator, like all my brothers and sisters in 11 months. 2-3 years is as.
Toys are nice, but flying by proprioception input is the best, I.e., by the seat of one's pants.
 
We've already proven that AI and gyros can stabilize and fly just about anything - better than a human.

Why we haven't added auto-hover, auto-pilot and auto-land to most helicopters is anyone's guess.
Several models of the -60 have those, Jayhawk, EH-60, UH-60Q MedEvac. But, it's not really appropriate for combat operations, especially low level NOE flight.
 
2-3 years to learn the Blackhawk is not correct. The UH,-60 transition for rated aviator is 6-weeks. I want through basic flight, instrument flight and UH-60 secondary in 11 months.
 
True, but anything energetic enough to pass through the bullet resistant armor will likely also go through crew.
A bullet or shrapnel that misses a crewmember but takes out the panel still dooms the aircraft and everyone inside. Military stuff should be rugged and redundant, not fancy and sci-fi looking
 
A bullet or shrapnel that misses a crewmember but takes out the panel still dooms the aircraft and everyone inside. Military stuff should be rugged and redundant, not fancy and sci-fi looking
Just the opposite, LCD panels means anything critical on one panel that gets taken out can be set to be displayed on another working panel instantly. Good luck when your fixed function panel is destroyed.

Also, the back of the LCD panel can be armored as heavily as is practical, just like old school panels.
 
Just the opposite, LCD panels means anything critical on one panel that gets taken out can be set to be displayed on another working panel instantly. Good luck when your fixed function panel is destroyed.

Also, the back of the LCD panel can be armored as heavily as is practical, just like old school panels.
You make a good point for multi-panel redundancy. I can't help but imagine cybertruck-esq system issues when everything goes electronic and automated. But you're right, nothing some armor can't solve.
 
Back